来源：长安街知事 公开资料显示，田蓉出生于1962年12月，土家族，湖南龙山人，曾任成都市温江区委副书 记、区长、区委书记，成都市政府党组成员、副市长，市委常委、宣传部部长等职。 2022年4月，田蓉转任成都市政协党组副书记、副主席。今年2月，她于任上被查。 "双开"通报指出，田蓉丧失理想信念，背弃初心使命，对党不忠诚不老实，对抗组织审查； 罔顾中央八项规定精神， 多次接受可能影响公正执行公务的旅游活动安排 ； 违反组织原则，在组织谈话时不如实向组织说明问题； 廉洁底线失守，长期违规收受礼金， 违规拥有非上市企业股份 ； 9月24日，四川省纪委监委公开通报5起违反中央八项规定精神典型问题，其中包括成都市政 协原党组副书记、副主席田蓉接受可能影响公正执行公务的旅游活动安排等问题。 据通报，2023年10月至2024年12月，田蓉多次携家人到云南、海南等地旅游，无偿接受私 营企业主提供的车辆、住宿及餐饮服务。 田蓉还存在其他严重违纪违法问题。2025年7月，她被开除党籍、开除公职，其涉嫌犯罪问 题被移送检察机关依法审查起诉。 田蓉 资料图 将党和人民赋予的公权力异化为谋取私利的工具，利用职务便利，为他人在企业经营 ...

亳州市谯城区政协农业和农村委员会原主任、三级调研员姜学尚违规收受礼品礼金、消费 卡，接受可能影响公正执行公务的宴请和旅游活动安排等问题。 2 0 1 3年至2024年，姜学 尚多次违规收受管理和服务对象所送礼金、消费卡和高档烟酒等礼品；违规接受私营企业 主安排的宴请；携家人违规接受私营企业主安排赴福建厦门游玩；在江苏常州公务考察期 间违规接受私营企业主安排赴景区游玩，相关费用由对方支付。姜学尚还存在其他严重违 纪违法问题，2025年4月被开除党籍，按规定取消享受的待遇，涉嫌犯罪问题被移送检察 机关依法审查起诉。 芜湖市鸠江区沈巷镇党委原书记何启智违规收受礼品礼金、消费卡，接受可能影响公正执 行公务的宴请，违规向企业摊派费用等问题。 2013年至2025年，何启智多次在节日期间 违规收受管理和服务对象所送礼金和高档烟酒等礼品；多次违规接受私营企业主安排的宴 请；2 0 2 3年至2 02 4年，以支持乡村建设为由，违规向辖区内相关企业摊派费用，加重企 业负担。何启智还存在其他严重违纪违法问题，2025年8月被开除党籍、开除公职，涉嫌 犯罪问题被移送检察机关依法审查起诉。 安庆市怀宁县城市管理局党组成员、县城环境 ...

中央纪委国家监委网站讯 中秋、国庆将至，为巩固深入贯彻中央八项规定精神学习教育成果，持续营 造风清气正的节日氛围，山西省纪委监委公开曝光6起违反中央八项规定精神典型问题。具体如下： 1. 山西省公安厅反恐怖总队原总队长成文碧违规收受礼金，借用管理和服务对象车辆和住房，接受可能 影响公正执行公务的宴请和旅游活动安排问题。2018年至2024年，成文碧借逢年过节之机，多次违规收 受管理和服务对象礼金，共计99万余元；长期违规借用私营企业主车辆及1间30多平方米的房屋并配备 家具，供其个人日常使用；多次违规接受私营企业主提供的可能影响公正执行公务的宴请及旅游活动安 排。成文碧还存在其他严重违纪违法问题，2025年8月，被开除党籍，按规定取消其享受的待遇，涉嫌 犯罪问题被移送检察机关依法审查起诉。 2. 太原市人大常委会原副主任、清徐县委原书记王剑峰违规收受礼品，长期在私营企业主提供的专门场 所违规吃喝，违规接受管理和服务对象提供的车辆和司机服务问题。2018年至2023年，王剑峰借逢年过 节之机，多次违规收受管理和服务对象消费卡、高档酒水、黄金制品等礼品，折合共计44万余元；长期 在私营企业主提供的专门场所接受或组 ...

海东市民和回族土族自治县委统战部原副部长、县工商业联合会党组书记乔国林组织公款旅游问 题。2024年5月，乔国林、县工商业联合会秘书长王振国，借福建学习考察之机，组织11名民营企业主 到武夷山、永定土楼、鼓浪屿等景点公款旅游，学习考察费用7.8万元由县工商联支付。2025年8月，乔 国林受到撤销党内职务、政务撤职处分，王振国受到党内严重警告，政务记大过处分，违规款项予以收 缴。 其他2起典型案例分别为：黄南藏族自治州尖扎农商银行党支部书记、董事长韩国智公车私用问 题；果洛藏族自治州玛沁县下大武乡年扎村"两委"违规公款购买加油卡问题。 新华社西宁9月19日电 中秋、国庆节日将至，为进一步严明纪律，持续加固中央八项规定堤坝，释 放全面从严、一严到底的强烈信号，青海省纪委监委通报近期查处的5起违反中央八项规定精神典型问 题。 海西蒙古族藏族自治州政协原党组副书记、副主席张纪元违规接受宴请、收受礼品礼金等问题。 2011年至2024年中秋、国庆等重要节点，张纪元多次接受管理和服务对象在杭州等地安排的宴请；多次 收受管理和服务对象所送高档白酒、茶叶、枸杞、海鲜等礼品及礼金；携亲属多次接受管理和服务对象 在河南、浙江等地 ...

制图：杨盼 其中，形式主义、官僚主义问题方面，查处问题主要集中于"在履职尽责、服务经济社会发展 和生态环境保护方面不担当、不作为、乱作为、假作为，严重影响高质量发展"，批评教育帮 助和处理183人。 享乐主义、奢靡之风问题方面，查处问题主要集中于"违规收送礼金和其他礼品""违规接受管 理和服务对象等宴请""违规发放津补贴或福利"等方面，批评教育帮助和处理人数分别为258 人、120人、33人。 来源：北京日报 日前，北京市纪委监委公布今年1月至7月查处违反中央八项规定精神问题统计指标表。截至7 月31日，累计查处违反中央八项规定精神问题715起，批评教育帮助和处理730人，其中局级 11人、处级161人、科级及以下558人。 在被批评教育帮助和处理的730人中，给予党纪政务处分的569人，其中局级9人、处级97 人、科级及以下463人。查处问题类型包括两大类，即形式主义、官僚主义问题和享乐主义、 奢靡之风问题。 | 问题类型 | 级别 | 形式主义、官僚主义问题 | 享乐主义、奢靡之风问题 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ...

日前，北京市纪委监委公布今年1月至7月查处违反中央八项规定精神问题统计指标表。截至7月31日，累计查处违反中央八项规定精神问题715起，批评教育帮助和 处理730人，其中局级11人、处级161人、科级及以下558人。 来源：北京日报 责编：罗晓霞 校对：赵燕 在被批评教育帮助和处理的730人中，给予党纪政务处分的569人，其中局级9人、处级97人、科级及以下463人。查处问题类型包括两大类，即形式主义、官僚主义 问题和享乐主义、奢靡之风问题。 | 问题类型 | 级别 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 形式主义、官僚主义问题 | 享乐主义、奢靡之风问题 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights multiple violations of the Central Eight Regulations in Jiangyong County, Hunan Province, focusing on the disciplinary actions taken against school officials and other public servants for misconduct related to drinking and misuse of public resources [2][5][10]. Group 1: Violations in Education Sector - The principal and vice-principal of Shangjiangxu Town Middle School were punished for violating regulations by drinking during a team-building event [4][5]. - The event, organized on May 17, aimed to enhance teacher cohesion but resulted in public backlash due to the drinking incident [4][6]. - Disciplinary actions included severe warnings and removal from positions for the principal, while other involved teachers faced corresponding organizational penalties [5][8]. Group 2: Other Violations - Two other cases involved public officials organizing tourism under the guise of party activities, leading to disciplinary warnings [10]. - The former head of the Jiangyong County Highway Maintenance Center and the former party branch secretary were found to have misused public resources for personal leisure [10]. - Additionally, the head of the Jiangyong County Construction Engineering Quality Supervision Station was penalized for accepting gifts that could influence his official duties [11][12].

Core Points - The article reports on the recent disciplinary actions taken by the Hunan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection against several officials for violating the Central Eight Regulations [1][2][3][4][5] Summary by Categories Violations of Central Eight Regulations - Qin Lijun, former Deputy Director of the Shaoyang Municipal People's Congress, accepted banquets and received red envelopes from private business owners, leading to his expulsion from the party and prosecution [1] - Chen Daxiong, former Deputy Secretary and President of Hunan Aviation Technician College, misused public funds for personal dining and travel, and accepted gifts, resulting in his expulsion and legal action [1] - Liu Qunyou, former Secretary of the Party Committee of Xiangtan First People's Hospital, accepted private banquets and gifts from business owners, leading to his expulsion and prosecution [2] - Xiao Junsheng, former Deputy Director of the Hunan Transportation Bureau, accepted banquets and gifts from management and service objects, resulting in expulsion and legal proceedings [2] - Huang Yonghong, former Vice Chairman of the Political Consultative Conference in Miluo City, accepted private banquets and gifts, leading to expulsion and prosecution [3] - Quan Ping, former Director of the Physical Education, Health, and Arts Affairs Center in Yuanling County, accepted banquets and gifts from private business owners, resulting in expulsion and legal action [3] - Chen Zhigang, former Deputy District Head of Lengshuijiang District, accepted a banquet and red envelopes, leading to severe disciplinary action and removal from office [4]

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the violation of the Central Eight Regulations, with specific cases of misconduct by government officials in Zhangjiakou City [1][2] - Wang Hualun, a government official, accepted gifts and money totaling over 30,000 RMB from subordinates and service objects during his tenure from October 2020 to June 2024, leading to his expulsion from the party and public office [1] - Yang Yue, a former health official, received a total of 104,000 RMB in gifts from a private enterprise between 2016 and 2024, also resulting in his expulsion and criminal prosecution [1] Group 2 - The report indicates a persistent risk of regression in adherence to the Central Eight Regulations, emphasizing the need for self-reflection and discipline among party members [2] - The district's disciplinary committee will intensify efforts to combat corruption, particularly focusing on the acceptance of gifts and money, and will implement a dual approach of investigation and treatment to address the root causes of corruption [2]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of implementing the Central Eight Regulations to strengthen the party's governance and maintain public trust, while acknowledging the persistent issues of formalism and bureaucratism among party members and officials [1] - A case study involving a party member, Fan, highlights the failure to enforce environmental regulations despite multiple complaints from the public regarding pollution from a local sand washing factory, illustrating a lack of accountability and effective action [2][3] - There are differing opinions on how to classify Fan's actions, with one view suggesting a violation of work discipline and another advocating for a classification of formalism and bureaucratism due to neglecting public interests [3][4] Group 2 - The distinction between violations of public discipline and work discipline is crucial, as public discipline directly relates to the party's connection with the people and the protection of their interests [4][5] - The criteria for determining violations of public discipline include the nature of the work, subjective awareness of the issues, objective performance, and the impact on public sentiment and interests [5][6] - Fan's behavior is characterized as formalism and bureaucratism, as he failed to take substantive action in response to public complaints, reflecting a distorted sense of responsibility and a lack of genuine engagement with community concerns [6][7]