综合相关技术调查结论，认定本起事故直接原因为4名保洁人员未按规定路线行走，擅自进入正线区 域；列控员郑某未按规定路径执行带道任务，在未向调度申请授权走行正线情况下擅自进入正线轨行区 行车区域，对保洁人员行走路径错误进入未授权区域的行为，未采取有效的制止措施，未按规定及时汇 报行车调度员，仍跟随4名保洁人员行走在错误路径上，直至返场检修列车与保洁员发生碰撞。 列控员郑某对事故负有直接责任。鉴于其涉嫌构成犯罪，调查报告建议移交司法机关依法追责。 对于在事故调查过程中发现的相关公职人员在履职方面存在的问题，移交浙江省纪委监委依规依纪依法 组织开展审查调查，对有关人员的党政纪处分，由省纪委监委依规依纪依法作出处理。 来源：新华网 新华社杭州12月25日电（记者魏一骏、黄筱）记者从浙江省交通运输厅获悉，12月25日，绍兴"9·13"轨 道交通2号线列车撞击事故调查报告发布。调查认定，绍兴市"9·13"轨道交通较大事故是一起因涉事企 业安全风险辨识管控不到位、从业人员违反安全操作规程等导致3人死亡、1人重伤的生产安全责任事 故。 2025年9月13日23时25分许，绍兴市轨道交通2号线一返场维修的空载列车，在檀渎站开往豆 ...

报告显示，2025年8月2 1日20时01分，福建省三明市广丰矿业有限公司水井坑煤矿（以下简称水井坑煤矿）发生一起较大瓦斯爆炸事 故，造成7人遇难、1人轻微伤，直接经济损失约926万元。 国家矿山安全监察局福建局发布《福建三明广丰矿业有限公司水井坑煤矿" 8·21"较大瓦斯爆炸事故调查报告》。 12月12日，国家矿山安全监察局福建局发布《福建三明广丰矿业有限公司水井坑煤矿" 8·21"较大瓦斯爆炸事故调查报告》。 事故调查组对 31名责任人员和相关责任单位提出处理意见建议 。其中： 水井坑煤矿矿长目前已由公安机关刑事立案侦查，待司法机关作出处理后，按干部管理权限给予相应党纪政务处分，五年内不得担任任 何生产经营单位主要负责人；水井坑煤矿总工程师、生产副矿长、安全副矿长、采掘队长、当班检身工等5名责任人员涉嫌犯罪，建议 移送司法机关追究刑事责任；对水井坑煤矿机电副矿长等12人分别给予党纪政务处分、解除劳动合同等处理；对水井坑煤矿矿长等15 名人员撤销或暂扣执业资格、特种作业操作证，对9名安全管理人员予以行政罚款，对3名人员扣罚1至3倍年终绩效；对永安煤业有限 公司主要负责人等7人分别给予党纪政务处分、免职等处理 ...

事故调查组对31名责任人员和相关责任单位提出处理意见建议。其中：水井坑煤矿矿长目前已由公安机 关刑事立案侦查，待司法机关作出处理后，按干部管理权限给予相应党纪政务处分，五年内不得担任任 何生产经营单位主要负责人；水井坑煤矿总工程师、生产副矿长、安全副矿长、采掘队长、当班检身工 等5名责任人员涉嫌犯罪，建议移送司法机关追究刑事责任；对水井坑煤矿机电副矿长等12人分别给予 党纪政务处分、解除劳动合同等处理；对水井坑煤矿矿长等15名人员撤销或暂扣执业资格、特种作业操 作证，对9名安全管理人员予以行政罚款，对3名人员扣罚1至3倍年终绩效奖金；对永安煤业有限公司主 要负责人等7人分别给予党纪政务处分、免职等处理；对福建省能化集团安监部门负责人给予诫勉处 理；对大田县政府分管领导，大田县工业和信息化局主要负责人、煤炭管理局主要负责人，三明煤炭管 理局安监科、行业管理科负责人等5人分别给予诫勉、政务处分处理。对水井坑煤矿罚款192.5万元、暂 扣安全生产许可证；责成福建省能化集团、大田县人民政府、三明市工业和信息化局(煤炭管理局)作出 深刻检查。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 12日，国家矿山安全监察局福建局发布《福建三明广丰矿 ...

Core Points - The investigation report released by the Shandong Provincial Emergency Management Department details a significant collapse accident at the grain storage project of the China Grain Reserves Corporation in Jining, resulting in 7 fatalities and 1 serious injury, with direct economic losses amounting to 13.465 million yuan [1][5] Group 1: Accident Details - The accident occurred on December 3, 2024, during the dismantling of a parabolic truss platform, where a steel wire rope broke, leading to a rapid failure of other ropes and the subsequent collapse of the structure [3][5] - At the time of the incident, 8 workers were engaged in the dismantling operation, and all fell with the collapsing structure [3] Group 2: Causes of the Accident - The report identifies multiple factors contributing to the accident, including incorrect specifications and damage to the steel wire ropes, improper binding methods, and violations in the management of construction safety [5] - It highlights that the subcontractor, general contractor, and supervisory units exhibited chaotic safety management, and local government departments failed to fulfill their responsibilities [5] Group 3: Responsibility and Consequences - The report recommends legal accountability for responsible personnel, with 12 individuals already subjected to judicial measures, including the legal representative of the subcontractor [6][7] - Additionally, 27 individuals are suggested for disciplinary actions, including senior management from various involved companies and local government officials [7] - Fines ranging from 1.5 million to 2 million yuan have been imposed on the involved companies by the local emergency management bureau [7]

2025.11. 09 本文字数：8140，阅读时长大约10分钟 据央视新闻，2024年12月3日13时53分许，济宁市金乡县中储粮济宁直属库有限公司金乡分公司粮食 仓储项目伞形桁架平台发生一起较大坍塌事故， 造成7人死亡、1人重伤，直接经济损失1346.5万元。 近日，《济宁金乡中储粮济宁直属库粮食仓储项目"12·3"较大伞形桁架坍塌事故调查报告》（以下简 称《调查报告》）公布，经调查认定，该事故是一起 因伞形桁架拆除作业过程中钢丝绳规格选用错 误、存在损伤缺陷、绑扎方式不合理，电动葫芦吊点设置不当、违规单点提升，伞形桁架上违规堆载材 料等因素，施工分包、总承包、监理、建设单位安全管理混乱，属地党委、政府和有关部门履职不到位 ，造成的较大生产安全责任事故。 经过综合分析，钢丝绳规格选用错误、钢丝绳存在损伤缺陷、吊点设置不当、钢丝绳绑扎方式不合理、 伞形桁架上方材料堆载、违规进行单点提升等，综合导致局部受力不均，超过钢丝绳承载极限，钢丝绳 陆续断裂，伞形桁架和人员坠落是造成事故发生的直接原因。 1. 王涛，群众，华晟公司法定代表人。因涉嫌重大责任事故罪，2024年12月7日被金乡县公安局刑 事拘留，2025年 ...

来源：央视新闻客户端 2 0 2 4年12月3日1 3时5 3分许，济宁市金乡县中储粮济宁直属库有限公司金乡分公司粮食仓 储项目伞形桁架平台发生一起较大坍塌事故，造成7人死亡、1人重伤，直接经济损失 1 3 4 6.5万元。 近日，《济宁金乡中储粮济宁直属库粮食仓储项目" 12·3"较大伞形桁架坍塌事故调查报 告》（以下简称《调查报告》）公布，经调查认定，该事故是一起因伞形桁架拆除作业过程 中钢丝绳规格选用错误、存在损伤缺陷、绑扎方式不合理，电动葫芦吊点设置不当、违规单 点提升，伞形桁架上违规堆载材料等因素，施工分包、总承包、监理、建设单位安全管理混 乱，属地党委、政府和有关部门履职不到位，造成的较大生产安全责任事故。 经过综合分析，钢丝绳规格选用错误、钢丝绳存在损伤缺陷、吊点设置不当、钢丝绳绑扎方 式不合理、伞形桁架上方材料堆载、违规进行单点提升等，综合导致局部受力不均，超过钢 丝绳承载极限，钢丝绳陆续断裂，伞形桁架和人员坠落是造成事故发生的直接原因。 《调查报告》还对事故责任人员和责任单位给出如下处理建议： （一）已被司法机关采取强制措施人员（12人） 厉泳，群众，中建七局二公司仓储项目部安全总监。因涉嫌 ...

Core Viewpoint - The investigation report on the collapse of the grain storage project by China Grain Reserves Corporation (Sinograin) reveals that the accident was caused by multiple factors including improper selection of wire rope specifications, damage defects, unreasonable binding methods, and chaotic safety management among contractors and supervisors, leading to significant safety responsibility issues [1][2][3]. Summary by Sections Accident Details - The accident occurred on December 3, 2024, resulting in 7 fatalities and 1 serious injury, with direct economic losses amounting to 1.3465 million yuan [1]. - The investigation identified that the collapse was due to uneven local stress exceeding the wire rope's load limit, leading to its failure and subsequent collapse of the platform [2]. Responsibility and Legal Actions - A total of 12 individuals have been subjected to compulsory measures by judicial authorities, including key personnel from the construction and supervision teams, with recommendations for criminal liability [2][3][4]. - Specific individuals, such as the legal representative of Huasheng Company and project managers from China Construction Seventh Engineering Division, have been detained for their roles in the accident [3][4]. Recommendations for Disciplinary Actions - The report suggests disciplinary actions for 27 individuals, including party disciplinary sanctions and administrative penalties for those in leadership positions at China Construction Seventh Engineering Division and Sinograin [5][6][7]. - Recommendations include demotions, warnings, and financial penalties based on internal management regulations for those found responsible for safety management failures [5][6][7]. Administrative Penalties - The report recommends administrative fines ranging from 1.5 million to 2 million yuan for several companies involved, including Huasheng Company, China Construction Seventh Engineering Division, and Sinograin [16]. - Specific individuals within these companies are also recommended for fines based on their annual income percentages due to their failure to fulfill safety management responsibilities [17][18][19].

央视新闻客户端消息，2024年12月3日13时53分许，济宁市金乡县中储粮济宁直属库有限公司金乡分公 司粮食仓储项目伞形桁架平台发生一起较大坍塌事故，造成7人死亡、1人重伤，直接经济损失1346.5万 元。 近日，《济宁金乡中储粮济宁直属库粮食仓储项目"12·3"较大伞形桁架坍塌事故调查报告》（以下简称 《调查报告》）公布，经调查认定，该事故是一起因伞形桁架拆除作业过程中钢丝绳规格选用错误、存 在损伤缺陷、绑扎方式不合理，电动葫芦吊点设置不当、违规单点提升，伞形桁架上违规堆载材料等因 素，施工分包、总承包、监理、建设单位安全管理混乱，属地党委、政府和有关部门履职不到位，造成 的较大生产安全责任事故。 经过综合分析，钢丝绳规格选用错误、钢丝绳存在损伤缺陷、吊点设置不当、钢丝绳绑扎方式不合理、 伞形桁架上方材料堆载、违规进行单点提升等，综合导致局部受力不均，超过钢丝绳承载极限，钢丝绳 陆续断裂，伞形桁架和人员坠落是造成事故发生的直接原因。 《调查报告》还对事故责任人员和责任单位给出如下处理建议： （一）已被司法机关采取强制措施人员（12人） 王涛，群众，华晟公司法定代表人。因涉嫌重大责任事故罪，2024年12月7 ...

Core Viewpoint - The investigation into the fire accident at the cold storage facility in Weihai, Shandong, revealed significant safety management failures, leading to the deaths of 9 individuals and injuries to 3 others, with direct economic losses amounting to 27.84 million yuan [1][2]. Group 1: Accident Details - The fire occurred on December 7, 2024, during welding operations, where high-temperature sparks ignited flammable materials, resulting in rapid fire spread and significant casualties [1][2]. - A total of 31 workers from four different companies were present at the site during the incident, with 8 fatalities occurring on-site and 1 person dying later in the hospital [1]. Group 2: Causes of the Accident - The accident was attributed to multiple factors, including the use of non-compliant polyurethane insulation materials, chaotic safety management on-site, and unlicensed welding operations by workers [2]. - The initial fire response was inadequate, leading to a rapid escalation of the situation and blocking evacuation routes with toxic smoke [2]. Group 3: Criminal Accountability - A total of 13 individuals have been recommended for criminal prosecution due to their roles in the accident, including company executives and safety personnel [3][4][5]. - Key figures include the legal representatives and project managers of the involved companies, who face charges related to major responsibility for the accident [3][4][5]. Group 4: Administrative and Disciplinary Actions - Recommendations for disciplinary actions include severe warnings and demotions for various officials from local government and construction management agencies, highlighting systemic failures in oversight [6][7][8]. - Administrative penalties are suggested for several companies involved in the project, indicating a broader accountability for safety violations [10][11].

岳旭辉、胡晓冬/央视新闻 法院认为，被告人韩文明等10人作为永聚煤业及其上级单位直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员， 履职不力，安全生产设施、安全生产条件不符合国家规定，致使发生重大安全事故，其行为均已构成重 大劳动安全事故罪；被告人陈瑞强等3人作为涉案联建楼浴室吊篮施工单位的直接责任人员，违反国家 规定，降低工程质量标准，造成重大安全事故，其行为均已构成工程重大安全事故罪。根据各被告人犯 罪的事实、性质、情节、造成的危害后果等，依法对韩文明等10人分别判处四年六个月至一年三个月不 等有期徒刑；对陈瑞强等3人分别判处三年三个月至二年三个月不等有期徒刑，并处罚金。对其中4名符 合缓刑条件的被告人依法适用缓刑。 案件审判过程中，法庭依法保障了被告人的各项诉讼权利。宣判后，被告人韩文明等10人当庭表示认罪 服判、不上诉。人大代表、政协委员和部分被告人亲属旁听了案件宣判。 本 期 编 辑 邹姗 记者从山西省吕梁市离石区人民法院获悉，2025年9月29日，山西省吕梁市离石区人民法院依法对吕梁 永聚煤业有限公司联建楼"11·16"重大火灾事故涉及的韩文明等10人重大劳动安全事故案和陈瑞强等3人 工程重大安全事故案公开一 ...