Core Insights - The individual has a decade of experience in a Big 4 audit firm, focusing on banking, mining, and energy sectors, which provides a strong foundation in finance and strategy [1] - Currently serves as the Head of Finance for a leading retail real estate owner and operator, overseeing complex financial operations and strategy [1] - Active investor in the U.S. stock market for 13 years, with a portfolio that reflects a balanced approach, emphasizing value stocks while maintaining exposure to growth opportunities [1] - Investment philosophy is based on thorough research and a long-term perspective, aiding in navigating various market cycles successfully [1] - Aims to uncover promising under-the-radar stocks that may not yet be recognized by the broader market [1] - Background in auditing and finance, combined with hands-on investing experience, allows for unique insights and actionable ideas for investors [1]

Core Insights - The iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (IJS) is a passively managed ETF launched on July 24, 2000, with assets exceeding $6.39 billion, making it a significant player in the Small Cap Value segment of the US equity market [1] Investment Potential - Small cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations below $2 billion, present high potential but also come with elevated risks [2] - Value stocks typically exhibit lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, along with lower sales and earnings growth rates, but have historically outperformed growth stocks in most markets, although they may lag in strong bull markets [3] Cost Structure - The annual operating expenses for IJS are 0.18%, positioning it as one of the more cost-effective options in the ETF space, with a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.80% [4] Sector Allocation and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising approximately 22.20% of the portfolio, followed by Industrials and Consumer Discretionary [5] - Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP) represents about 1.46% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for roughly 3.81% of total assets under management [6] Performance Metrics - IJS aims to replicate the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, having experienced a year-to-date loss of approximately -2.64% and a one-year gain of about 10.11% as of July 11, 2025, with a trading range between $83.54 and $118.05 over the past 52 weeks [7] - The ETF has a beta of 1.06 and a standard deviation of 22.49% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile with effective diversification across 471 holdings [8] Alternatives - IJS holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating strong potential based on expected returns, expense ratios, and momentum, making it a favorable option for investors interested in the Small Cap Value segment [9] - Other comparable ETFs include the iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) with $11.56 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.24%, and the Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) with $30.66 billion in assets and a lower expense ratio of 0.07% [10] Conclusion - Passively managed ETFs like IJS are gaining popularity among retail and institutional investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11]

Core Viewpoint - The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) is a significant investment vehicle for exposure to the Mid Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with over $7.93 billion in assets under management, making it one of the larger ETFs in this category [1]. Group 1: Mid Cap Value Characteristics - Mid cap companies, with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, are seen as having higher growth prospects compared to large cap companies while being less risky than small cap companies, providing a balance of stability and growth potential [2]. - Value stocks, characterized by lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, typically exhibit lower sales and earnings growth rates. Historically, value stocks have outperformed growth stocks in most markets, although they may underperform during strong bull markets [3]. Group 2: Costs and Performance - The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.18%, which is competitive within its peer group, and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.84% [4]. - The ETF aims to match the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, which measures the mid-capitalization value sector of the U.S. equity market. As of July 10, 2025, the ETF has returned approximately 2.87% year-to-date and 16.11% over the past year, with a trading range of $103.88 to $135.52 in the last 52 weeks [7][8]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising about 20.30% of the portfolio, followed by Industrials and Consumer Discretionary [5]. - Among individual holdings, Us Foods Holding Corp (USFD) represents about 1.28% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 7.77% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Alternatives and Market Position - The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a favorable position based on expected returns, expense ratios, and momentum [10]. - Other alternatives in the mid-cap value ETF space include the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) with $13.53 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.23%, and the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) with $18.11 billion in assets and a lower expense ratio of 0.07% [11]. Group 5: Investor Appeal - Passively managed ETFs like IJJ are increasingly favored by retail and institutional investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12].

Core Insights - Euronet Worldwide (EEFT) is currently viewed as a better value investment compared to Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) based on various financial metrics and analyst outlooks [1][7]. Valuation Metrics - EEFT has a forward P/E ratio of 10.77, significantly lower than COIN's forward P/E of 120.54, indicating that EEFT is more attractively priced relative to its earnings [5]. - The PEG ratio for EEFT is 0.72, while COIN's PEG ratio is 44.98, suggesting that EEFT is expected to grow its earnings at a more favorable rate compared to its current valuation [5]. - EEFT's P/B ratio stands at 3.52, compared to COIN's P/B of 8.66, further highlighting EEFT's relative undervaluation [6]. Analyst Outlook - EEFT holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings estimate revision trend, while COIN has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold), reflecting a less favorable outlook [3]. - The overall valuation figures and solid earnings outlook position EEFT as the superior value option in the current market [7].

Core Insights - The article compares Manulife Financial (MFC) and Sun Life (SLF) to determine which stock offers better value for investors [1] Valuation Metrics - MFC has a forward P/E ratio of 10.43, while SLF has a forward P/E of 11.90 [5] - MFC's PEG ratio is 1.04, compared to SLF's PEG ratio of 1.70 [5] - MFC's P/B ratio is 1.63, whereas SLF's P/B ratio is 2.34 [6] Investment Ratings - MFC currently holds a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings outlook, while SLF has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3] - Based on valuation metrics, MFC has a Value grade of A, while SLF has a Value grade of C [6]

Core Insights - Vontier Corporation (VNT) and Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) are both currently rated with a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating positive earnings outlooks for both companies [3] - Value investors utilize various metrics to identify undervalued stocks, including P/E ratio, P/S ratio, earnings yield, and cash flow per share [4] Valuation Metrics - VNT has a forward P/E ratio of 12.25, significantly lower than DUOL's forward P/E of 138.78, suggesting VNT is more attractively priced [5] - The PEG ratio for VNT is 1.31, while DUOL's PEG ratio stands at 3.09, indicating VNT's expected earnings growth is more favorable [5] - VNT's P/B ratio is 5.01 compared to DUOL's P/B of 20.48, further supporting VNT's stronger valuation metrics [6] - Based on these valuation figures, VNT is rated with a Value grade of A, while DUOL has a Value grade of F, highlighting VNT as the superior value option [6]

Market Overview - The Nasdaq and S&P 500 reached new highs at the end of June 2025, with the Nasdaq up 33% since April 8 and the S&P 500 up 25%, largely driven by significant gains from Nvidia and other tech stocks [1] - There may be selling pressure and volatility as the market approaches the second quarter earnings season in mid-July [1] Economic Context - Trade deals, cooling inflation, and strong earnings growth expectations create a bullish environment for Wall Street as summer begins [2] - Investors are encouraged to seek stocks that combine compelling value with improving earnings outlooks for potential buying opportunities in July and beyond [2] Value Stock Screening - The value stock screen utilizes Zacks Rank 1 (Strong Buys) or 2 (Buys) and focuses on stocks with price-to-earnings (P/E) and price-to-sales (P/S) ratios below the industry median [4][8] - The screening process also considers quarterly earnings rates above the industry median and incorporates upgrades and estimate revisions to identify the top seven stocks [5][8] Featured Stock: Hudbay Minerals - Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) is a Canadian mining company focused on producing copper, gold, silver, zinc, and molybdenum, with key assets in Canada, Peru, and the U.S. [6][10] - The company has a growth pipeline that includes projects like Copper World in Arizona, with copper accounting for approximately 57% of its projected 2024 revenue [10] - Hudbay reported a significant beat-and-raise in its first quarter, earning a Zacks Rank 2 (Buy), with projected adjusted earnings growth of 42% in 2025 and a 9% increase in revenue [11] Earnings Estimates - Current earnings estimates for Hudbay are as follows: - Current Quarter (6/2025): $0.17 - Next Quarter (9/2025): $0.15 - Current Year (12/2025): $0.68 - Next Year (12/2026): $0.67 [12] - The most accurate estimates show a potential increase to $0.84 for the current year and $1.16 for the next year, indicating strong growth potential [14] Stock Performance - Hudbay's stock has increased by 260% over the past five years, significantly outperforming the Zacks Basic Materials sector, which rose by 40% [14] - The stock experienced a 33% increase in 2025, reaching new 10-year highs on July 1, while trading in line with its 10-year median at a forward P/E of 15.7X [14]

iREIT+HOYA Capital is the premier income-focused investing service on Seeking Alpha. Our focus is on income-producing asset classes that offer the opportunity for sustainable portfolio income , diversification , and inflation hedging . Get started with a Free Two-Week Trial and take a look at our top ideas across our exclusive income-focused portfolios.With the S&P 500 ( SPY ) hitting an all-time high in recent days, it may seem that value would be hard to come by. However, I’m constantly reminded that it’s ...

Core Viewpoint - Investors in the Mining - Gold sector should consider Kinross Gold (KGC) and Royal Gold (RGLD) for potential value opportunities, with KGC currently presenting a more favorable investment case [1]. Group 1: Zacks Rank and Earnings Outlook - Kinross Gold has a Zacks Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating a positive earnings estimate revision trend, while Royal Gold has a Zacks Rank of 3 (Hold) [3]. - The improving earnings outlook for KGC suggests it may be a more attractive option for value investors compared to RGLD [3]. Group 2: Valuation Metrics - KGC has a forward P/E ratio of 13.37, significantly lower than RGLD's forward P/E of 24.17, indicating KGC may be undervalued [5]. - The PEG ratio for KGC is 0.63, while RGLD's PEG ratio is 1.27, further suggesting KGC's better valuation relative to its expected earnings growth [5]. - KGC's P/B ratio is 2.57 compared to RGLD's 3.62, reinforcing KGC's position as a more attractive investment based on traditional valuation metrics [6]. Group 3: Value Grades - KGC has earned a Value grade of A, while RGLD has a Value grade of D, highlighting KGC's superior valuation profile [6]. - The combination of Zacks Rank and Style Scores indicates that KGC stands out as the better option for value investors at this time [6].

Welcome back uh to Squawkbox. Let's check the futures right now. Not a lot happening.A little bit of red across the board. Join us now with more on the markets. Bill Nyigan, Oakmark Funds uh portfolio manager.Sorry, I'm a creature of habit. I cannot intro you without mentioning that you were talking to Mark Haynes uh when the first plane hit and and um that's right. I was in the studio in Chicago uh talking about cable TV stocks or something like that and I said how long did you did they say just we we'll b ...