NFT Collateralization - Quanto aims to unlock capital efficiency using NFT collateral [1] - The platform allows users to use NFT holdings as collateral for trading [1] - This prevents idle value of NFTs and enables participation in various markets [1] Future Plans - Quanto is launching soon [1]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company is targeting significant cost savings in 2025 and has reduced capital spending for 2026, indicating a cautious outlook on macroeconomic conditions [7][8] - There is an expected mid-single-digit drop in demand for the second half of the year, influenced by trade dynamics and seasonality [12][16] - The company anticipates a utilization headwind of approximately $75 million to $100 million in the second half of the year due to inventory reduction efforts [13][14] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The chemical and materials business is facing challenges due to overcapacity from China, impacting profitability [20][21] - The Methanalysis unit is performing well, with expectations of improved profitability through debottlenecking investments [30][32] - The fibers business is experiencing a decline due to tariff impacts and market demand issues, with a projected $20 million headwind from tariffs [56][91] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The automotive market is expected to see low single-digit declines in the back half of the year, influenced by tariff concerns and consumer behavior [50][51] - The consumer durables market is particularly affected by trade dynamics, leading to cautious purchasing behavior among customers [41][42] - The textile market has slowed down significantly due to tariffs, impacting overall demand [57][58] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focusing on cash generation and cost management in response to current market uncertainties [13][17] - There is a strategic emphasis on improving the structural strength of the business and enhancing profitability through targeted investments [22][24] - The company is exploring alternative options for its Methanalysis investments, indicating a flexible approach to capital allocation [34][36] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management acknowledges significant uncertainty in demand due to trade dynamics and macroeconomic factors, emphasizing the need for cautious forecasting [10][15] - There is optimism about potential stabilization in 2026, driven by pro-growth policies and resolution of trade issues [16][17] - The management is committed to maintaining cost discipline and optimizing working capital to navigate the current challenges [45][62] Other Important Information - The company is experiencing volatility in customer demand, particularly in consumer discretionary markets, which are highly sensitive to trade conditions [70][72] - The company has a strong focus on maintaining price-cost stability in its AFP business, which has contributed to its performance [55][56] Q&A Session Summary Question: How representative of the second half should be when thinking about trough earnings levels? - Management indicated that the second half is heavily impacted by trade situations, making it a poor indicator of overall company performance [8][10] Question: How far along is the investment in the Metapasys unit? - Management confirmed that the investment is progressing well, with expectations of significant profitability improvements [18][30] Question: What triggered the change in customer dialogue in July? - Management noted that the trade pause allowed customers to reassess their inventory and demand outlook, leading to a more cautious approach [39][41] Question: Can you provide more color on the automotive end markets? - Management highlighted that while the aftermarket performed well, the interlayer business faced challenges due to production moderation in response to tariffs [49][50] Question: What is the current state of tariffs and their impact on the fibers business? - Management stated that tariffs have significantly impacted the textile market, leading to a cautious outlook for the fibers segment [56][58] Question: What are the expectations for cash flow next year? - Management indicated that while cash flow may decrease due to pulling forward cash flow this year, they expect to build off a stable platform for future growth [62][63]

Partnerships & Integrations - Binance institutional clients now support USYC as off-exchange collateral, unlocking more capital efficient yield with tokenized U S Treasuries [1] - The collaboration brings the power of tokenized traditional assets to one of the largest ecosystems in crypto [1] Product Features - TMMF (Tokenized Money Market Fund) is backed by U S Treasuries [1] - USYC offers near-instant fungibility with USDC [1]

2025 TVL checklist:✅ Yield-bearing assets✅ Protocol-owned✅ Deep trading pairs✅ Generate sustainable rewards✅ Backed by blue chips@katana checks every box.It’s not TVL.It’s bear market-proof capital efficiency. 🍣⚔️ https://t.co/eEAf7Sc8Im ...

Polkadot Strategy Shift - Polkadot is shifting its focus from scaling to reshaping security, identity, and capital efficiency for Web3 needs [1] - The network aims to create a lean, resilient system ready for future Web3 demands [1] Security & Validation - Polkadot plans to reduce its annual security spend from $500 million to $90 million [1] - Polkadot is transitioning towards a Proof-of-Personhood (PoP) + Individuality model, moving away from NPoS [2] - Validators will face higher standards, including KYC and interviews, with fixed fiat rewards around $5,000 per month [3] - Bad validators and their voters can be slashed, with strong anti-sybil protections [3] Technology & Development - "Web3 Outposts" are being developed in Lisbon, Berlin, and Malta to bridge blockchain and real-world collaboration [3] - A native stablecoin is proposed, aiming for capital efficiency, decentralization, scalability, and inclusivity [3] - zkJAM framework is being built using STARKs, starting with storage proofs [3] - JAM specs are documented in a Gray Paper, with governance moving to an editorial board [5]

Greif Inc. Containerboard Divestment Conference Call Summary Company Overview - **Company**: Greif Inc. (GEF) - **Event**: Containerboard Divestment Conference Call - **Date**: July 01, 2025 Key Points Industry and Company Focus - **Divestment Announcement**: Greif announced the divestment of its containerboard business for **$1.8 billion** [4] - **Strategic Rationale**: The divestment aligns with Greif's "build to last" strategy, aimed at enhancing capital efficiency and focusing on high-margin packaging solutions [4][6] - **Remaining Portfolio**: Post-divestment, Greif will concentrate on its URB (Unbleached Recycled Board) business and polymer-based solutions, which are expected to grow faster than GDP [8][9] Financial Implications - **EBITDA and Cash Flow Goals**: Greif aims to achieve **$1 billion** in EBITDA and **$500 million** in free cash flow by 2027 [5] - **Debt Reduction**: 100% of the proceeds from the divestment will be used to pay down debt, positioning Greif with a leverage ratio below **2.0 times** [5][10] - **Cost Savings**: The divestment is expected to lower annual interest expenses by **$85 million** and recurring maintenance capital expenditures by **$25 million** [11] Market Position and Strategy - **Focus on Leadership**: Greif aims to maintain a number one or two position in its chosen markets, emphasizing that it was not a leader in the containerboard market [22][23] - **Growth Areas**: The company is targeting growth in high-margin sectors such as food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, and agrochemicals [9][12] - **Capital Allocation**: Greif will continue to prioritize safety and maintenance CapEx while also increasing shareholder returns through dividends and share repurchases [11][12] Future Outlook - **Growth Opportunities**: Greif is committed to pursuing high-return organic capital expenditures and strategic M&A opportunities within its targeted growth areas [12][41] - **EBITDA Growth Drivers**: The company has identified several drivers to achieve its EBITDA target, including volume growth and business optimization [13][14] - **Market Trends**: North America remains sluggish, particularly in metal markets, but acquired companies in the agricultural space are performing well [90][91] Additional Considerations - **Regulatory Approvals**: The transaction is subject to customary conditions, including regulatory approvals, which may affect the closing timeline [6] - **Synergies and Cost Structure**: Greif will work on optimizing support functions and addressing overhead costs post-divestment [37][65] - **Market Dynamics**: The company expects to be a net seller in the open market for OCC (Old Corrugated Containers) after the divestment, which may impact its business dynamics [61] Conclusion - Greif's divestment of its containerboard business marks a significant strategic shift aimed at enhancing shareholder value and focusing on high-growth, high-margin opportunities. The company is committed to maintaining financial discipline while pursuing growth in its remaining business segments.

Core Viewpoint - Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA) is a significant player in North America's energy infrastructure, managing extensive pipeline systems and gas processing facilities, which are crucial for hydrocarbon logistics across the continent [1][2]. Financial Performance - Pembina reported a strong first-quarter 2025 with adjusted EBITDA of C$1.2 billion, a 12% increase year over year, and earnings of C$502 million, up 15% [4][10]. - The company raised its quarterly dividend by 3% to C$0.71 per share, indicating confidence in cash flow stability [4][10]. - Pembina is trending toward the midpoint of its 2025 EBITDA guidance range of C$4.2 billion to C$4.5 billion, showcasing resilience amid macroeconomic volatility [4]. Strategic Positioning - Pembina secured long-term, take-or-pay agreements with a leading Montney producer, enhancing utilization across its pipeline systems and providing revenue visibility [5]. - The company is advancing a C$4+ billion portfolio of growth projects, including the Taylor-to-Gordondale expansion and Cedar LNG, aimed at capitalizing on rising volumes in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) [6]. - Pembina is diversifying its NGL marketing beyond U.S. markets, leveraging West Coast export capacity to access premium global markets, which enhances long-term resilience [7]. Financial Health - Pembina's debt-to-EBITDA ratio was 3.4x, below its target range, supporting a BBB credit rating [8]. - The company generated meaningful free cash flow in the first quarter, which was allocated to debt reduction and shareholder returns, positioning it for potential acquisitions or share buybacks [8]. Risks and Challenges - Pembina's marketing segment is exposed to commodity price volatility, with management cautioning that lower prices could offset gains later in 2025 [11]. - Regulatory uncertainty regarding Alliance Pipeline tolls could pressure EBITDA, with ongoing reviews adding to the uncertainty [12]. - Delays in partner projects, such as Dow's ethylene cracker, introduce execution risk that could affect cash flows and long-term demand for ethane infrastructure [13]. - The capital-intensive nature of Pembina's growth projects could strain free cash flow if execution challenges arise [15]. - Recent stock performance has shown a decline of 7%, contrasting with a 36.3% gain in its sub-industry, which may reflect investor concerns [16].

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company generated $54 million of operating cash flow before working capital, converting it to $39 million of upstream free cash flow, with a capital expenditure (CapEx) of only 35% reinvested into upstream while keeping volumes mostly flat [24] - Debt was reduced by $21 million quarter over quarter, resulting in a leverage ratio of 0.9 times [24] - Operating costs were lowered, with lease operating expenses (LOE) per barrel of oil equivalent (BOE) at $8.34, a 2% reduction from the previous quarter and an 8% reduction year over year [14] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Net production slightly declined from 1.46 million barrels of oil to 1.41 million barrels quarter over quarter, but increased by 19% year over year from 1.85 million barrels to 2.2 million barrels of oil equivalent [13] - The company completed 10 wells in Q1 2025, with five wells flowing back and expected to begin production in May, while the other five will come online in the second half of 2025 [12][14] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company noted a 10% compression in many service costs compared to the previous year, despite potential tariff impacts [15] - The average daily net production was 15,620 barrels of oil per day and 24,430 barrels of oil equivalent per day for Q1 2025 [14] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company announced a strategic acquisition of Silverback Exploration for $142 million, which includes approximately 47,000 net working interest acres and enhances long-term upstream development potential [5][6] - The focus for the year is on acquiring and preserving high-quality inventory rather than converting inventory to production [9] - The company plans to extend proven processes from Texas to New Mexico, enhancing power generation capabilities [9] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the long-term outlook for the industry and the company, emphasizing a disciplined capital allocation philosophy and a robust hedging profile [9] - The company is adjusting its 2025 CapEx guidance down by $105 million or 50%, including a 41% reduction in upstream CapEx [29] - Management believes that the current market conditions present a better time to procure and preserve inventory [30] Other Important Information - The company achieved a total recordable incident rate of zero for Q1 2025, with 93% safe days [11] - The first phase of the New Mexico gathering and compression project was completed on time and on budget, increasing gas delivery capabilities [19] Q&A Session Summary Question: What do you think the motivation for the seller was regarding the Silverback acquisition? - The seller was a large private equity firm that often focuses on larger entities and exits, and the asset may have been too small for them [41] Question: Does the larger contiguous acreage position change the scope of your midstream project? - The acquisition supports the decision to invest in infrastructure, and additional gathering and compression may be needed over time [46][47] Question: What impact could the Silverback assets have on Riley's borrowing base during the redetermination in the fall? - The PDP value is likely half of the purchase price, and while not counting on it, some incremental benefit is expected [55] Question: Can you discuss how you are thinking about hedging downside risk in the current market environment? - Hedging is viewed as a risk management tool, and the company has hedged oil prices for 70% of forecasted PDP volumes at a weighted average downside price [58][59] Question: Are there any significant permitting differences for power projects in New Mexico versus Texas? - The air permits in New Mexico add a little cost, but overall permitting is looking fine [61]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - Revenue grew by 18% year over year, reaching an annualized run rate of nearly $1,200,000,000 [6] - Fee revenue less production costs (FRLPC) increased by 26%, reaching an annualized run rate of over $460,000,000 [6] - Adjusted EBITDA grew by 100% to an annualized equivalent of approximately $320,000,000 [6] - Achieved positive GAAP net income of $8,000,000, marking the first quarter of profitability as a public company [6][26] - Operating income increased to $48,000,000, up more than five times year over year [26] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - Personal loans volume grew by 17% from year-ago levels, with stable application conversion rates at approximately 1% [24] - Auto loans volumes increased nearly 50% sequentially, with an annualized run rate exceeding $1,100,000,000 [19] - Point of sale lending remains robust, with expectations for continued growth in this segment [19] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - Network volume was $2,400,000,000, slightly below guidance due to lower SFR volume, but grew by 26% year over year excluding SFR [23] - FRLPC as a percentage of network volume rose by 100 basis points year over year to 4.8% [25] - The contribution of lending product fees increased to 77% in the quarter compared to 63% a year ago [25] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company is focused on responsible and profitable growth, balancing growth with profitability [14][15] - Emphasis on leveraging unique data advantages and investments in products to add value to lending partners [14] - The introduction of proactive prescreen products aims to enhance the value proposition for lending partners [12] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management acknowledges heightened macroeconomic uncertainty but remains committed to a prudent growth strategy [10][11] - The company is well-positioned to navigate potential changes in consumer health and credit performance [11] - Full-year guidance reflects momentum and resilience, with expectations for continued growth in personal loans and auto lending [33] Other Important Information - The company raised $800,000,000 in April for personal loan and auto loan ABS programs, demonstrating strong capital efficiency [13] - The balance sheet is anchored by $230,000,000 in cash and $760,000,000 in investments in loans and securities [32] - The company does not plan to raise equity capital in the foreseeable future, indicating a self-funded business model [31][32] Q&A Session Summary Question: How does the company position itself for economic variability at the product level? - Management emphasizes building a long-term business that balances growth and profitability, with a focus on responsible credit underwriting and diversified funding mechanisms [39][40][44] Question: How should prescreening be viewed in terms of scaling and impact on volumes? - Prescreening is expected to significantly lower acquisition costs and enhance customer engagement, contributing positively to the personal loans business [51][52] Question: What are the key drivers behind the addressable markets of personal loans, auto, and POS? - The company aims to enhance customer acquisition and retention through improved marketing strategies and seamless lending experiences across all three markets [60][62]

Financial Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company reported a record quarter in Q4 2024 with oil production of 171,000 barrels per day and total production of 368,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day [9] - Adjusted operating cash flow was $904 million and adjusted free cash flow was $400 million for Q4 2024 [11] - For the full year 2024, the company achieved nearly a 50% increase in performance compared to 2023 without increasing leverage [7][8] Business Line Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company drilled 275 wells in 2024, with CapEx remaining within the guidance range of $1.9 billion to $2.1 billion [10] - Q4 lease operating expenses (LOE) were $5.42 per BOE, cash G&A was $0.93 per BOE, and general production taxes (GPT) were $1.49 per BOE [10] Market Data and Key Metrics Changes - The company expects total production in 2025 to average between 300,000 and 380,000 BOE per day, with oil production averaging between 170,000 and 175,000 barrels per day [21] - The capital program for 2025 is approximately $2 billion, which is less than 2024 despite a higher production base [22] Company Strategy and Development Direction - The company plans to maximize shareholder value through a capital-efficient drilling program in the Delaware Basin [9] - The focus remains on maintaining a strong balance sheet and achieving investment-grade status [27] Management's Comments on Operating Environment and Future Outlook - Management expressed confidence in the sustainability of their operations, citing a strong inventory position and cost control measures [36][12] - The company aims to continue enhancing free cash flow per share, projecting it to nearly double from just over $1 in 2023 to over $2 in 2025 [30] Other Important Information - The company rolled out an enhanced capital return program prioritizing a leading base dividend for shareholders [13] - The company increased liquidity by approximately $1 billion during 2024, maintaining a strong financial position [13] Q&A Session Summary Question: Can you provide insight into target formations and co-development for 2025? - Management indicated that the target formations remain similar to previous years, with a high confidence in a fifteen-year inventory [36] Question: What is the view on larger scale M&A? - Management prefers smaller deals, finding them to offer higher quality inventory and better value, but remains open to larger deals if they align with strategic goals [40] Question: What drives operational efficiency? - The company attributes efficiency gains to a strong culture focused on continuous improvement rather than solely on M&A [45] Question: How do you see shareholder returns evolving? - The base dividend is a core part of the shareholder return strategy, with plans to increase it annually [51] Question: What is the expected CapEx for facilities? - Management expects facility spend to be around $400 million annually, with potential for further reductions in the future [58] Question: What are the drivers behind the reduction in D&C costs? - Approximately 55% of the reduction in D&C costs is attributed to efficiency gains, with the remainder due to cost deflation [71] Question: How does the Midland asset fit into the portfolio? - The Midland asset is not a primary focus but provides a nice cash flow stream and fits well within the overall portfolio [76] Question: What is the strategy for gas realizations? - The company is focused on optimizing gas netbacks, with significant improvements expected in 2026 and beyond [120] Question: How does the balance sheet strategy relate to stock performance? - Management emphasizes that balance sheet strength is about optimizing value creation rather than directly influencing stock trading [127]