9月4日，福建省应急管理厅发布《福建三明三钢闽光（002110）股份公司"12·9"较大坍塌事故调查报 告》。 调查报告指出，该起事故直接原因是：违章指挥，违章作业，未按标准作业流程和既定施工方案自上而 下进入料仓内清理悬挂料，擅自从料仓下部人孔进入料仓内作业，导致本起事故发生。 事故调查组对26名有关责任人员和责任单位提出了处理建议。 公开资料显示，三钢闽光是福建三钢（集团）有限责任公司（简称"三钢集团"）控股的子公司，成立于 2001年12月26日，2007年1月26日在深交所挂牌。公司主营业务是以钢铁为主业，辅以配套、延伸等附 属产业。现有公司本部、泉州闽光、罗源闽光等主要生产基地，具备年产钢能力1200万吨。主要钢铁产 品有"闽光"牌建筑用材、金属制品材、中厚板材、机械制造用圆钢、H型钢五大系列。 同时，公司的负债率为63.05%，处于较高水平。而公司的毛利率仅为6.96%，处于较低水平。 2025半年度报告显示，三钢闽光呈现"增利不增收" 的局面：上半年实现营业收入220.60亿元，同比下滑 4.32%；归母净利润1.38亿元，同比增长158.79%；扣非归母净利润1.15亿元，同比增长142.39 ...

Core Points - The investigation report on the "4·23" fire accident at the Chaobai River Bridge in Beijing was released, holding two units and 16 individuals accountable [1] - The fire occurred on April 23, 2025, leading to the collapse of the main bridge span, with direct economic losses amounting to 16.298 million yuan [1] - The accident was attributed to improper management of road lighting facility construction and maintenance, as well as inadequate oversight by relevant government departments [2] Investigation Findings - The direct cause of the accident was identified as corrosion and perforation of the steel pipe protecting the road lighting cable, leading to electrical short circuits and subsequent ignition of combustible materials [2] - The fire spread through the high-density polyethylene (HDPE) sheath, causing multiple steel wires and strands to fail under high temperatures, resulting in the collapse of the bridge span [2] - The investigation revealed significant issues in construction management, daily maintenance of lighting facilities, and emergency response preparedness [2] Accountability Measures - The investigation team referred issues related to public officials' responsibilities to the Beijing Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Supervisory Commission for further accountability [2] - Following the investigation, disciplinary actions were taken against two units and 16 responsible individuals [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant safety incident at Weifang Jinshi Biotechnology Co., Ltd. in Shouguang, Shandong Province, resulting in 7 deaths and 4 injuries due to inadequate risk management and regulatory failures [1][2]. Summary by Sections Incident Overview - On October 12, 2024, a poisoning accident occurred at Weifang Jinshi Biotechnology Co., Ltd., leading to 7 fatalities and 4 injuries [1]. - The investigation revealed that the accident was caused by the company's failure to implement risk control measures for confined space operations, along with violations of safety protocols and ineffective local government oversight [1]. Direct Causes of the Accident - The direct causes included the accumulation of hydrogen sulfide gas due to the fermentation of corn slurry in anaerobic conditions, and the unauthorized entry of workers into the slurry pool without proper safety measures [2]. Responsibility and Legal Actions - Two individuals who died in the incident were exempt from criminal liability due to their deaths, while five others, including the actual controller of the company, have been detained for their roles in the accident [3][4][5]. - Recommendations for disciplinary actions against 21 local government officials were made, highlighting failures in oversight and enforcement of safety regulations [6][7]. Administrative Penalties - It is suggested that Weifang Jinshi Biotechnology Co., Ltd. be fined between 1.5 million and 2 million yuan for safety violations [15]. Recommendations for Accountability - Local government bodies and relevant departments are urged to conduct thorough written self-examinations and report to higher authorities regarding their oversight failures [16].

Core Points - The incident occurred on February 28, 2025, at a pig farm in Shuanghe Town, Heshan City, Guangdong, resulting in 2 deaths and 1 injury, with direct economic losses estimated at approximately 2.006 million yuan [1][5] - The investigation report identified the incident as a production safety responsibility accident caused by illegal operations and blind rescue attempts, which exacerbated the casualties [1][8] Incident Details - The workers from Jiangmen Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. were performing limited space operations related to the installation of a sewage pump in a biogas tank when the accident occurred [5] - One worker lost consciousness due to inhaling toxic gases and fell into the tank, prompting another worker to attempt a rescue without proper safety measures, leading to further casualties [7] Direct Causes - The direct causes of the accident included: 1. Violation of safety regulations for limited space operations, including lack of preparation in terms of material reserves, personnel training, and safety measures [8] 2. Blind rescue attempts without ensuring safety or using necessary protective equipment, which led to increased casualties [8]

Core Points - The incident on December 22, 2024, involved a crane accident during the construction of the Shanghai Hujia Expressway-Jiamin Elevated Connection Line, resulting in damage to a train on Line 11 of the Shanghai Metro [1][3] - The direct economic loss from the accident is approximately 18.31 million yuan [1] - The accident was classified as a major safety responsibility incident due to violations of construction plans and operational procedures [3] Incident Details - The accident occurred at around 7:30 AM when the Shanghai Greenland Steel Structure Co., Ltd. was conducting a box beam hoisting operation [4] - At 7:55 AM, a 260-ton crawler crane tipped over towards the metro line, leading to a collision with a train traveling at 91.2 km/h [4][5] - The train's emergency braking system was activated, and it came to a stop 19 seconds after the collision [5] Causes of the Accident - The accident was primarily caused by discrepancies in crane selection and positioning, leading to a lack of coordination during the dual crane operation [6] - The 260-ton crane was overloaded and exceeded the allowable horizontal level, resulting in excessive lateral forces that caused the crane's arm to collapse [6] - Specific issues included the use of an incorrect crane model, lack of synchronization between the two cranes, and failure to adhere to safety protocols [6] Identified Problems - The subcontractor failed to implement a comprehensive safety responsibility system, and the project manager was often absent [7] - There were violations of operational procedures, including improper crane positioning and lack of supervision during the hoisting operation [7] - The main contractor did not ensure proper safety management and failed to notify the metro company about the construction activities [8] Recommendations for Accountability - Criminal liability is suggested for several individuals involved, including the crane operator and project technical leader [9] - Administrative penalties are recommended for the subcontractor, crane rental company, and main contractor, as well as their respective leaders [10]