Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the United States' assistance to Ukraine in conducting long-range strikes against Russian energy facilities, highlighting the sharing of intelligence and operational planning involvement by the U.S. [1] Group 1: U.S. Involvement - The U.S. has been closely involved in the planning of operations, including determining flight paths, altitudes, and timing for strikes against Russian energy infrastructure [1] - Intelligence sharing has enabled Ukraine to target significant energy facilities, including several refineries located far from the front lines [1] Group 2: Reactions and Context - U.S. and Ukrainian officials have not commented on the reports, while Russian officials have indicated that the U.S. has been providing intelligence to Ukraine for some time [1] - The article references a shift in the stance of former President Trump regarding the conflict, noting his commitment to resolving the issue and recent statements about Ukraine's potential to reclaim territory with NATO and EU support [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the United States' assistance to Ukraine in conducting remote strikes on Russian energy facilities, highlighting the intelligence-sharing and operational planning involved in these actions [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Involvement - The U.S. has been closely involved in planning operations for Ukraine to strike important Russian energy facilities, including several refineries, by sharing intelligence and determining flight paths, altitudes, and timing for attacks [1]. - Reports indicate that the U.S. has been providing intelligence to Ukraine for several months to support these remote strikes against Russian energy infrastructure [3]. Group 2: Russian Response - The Russian government has acknowledged that the U.S. has been regularly providing intelligence to Ukraine, with officials claiming that NATO and the U.S. utilize all available infrastructure to gather and share this information [3].

Core Viewpoint - The potential provision of "Tomahawk" missiles to Ukraine by the U.S. could escalate tensions in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, with implications for U.S.-Russia relations and military dynamics in the region [1][4]. Group 1: U.S. Position - U.S. President Trump indicated that if the Russia-Ukraine conflict remains unresolved, he might inform President Putin of his intention to supply "Tomahawk" missiles to Ukraine, which Ukraine desires to enhance its combat capabilities [1]. - Vice President Vance previously mentioned that the U.S. is considering supplying "Tomahawk" cruise missiles capable of reaching Moscow through NATO European member states [1]. Group 2: Ukraine's Response - Ukrainian President Zelensky expressed that Ukraine is still awaiting Trump's final decision regarding the provision of "Tomahawk" missiles, emphasizing their commitment to using these missiles solely against Russian military targets, including potential strikes on oil refineries [3]. Group 3: Russia's Reaction - Russian Presidential Press Secretary Peskov stated that the potential delivery of "Tomahawk" missiles to Ukraine has raised significant concerns in Russia, asserting that such weapons, while capable of being non-nuclear, would not alter the front-line situation [4]. - Peskov highlighted the ongoing tense situation and Russia's willingness to seek a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine issue, noting that Trump has shown a political willingness to return to negotiations, unlike European nations and the Kyiv regime [4]. - Russian officials have raised alarms about the implications of long-range missiles potentially carrying nuclear capabilities, stressing the need for careful assessment by military experts [4].

Core Insights - The article discusses the U.S. assistance to Ukraine in conducting remote strikes on Russian energy facilities, highlighting the intelligence sharing and operational planning involved [1][3] Group 1: U.S. Involvement - The U.S. has been closely involved in the planning of operations, including determining flight paths, altitudes, and timing for strikes on Russian energy infrastructure [1] - Intelligence sharing between the U.S. and Ukraine has enabled Ukraine to target significant energy facilities far from the front lines, including several refineries [1] Group 2: Russian Response - Russian officials have acknowledged that the U.S. has been providing intelligence to Ukraine, with claims that this has been ongoing for some time [3] - The Kremlin has accused NATO and the U.S. of utilizing all available infrastructure to gather and relay intelligence to Ukraine [3] Group 3: Political Context - The article references former U.S. President Trump's campaign promises regarding the resolution of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, noting a lack of substantial progress since he took office [3] - During the recent UN General Assembly, Trump reiterated the U.S. commitment to continue supplying weapons to NATO [3]

每经编辑｜陈柯名 潘海福 当地时间12日，美国总统特朗普表示，若俄乌冲突无法解决，他可能会向乌克兰提供"战斧"导弹。 图片来源：视觉中国 特朗普作出此番发言时，其正乘坐专机飞往以色列的途中。特朗普当天对记者说："如果俄乌冲突无法解决，我可能会告诉（俄罗斯总统）普京，我可能 会向乌克兰提供'战斧'导弹。" 此外特朗普还表示，乌克兰方面希望获得"战斧"导弹，这将提高其作战能力。 此前在9月28日，美国副总统万斯称，美国正在考虑通过北约欧洲成员国向乌克兰提供射程可覆盖俄罗斯首都莫斯科的"战斧"巡航导弹。 据介绍，"战斧"巡航导弹是美国制造的亚音速远程巡航导弹，通常从舰艇和潜艇发射，主要用于海军部署，也有陆基型号，其最大射程超过2000公里。 泽连斯基称，"我们正在为此努力，并期待积极结果。"此外他表示，乌方将仅使用战斧导弹打击俄军事目标，其中也可能包括炼油厂。 当地时间10月12日，总台记者获悉，俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫在接受记者采访时表示，关于"战斧"导弹可能交付给乌克兰的议题已引发俄方高度关 切。俄总统普京此前已指出这种远程武器的特殊性，它可以是非核武器，也可以配置核武器。但它无法改变前线战局。 佩斯科夫强调 ...

Core Viewpoint - The potential provision of "Tomahawk" missiles to Ukraine by the U.S. could escalate tensions between the U.S. and Russia, with both sides expressing strong concerns about the implications of such a move [2][6]. Group 1: U.S. Position - President Trump indicated that if the Russia-Ukraine conflict remains unresolved, he might inform President Putin about the possibility of supplying "Tomahawk" missiles to Ukraine, which Ukraine desires to enhance its combat capabilities [2][4]. - Vice President Pence mentioned on September 28 that the U.S. is considering providing "Tomahawk" cruise missiles capable of reaching Moscow to Ukraine [2]. Group 2: Ukraine's Response - Ukrainian President Zelensky expressed that Ukraine is still waiting for Trump's final decision regarding the provision of "Tomahawk" missiles and is hopeful for a positive outcome [4]. - Zelensky stated that Ukraine would only use the "Tomahawk" missiles to target Russian military objectives, which may include oil refineries [4]. Group 3: Russia's Reaction - Kremlin spokesperson Peskov emphasized that the potential delivery of "Tomahawk" missiles to Ukraine has raised significant concerns in Russia, asserting that such weapons cannot change the front-line situation [6][7]. - Peskov reiterated Russia's willingness to seek a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine issue, while noting that the U.S. has shown a need to return to the negotiation table [6]. - Russian officials highlighted the risks associated with long-range missiles potentially carrying nuclear capabilities, stressing the need for careful consideration of the implications [7].

泽连斯基称，"我们正在为此努力，并期待积极结果。"此外他表示，乌方将仅使用战斧导弹打击俄军事 目标，其中也可能包括炼油厂。 特朗普作出此番发言时，其正乘坐专机飞往以色列的途中。特朗普当天对记者说："如果俄乌冲突无法 解决，我可能会告诉（俄罗斯总统）普京，我可能会向乌克兰提供'战斧'导弹。" 此外特朗普还表示，乌克兰方面希望获得"战斧"导弹，这将提高其作战能力。 △美总统专机 乌克兰总统泽连斯基当天在接受采访时表示，仍在等待美国总统特朗普向乌克兰提供"战斧"导弹的最终 决定。 当地时间12日，美国总统特朗普表示，若俄乌冲突无法解决，他可能会向乌克兰提供"战斧"导弹。 美国副总统万斯9月底向媒体表示，白宫正在考虑通过北约欧洲成员国向乌克兰提供射程可覆盖俄罗斯 首都莫斯科的"战斧"巡航导弹。特朗普10月6日在白宫表示，已就是否向乌克兰提供"战斧"导弹作出了"某种 决定"。 10月2日，俄罗斯总统普京在俄智库"瓦尔代国际辩论俱乐部"第22届年会全会活动上表示，如果美国向 乌克兰提供"战斧"导弹，将进一步损害俄美关系，"破坏俄美关系中刚刚出现的曙光"。俄外交部发言人扎哈 罗娃8日表示，如果美国向乌克兰提供"战斧"巡航导 ...

"如果俄乌冲突无法解决，我可能会告诉（俄罗斯总统）普京，我可能会向乌克兰提供'战斧'导弹。" 特朗普在乘坐专机飞往以色列 的途中对记者表示。 特朗普表示，乌克兰方面希望获得"战斧"导弹，这将提高其作战能力。 特朗普还表示，美国不会直接向乌克兰出售导弹，而是将导弹提供给北约，然后北约再将导弹提供给乌克兰。 乌克兰总统泽连斯基同日在接受采访时表示，仍在等待美国总统特朗普向乌克兰提供"战斧"导弹的最终决定。泽连斯基称，乌方将仅使用战 斧导弹打击俄军事目标，其中也可能包括炼油厂。 特朗普6日在白宫表示，已就是否向乌克兰提供"战斧"导弹作出了"某种决定"。他同时表示，在同意提供战斧导弹之前，他想知道乌克兰打 算如何使用这些导弹，因为他不想让俄罗斯和乌克兰之间的战争升级。 此前在9月28日，美国副总统万斯称，美国正在考虑通过北约欧洲成员国向乌克兰提供射程可覆盖俄罗斯首都莫斯科的"战斧"巡航导弹。 综合央视新闻等媒体报道，当地时间12日， 美国总统特朗普表示，若俄乌冲突无法解决，他可能会向乌克兰提供"战斧"导弹 。 当地时间10月12日，克里姆林宫表示，俄罗斯对美国可能向乌克兰提供"战斧"巡航导弹的前景深感忧虑，并警告称， ...

Group 1 - Ukrainian President Zelensky is awaiting a final decision from US President Trump regarding the provision of "Tomahawk" missiles to Ukraine, emphasizing that they will only target Russian military objectives [1] - Trump indicated that if the Russia-Ukraine conflict remains unresolved, he may inform President Putin about the potential provision of "Tomahawk" missiles to Ukraine, which would enhance Ukraine's combat capabilities [1] - The US Vice President previously mentioned that the US is considering supplying "Tomahawk" cruise missiles capable of reaching Moscow through NATO European member states [1] Group 2 - The "Tomahawk" cruise missile is a subsonic long-range missile manufactured by the US, with a maximum range exceeding 2000 kilometers, typically launched from naval vessels and submarines [2] - Russian officials have expressed significant concern regarding the potential delivery of "Tomahawk" missiles to Ukraine, with President Putin stating that such weapons would not change the frontline situation [2] - Recent reports indicate that Russian forces have launched offensives in multiple directions, destroying a significant amount of Ukrainian military equipment and targeting energy infrastructure in Ukraine [2]

Group 1 - Gold prices surged over 0.8%, surpassing $4050 per ounce, with a peak of $4060, while COMEX gold rose over 1.7%, exceeding $4070 per ounce [1] - The global capital markets experienced a significant decline due to escalating trade tensions, with the S&P 500, Nasdaq, and Dow Jones dropping 2.71%, 3.56%, and 1.90% respectively [3] - U.S. stock index futures showed signs of recovery, despite ongoing uncertainties regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict [4] Group 2 - President Trump indicated the possibility of supplying Ukraine with Tomahawk missiles if the Russia-Ukraine conflict remains unresolved, which could enhance Ukraine's combat capabilities [4] - Russian President Putin warned that U.S. provision of Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine would further damage U.S.-Russia relations [5] - Analysts suggest that while external trade uncertainties may cause emotional disturbances in the market, the medium-term outlook for A-shares remains optimistic due to policy support [5]