最高人民检察院检察委员会委员、经济犯罪检察厅（知识产权检察厅）厅长杜学毅在发布会上表示，专 项监督不仅着眼于解决当前存在的突出问题，更注重从制度机制层面剖析根源、堵塞漏洞，推动实现标 本兼治，巩固深化监督成果。 一是深入贯彻落实党中央部署的改革任务。 二是研究制定跨区域涉企案件规范性文件。为解决跨区域 涉企案件办理中的管辖权争议及执法标准不统一等问题，最高检及时总结提炼专项监督开展以来积累的 办案经验，正在研究起草检察机关加强相关法律监督的规范性文件。 三是地方检察机关积极探索长效机制建设。针对专项监督中发现的共性问题和新型挑战，一些省级检察 院通过制定细致的工作指引来统一办案标准。如山东省检察院出台《依法规范办理涉税刑事案件工作指 引》，上海市检察院制发《职务侵占案件高质效办案指引》等，指导高质效办理相关涉企案件。 下一步，检察机关将深化"违规异地执法和趋利性执法司法专项监督"，纠治并举、标本兼治，努力从源 头上推动解决监督难题，积极助推法治化营商环境建设。 ...

五是依法严肃查处严重侵犯企业合法权益的职务犯罪。坚持依法稳慎、务必搞准，重点查办司法工作人员在办理 涉企案件中利用职权徇私枉法、非法拘禁、刑讯逼供、枉法裁判等职务犯罪案件，依法惩治司法腐败、维护司法 二是依法强化对违法查封、扣押、冻结等涉企强制措施的监督。重点监督超权限、超范围、超数额、超时限"查扣 冻"财产等损害企业合法权益的行为，加强对涉案财物移送、流转、处置的监督。重点依法加强对涉企人员违规采 取人身强制措施的监督，监督依法及时解除强制措施。共监督解除、返还违法"查扣冻"26亿余元，依法变更人身 强制措施820余人。如，一起涉嫌犯罪的案件中，立案管辖依据不充分，未经甄别超范围冻结多个企业及相关人员 账户资金，且综合全案认定事实不清、证据不足。检察机关依法监督解除超范围冻结资金6800万余元、对多名公 司高管及代理商及时解除强制措施，并依法对全案作不起诉处理。 三是依法监督清理涉企刑事"挂案"。依法加强对立而不侦、退回补充侦查后长期未重新移送等涉企案件的监督， 重点关注案件既不依法撤销又不移送审查起诉等情形，防止案件长期搁置。共推动清理涉企刑事"挂案"4300余 件。 四是依法纠正以刑事手段插手民事经济纠 ...

南都讯记者刘嫚发自北京 2月2日，最高人民检察院举行新闻发布会，通报2025年全国检察机关开展违规异地执法 和趋利性执法司法专项监督主要情况。最高人民检察院党组成员、副检察长葛晓燕介绍，截至2025年底，全国检 察机关共办理专项监督案件1.9万余件，最高检和各省级检察院挂牌督办交办一批重大典型案件，有力维护企业合 法权益。 此外，葛晓燕还介绍，工作中，检察机关拓展线索发现渠道，通过开设12309专项监督专区、深化与相关单位工作 协作等多种渠道共计收集线索2.9万余个；健全案件督办交办机制，最高检、各省级检察院共确定挂牌督办、交办 案件500余件。其中，最高检直接挂牌督办、交办案件30件。省级检察院紧密结合各地实际，细化深化工作部署， 对最高检挂牌督办案件实行办案院检察长包案办理，对交办案件指派专人全程跟踪指导，一体推进本地区重点案 件办理。 （文章来源：南方都市报） 葛晓燕介绍，2025年，最高人民检察院深入贯彻中央经济工作会议精神，积极参与党中央部署的规范涉企执法专 项行动，自3月起在全国检察机关部署开展"违规异地执法和趋利性执法司法专项监督"。专项监督开展以来，最高 人民检察院综合履行刑事、民事、行政、公 ...

预告时间：2026-02-0210:00 2月2日(星期一)上午10点，最高检举行"迎两会.持续推进习近平法治思想的检察实践"系列新闻发布活动的首场发 布会，主题为"扎实开展违规异地执法和趋利性执法司法专项监督"，通报检察机关开展违规异地执法和趋利性执 法司法专项监督有关情况，发布典型案例，并回答记者提问。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the Intellectual Property Prosecutor's Office by the Supreme People's Procuratorate marks a significant step towards the professionalization and comprehensive development of intellectual property judicial protection in China [1][2] Group 1: Establishment and Functionality - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has recently established the Intellectual Property Prosecutor's Office, which will participate in the supervision of "illegal cross-regional law enforcement and profit-driven law enforcement" [1] - The office aims to enhance the judicial protection of intellectual property rights and will focus on combating new types of crimes involving advanced technologies such as deep linking, web crawling, and electronic intrusion [1] Group 2: Statistics and Trends - In the past year, national procuratorial authorities accepted the arrest of 13,486 individuals for intellectual property crimes and prosecuted 33,805 individuals [2] - Among the types of cases, 81% were related to trademark infringement, with significant increases in copyright and trade secret infringement cases, where joint criminal activity accounted for approximately 80% [2] - The number of cases involving trade secret infringement rose by 12.4% year-on-year, with 163 cases involving 385 individuals in 2024 [2] Group 3: Future Directions - The Supreme People's Procuratorate plans to conduct regular supervision of malicious litigation and deepen collaboration with relevant departments to create a market-oriented, law-based, and international business environment [2]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) has established a specialized Intellectual Property Procuratorate to enhance judicial protection of intellectual property rights in China, marking a shift towards a more professional and comprehensive approach [1] - In the past year, the SPP received and reviewed arrests for 13,486 individuals involved in intellectual property crimes and accepted prosecutions for 33,805 individuals, with 81% of cases related to trademark infringement [2] - The SPP plans to conduct regular supervision of malicious litigation and strengthen collaboration with relevant departments to create a favorable business environment [2] Group 2 - The SPP's focus on new technologies has led to an increase in cases involving intellectual property crimes, with a notable rise in cases related to commercial secrets, which saw a 12.4% increase year-on-year [2] - The SPP aims to enhance oversight of cross-regional cases and clarify the boundaries between different types of crimes related to intellectual property [1]