Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Jiangsu Province aims to leverage digital trade to promote high-quality development of service trade, with a target of reaching a service trade scale of 600 billion yuan and digital delivery service trade of 300 billion yuan by 2030, accounting for approximately 50% of the service trade [1] - Jiangsu will focus on institutional openness in digital trade, creating a digital trade ecosystem, and aligning with high-standard economic and trade rules, including pilot cooperation in digital trade with Singapore [1] - The province plans to establish national service trade innovation development demonstration zones and national digital trade demonstration zones, enhancing infrastructure and public services in key areas like Nanjing Software Valley to facilitate domestic and international industrial chain collaboration [1] Group 2 - A significant highlight of the policy is industry empowerment, with Jiangsu focusing on developing digital product trade in the cultural industry, strengthening cultural trade bases in cities like Nanjing, Wuxi, and Suzhou, and promoting exports in sectors such as animation and film [2] - The province aims to expand digital technology trade in advantageous fields, advance high-end software development, and implement an "Artificial Intelligence+" action plan to upgrade service outsourcing and promote enterprise transformation [2] - Jiangsu will enhance international transportation service capabilities, optimize international route networks, and accelerate the development of smart ports and waterways, while also improving the international competitiveness of tourism services and supporting international education services [2]

Core Viewpoint - The decline of the U.S. manufacturing sector is attributed to both international competition and structural changes within the U.S. economy, necessitating an examination of the impact of Trump's tariff policies on different sub-industries [3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Manufacturing Sector Overview - The value added by U.S. manufacturing as a percentage of GDP has decreased from 13% in 2005 to an estimated 10% in 2024, with a projected value of approximately $2.9 trillion [4]. - In comparison, the global manufacturing value added as a percentage of GDP was 17.5% in 2022, with the U.S. accounting for 15% of global manufacturing value added, while China led with 30% [4]. Group 2: Employment and Structural Changes - The scale of U.S. manufacturing may be underestimated due to changes in industrial division of labor, where many manufacturing employees are engaged in finance, marketing, and management rather than direct production [5]. - A broader definition of manufacturing employment suggests that the total employment in U.S. manufacturing is around 15 million, which is about 2 million more than the non-farm employment statistics reported by the Labor Department [5].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the importance of service outsourcing for optimizing resource allocation and improving operational efficiency in various organizations, while also highlighting the potential risks of information leakage, especially for sensitive agencies [1] - Organizations must remain vigilant and implement effective measures to prevent the risks associated with service outsourcing [1]