Protectionism

Search documents
Trump's H-1B Visa Plan Stuns Big Tech, White House Says $100,000 Fee Is One-Time Only - Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT)
Benzinga· 2025-09-21 02:42
Core Points - President Trump's proposed $100,000 H-1B visa fee has caused confusion among large U.S. companies, leading to a clarification from the White House that it is a one-time fee applicable only at the time of visa petition filing [1][5] - Major companies such as Microsoft, Alphabet, and Amazon have instructed their H-1B employees to return to the U.S. and cancel travel plans following the announcement of the visa fee [2] - The new policy comes amid allegations of discrimination against tech companies, with OpenAI and others accused of prioritizing H-1B applicants in job ads [4] Corporate Impact - As of early 2025, Amazon and its cloud unit AWS had received over 12,000 H-1B approvals, while Microsoft and Meta had each secured over 5,000 approvals [3] - JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs also issued warnings to their H-1B employees regarding the visa fee implications [2] Legal and Political Context - The H-1B visa issue has created divisions within Trump's circle, with figures like Elon Musk advocating for skilled immigration, while others like Vice President J.D. Vance argue for prioritizing American workers [6] - The new policy includes a $1 million "gold card" visa for wealthy investors seeking U.S. citizenship, while existing H-1B holders can continue their usual travel without the new fee applying to them [7]
X @Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph· 2025-09-11 11:30
Economic Policy - Innovation is the optimal approach to enhance the economy [1] - Protectionism negatively impacts the populace [1]
X @CZ 🔶 BNB
CZ 🔶 BNB· 2025-09-11 09:30
Economic Policy - Innovation is the best way to improve the economy [1] - Protectionism harms the economy [1] Market Trends - India's rupee falls to a new record low against the US Dollar [1]
H-1B reality hits home; Games24x7 layoffs
The Economic Times· 2025-09-11 01:30
H-1B Visa Trends - Indian IT services exporters, including Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Infosys, HCLTech, Wipro, Tech Mahindra, and LTIMindtree, have reduced H-1B filings by an average of 46% over five years, with TCS reporting 5,505 H-1B employees last year, second only to Amazon [3][10] - Global peers like Accenture, Capgemini, Cognizant, and IBM have also seen an average drop of 44% in H-1B filings between FY21 and FY25 [3][10] - Big Tech companies are increasing their H-1B sponsorships, with OpenAI filing 76 petitions and Anthropic filing 41 [3][10] Industry Adaptation - Indian software giants are shifting their business models by hiring locally, nearshoring to Mexico and Eastern Europe, and automating core processes due to immigration fatigue, geopolitical unease, and rising protectionism [5][12] - The proposed HIRE Act, which aims to tax US firms that outsource, could further complicate the H-1B landscape [10] Real-Money Gaming Sector - Games24x7 plans to lay off 500 employees, approximately 70% of its workforce, due to a ban on online real-money gaming [5][12] - The gaming sector is facing significant challenges, with over 2,000 professionals actively seeking new jobs following the ban [7][12] - Other companies, such as Mobile Premier League, have also laid off around 60% of their Indian staff due to the new regulations [7][12] AI in Therapy - Demand for online therapy is increasing, with startups like Docvita and Amaha Health reporting user growth of 16% and 80% year-on-year, respectively [8][12] - Startups are developing AI tools to enhance therapy services, including chatbots for matching clients with therapists [8][12]
X @The Economist
The Economist· 2025-08-15 14:00
In the face of tariff threats from America, India has made the protection of its farmers a top priority. Why is the industry so important to the country? https://t.co/7Jxkk3vE8x ...
WSJ Trade Reporter Breaks Down State of U.S. Deals Ahead of Aug. 1 Deadline | WSJ News
WSJ News· 2025-07-30 21:45
Trade Policy & Deadlines - The US is approaching an August 1st deadline for imposing reciprocal tariffs on nations without trade agreements [1] - Multiple trade deals have been made leading up to the August 1st deadline, including deals in Southeast Asia and with the European Union [2][3] - A deal with India seems unlikely, with potential for a 25% reciprocal tariff [3] - The August 1st deadline is firm and will not be extended [4] China Trade Relations - Tariffs on goods from China currently range from 50% to 55%, depending on the product [5] - The deadline for Chinese tariffs is August 12th, with potential for extension by 90 days [5][6] - If no agreement is reached and the deadline isn't extended, tariffs on China could increase from 50-55% to 80-85% [6] - US and Chinese delegations are in meetings to avoid escalating the trade war [6][7] Overall Impact - US tariffs are expected to be significantly higher than when the Trump administration took office [8] - The US is becoming a more protectionist economy [9]
X @The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal· 2025-07-25 00:49
Trade Policy & History - Ronald Reagan agreed to cap Japanese auto imports in 1981 as a compromise [1] - Reagan hated the auto import cap deal and considered it a compromise [1] Political Perspective - The Wall Street Journal's opinion suggests Ronald Reagan was not a protectionist [1]
X @Bloomberg
Bloomberg· 2025-07-23 21:17
US industries and protectionists are raising alarms with Donald Trump’s pact with Japan, saying it risks undercutting his stated goals of rebalancing America’s trading relationships and reviving domestic manufacturing https://t.co/iEGSM79QBR ...
Trade Tensions Hurting ZIM's Outlook: What's the Road Ahead?
ZACKS· 2025-07-15 15:01
Core Viewpoint - ZIM Integrated Shipping is facing challenges in 2025 due to ongoing tariff tensions, which have negatively impacted its operations and financial outlook after a strong performance in 2024 driven by elevated freight rates from the Red Sea Shipping crisis [1][4]. Group 1: Trade Tensions and Operational Challenges - ZIM has significant exposure to both China and the United States, and ongoing trade tensions are adversely affecting transpacific volumes [2][3]. - The current U.S. administration's protectionist policies, including new port fees for Chinese-linked ships, pose operational and financial challenges for ZIM, as over 50% of its U.S. port calls are made by Chinese-built ships [3][4]. - The absence of a long-term trade deal continues to create uncertainty for ZIM's operations, leading to a cautious outlook for 2025 [2][4]. Group 2: Financial Projections - ZIM's adjusted EBITDA for 2025 is projected to be in the range of $1.6 billion to $2.2 billion, a significant decrease from $3.7 billion in 2024, which represented a year-over-year increase of 252% [4][9]. - Adjusted EBIT for 2025 is expected to be between $350 million and $950 million, down from $2.55 billion in 2024 [4][9]. - Management has indicated that declining freight rates could further pressure ZIM's future earnings [4]. Group 3: Market Performance - ZIM's shares have declined by 26.7% year-to-date, underperforming the broader Transportation-Shipping industry's growth of 0.2% during the same period [7][9]. - From a valuation perspective, ZIM trades at a 12-month forward price-to-sales ratio of 0.3X, indicating it is inexpensive compared to its industry peers [10].
Traveling To China, Nvidia's Jensen Huang Embraces Economic Reality
Forbes· 2025-07-14 18:05
Core Perspective - Nvidia co-founder Jensen Huang's trip to China is seen as a strategic move to expand in a crucial market for U.S. companies, emphasizing the importance of economic interconnection for global peace and prosperity [2][3]. Group 1: Strategic Importance of Nvidia - Senators Elizabeth Warren and Jim Banks acknowledge the strategic importance of Nvidia's advanced AI hardware, particularly its GPUs, but fail to grasp the broader implications of global economic collaboration [4]. - The U.S. Department of Commerce restricts Nvidia's ability to sell advanced chips to China, which may inadvertently benefit the Chinese Communist Party by pushing U.S. technology out of the Chinese market [6][7]. - Chinese technologists have a strong desire for American innovation, and U.S. political actions may hinder Nvidia's growth opportunities in China, which will continue to develop regardless of U.S. involvement [8][9]. Group 2: Consequences of Protectionism - The global market will inevitably see Nvidia's technology, regardless of U.S. restrictions, as competitors will find ways to innovate and fill the void left by U.S. companies [9][10]. - Protectionist measures have historically allowed companies like Huawei to thrive independently, demonstrating that such policies can backfire and lead to increased competition from non-U.S. firms [10][11]. - Huang's recognition of the necessity for Nvidia to engage with Chinese talent is crucial for the company's survival and competitiveness in the global AI landscape [11][12].