The first-ever AVAX ETF is now tradable on @Nasdaq.Introducing $VAVX from @vaneck_us. https://t.co/CwfzDTefaL ...

💥NEW: JAPAN'S SBI FILES FOR DUAL-ASSET CRYPTO ETF COMBINING $BTC AND $XRPAccording to various reports, including @Coindesk, Japan's SBI Group has filed for a dual-asset crypto ETF combining $BTC and $XRP in a single regulated product.The Tokyo-based financial giant had previously announced its intent to launch crypto-asset-linked investment trusts and ETFs upon regulatory approval from the Financial Services Agency (FSA) in Tokyo.With the latest update, the company has moved a step closer towards accomplish ...

Zambia plans new listings including a gold-linked ETF this year as it seeks to tap into precious metal rally and build on momentum https://t.co/HsygtT0vqB ...

Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core Viewpoints - The median weekly return of equity ETFs last week was 0.95%. Among broad-based ETFs, the CSI 500 ETF had the highest return; among sector ETFs, the cyclical ETF had the highest return; among hot theme ETFs, the photovoltaic ETF had the highest return. Equity ETFs had a net redemption of 338.098 billion yuan last week. Among broad-based ETFs, the CSI 500 ETF had the least net redemption; among sector ETFs, the cyclical ETF had the most net subscriptions; among theme ETFs, the chip ETF had the most net subscriptions. As of last Friday, Huaxia, E Fund, and Huatai-PineBridge ranked in the top three in terms of the total scale of listed non-monetary ETFs. Six ETFs will be issued this week [1][2][58]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs ETF Performance - The median weekly return of equity ETFs from January 19 to January 23, 2026, was 0.95%. Among broad-based ETFs, the CSI 500, CSI 1000, Science and Technology Innovation Board, A500, ChiNext, CSI 300, and SSE 50 ETFs had median returns of 4.34%, 2.88%, 2.46%, 0.78%, -0.34%, -0.60%, and -1.55% respectively. Commodity, bond, money market, and cross-border ETFs had median returns of 7.51%, 0.11%, 0.02%, and -0.67% respectively. By sector, the median returns of cyclical, technology, large finance, and consumer sector ETFs were 3.52%, 0.62%, -0.73%, and -0.95% respectively. By hot theme, the median returns of photovoltaic, military, and chip ETFs were 6.87%, 5.30%, and 2.34% respectively, showing relatively strong performance, while the median returns of bank, liquor, and pharmaceutical ETFs were -2.65%, -1.66%, and -1.53% respectively, showing relatively weak performance [12][15]. ETF Scale Changes and Net Subscriptions/Redeemptions - As of last Friday, the scales of equity, cross-border, and bond ETFs were 352.9 billion yuan, 104.47 billion yuan, and 73.46 billion yuan respectively, while the scales of commodity and money market ETFs were relatively small, at 30.76 billion yuan and 15.35 billion yuan respectively. Among broad-based ETFs, the CSI 300 and A500 ETFs had relatively large scales of 85.38 billion yuan and 28.23 billion yuan respectively, while the Science and Technology Innovation Board, CSI 500, ChiNext, SSE 50, and CSI 1000 ETFs had relatively small scales of 20.23 billion yuan, 19.8 billion yuan, 14.47 billion yuan, 12.89 billion yuan, and 11.2 billion yuan respectively. By sector, the technology sector ETF had a scale of 55.15 billion yuan, followed by the cyclical sector ETF with a scale of 31.76 billion yuan. The consumer and large finance ETFs had relatively small scales of 19.71 billion yuan and 19.69 billion yuan respectively. By hot theme, the chip, securities, and pharmaceutical ETFs had the highest scales of 19.25 billion yuan, 14.05 billion yuan, and 11.16 billion yuan respectively. Last week, equity ETFs had a net redemption of 338.098 billion yuan, and the total scale decreased by 309.829 billion yuan; money market ETFs had a net subscription of 199.5 million yuan, and the total scale increased by 200.9 million yuan. Among broad-based ETFs, the CSI 500 ETF had the least net redemption of 8.427 billion yuan, and its scale decreased by 302 million yuan; the CSI 300 ETF had the most net redemption of 237.252 billion yuan, and its scale decreased by 243.481 billion yuan. By sector, the cyclical ETF had the most net subscriptions of 29.338 billion yuan, and its scale increased by 42.211 billion yuan; the large finance ETF had the least net subscriptions of 1.979 billion yuan, and its scale increased by 230 million yuan. By hot theme, the chip ETF had the most net subscriptions of 12.774 billion yuan, and its scale increased by 15.931 billion yuan; the new energy vehicle ETF had the most net redemptions of 240 million yuan, and its scale decreased by 85 million yuan [18][25][27]. ETF Benchmark Index Valuation - As of last Friday, the price-to-earnings ratios of the SSE 50, CSI 300, CSI 500, CSI 1000, ChiNext, and A500 ETFs were at the 80.28%, 84.90%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 68.32%, and 97.45% quantiles respectively, and the price-to-book ratios were at the 54.08%, 72.03%, 100.00%, 85.48%, 68.81%, and 97.70% quantiles respectively. Since December 31, 2019, the price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios of the Science and Technology Innovation Board ETFs are currently at the 95.38% and 83.91% quantiles respectively. As of last Friday, the price-to-earnings ratios of the cyclical, large finance, consumer, and technology sector ETFs were at the 90.35%, 22.77%, 33.17%, and 98.27% quantiles respectively, and their price-to-book ratios were at the 93.65%, 41.50%, 37.21%, and 99.01% quantiles respectively. Compared with the previous week, the valuation quantiles of consumer ETFs decreased significantly. As of last Friday, the price-to-earnings ratio quantiles of military, photovoltaic, and chip ETFs were relatively high, at 99.83%, 99.83%, and 99.09% respectively; the price-to-book ratio quantiles of robot, AI, and military ETFs were relatively high, at 99.83%, 99.42%, and 93.23% respectively. Compared with the previous week, the valuation quantiles of bank ETFs decreased significantly. Overall, among broad-based ETFs, the valuation quantiles of ChiNext and SSE 50 ETFs were relatively low; by sector, the valuation quantiles of large finance and consumer ETFs were relatively moderate; by sub-theme, the valuation quantiles of liquor and new energy vehicle ETFs were relatively low [33][35][45]. ETF Margin Trading and Short Selling - Overall, the margin balance and short selling volume of equity ETFs have both increased in the past year. As of last Thursday, the margin balance of equity ETFs decreased from 53.91 billion yuan in the previous week to 53.456 billion yuan, and the short selling volume increased from 2.276 billion shares in the previous week to 2.303 billion shares. Among the top 10 ETFs with the highest average daily margin purchases and short selling volumes from last Monday to Thursday, the Science and Technology Innovation Board ETF and the CSI 500 ETF had relatively high average daily margin purchases, and the CSI 1000 ETF and the CSI 500 ETF had relatively high average daily short selling volumes [46][47][51]. ETF Managers - As of last Friday, Huaxia Fund ranked first in the total scale of listed non-monetary ETFs and had a relatively high management scale in multiple sub-fields such as scale index ETFs, theme, style, and strategy index ETFs, and cross-border ETFs; E Fund ranked second in the total scale of listed non-monetary ETFs and had a relatively high management scale in scale index ETFs and cross-border ETFs; Huatai-PineBridge Fund ranked third in the total scale of listed non-monetary ETFs and had a relatively high management scale in scale index ETFs and theme, style, and strategy index ETFs. Nine new ETFs were established last week, and six ETFs will be issued this week [52][55].

Core Insights - The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY) achieved a total return of 17.72% for the year 2025, including dividends [1] Group 1 - The performance of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust reflects a strong market environment in 2025 [1] - The return figure indicates positive investor sentiment and market conditions during the year [1] - Dividends contributed to the overall return, highlighting the importance of income generation in investment strategies [1]

Core Insights - The article discusses two cryptocurrency ETFs: Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI), highlighting their different investment approaches and performance metrics [2][4]. Group 1: ETF Comparison - FBTC tracks the spot price of Bitcoin, while WGMI invests in companies involved in Bitcoin mining and infrastructure [2]. - FBTC has an expense ratio of 0.25% and an AUM of $17.41 billion, whereas WGMI has a higher expense ratio of 0.75% and an AUM of $341.93 million [3]. - Over the past year, FBTC has returned -14.53%, while WGMI has achieved a return of 92.48% [3]. Group 2: Performance Metrics - FBTC has a maximum drawdown of -32.64% over two years, while WGMI has a more significant drawdown of -62.79% [5]. - An investment of $1,000 in FBTC would have grown to $1,922 over two years, compared to $2,604 for WGMI [5]. Group 3: Holdings and Strategy - WGMI currently invests in 25 companies, primarily in the technology sector, with top holdings including IREN Ltd., Cipher Mining, and Hut 8 Corp. [6]. - FBTC is a single-asset trust that solely tracks Bitcoin's price and has increased by 85.57% since its inception [6]. Group 4: Market Dynamics - WGMI may transition away from being solely a Bitcoin mining ETF as companies within it diversify into high-performance computing and AI data center operations [9][10]. - This transition could provide indirect exposure to the crypto market while addressing environmental concerns associated with mining [10].

【美投Pro——让你安心投资！】 华人投资者的专业股票研究平台，新用户7天免费试用~ 详情点击：https://www.jdbinvesting.com/?utm_source=mtq&utm_campaign=01242026_ETF&utm_medium=yt_week_desc 服务包括： ✅ Pro股票：热门个股绝对跟踪；每月发掘个股机会 ✅ Pro市场：每月分享宏观报告；市场热点深度解析 ✅ ProETF：发掘ETF机会和玩法；安心赚取被动收入 ✅ Pro新闻：每日分享新闻总结；个股异动及时解析 ✅ Pro学堂：从入门到精通，系统性学习美股投资 ✅ Pro问答：美投团队每日分享投资观点，专业数据，数千投资者共同交流 ✅ Pro交易：美投君个人交易实时分享，实践中交流投资 现已有500+期深度分析视频，以及10000+条文字分析，快来体验一下吧~ 【美投Pro】试看样片： 后现代周期 https://youtu.be/oVcFIiWpfW0?si=uxUJGLx_QSCVmvMJ 电动车投资 https://youtu.be/UPTGSoSjJI4?si=lw_0Yl0ovuyivkX3 战胜华尔街 ...

🚨 UPDATE: The BTC ETFs saw weekly Net Outflows of over $1.3B.Eradicating almost all of the inflows from the previous week. https://t.co/U8gxliU565 ...

LATEST: ⚡ Asset manager Grayscale has filed with the SEC for a spot BNB ETF, the Grayscale BNB Trust, that would trade on the Nasdaq under the ticker GBNB. https://t.co/Le9DRgf67u ...

On Jan. 23 (ET), spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of $104 million, marking a fifth consecutive day of outflows. Spot Ethereum ETFs saw net outflows of $41.74 million, extending to four straight days. Meanwhile, Solana spot ETFs posted $1.87 million in net inflows, while XRP spot ETFs saw $3.43 million in net inflows.https://t.co/QHxqsa3V6q ...