Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting to condemn the recent U.S. military actions against Venezuela, with multiple countries emphasizing the need to adhere to international law, particularly the United Nations Charter [2][3]. Group 1: International Reactions - Various countries, including Russia, Colombia, Brazil, Chile, and Cuba, condemned the U.S. military actions, asserting that it violated Venezuela's sovereignty and political independence [2][3]. - The UN Secretary-General António Guterres expressed concern over the U.S. actions, stating they did not respect international law and emphasized the importance of all member states adhering to the UN Charter [2]. - The Colombian representative at the UN highlighted that the U.S. military strike constituted an illegitimate use of force against another nation [3]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife appeared in a U.S. court, where they denied the charges against them, with Maduro claiming he was kidnapped [4][5]. - The court session lasted approximately 30 minutes, and Maduro was ordered to appear again for a hearing on March 17 [6]. Group 3: Political Developments - Following the U.S. military action, the Venezuelan Supreme Court appointed Vice President Rodríguez as the acting president [7]. - U.S. President Trump stated that Venezuela would not hold new elections in the next 30 days and mentioned the potential for U.S. funding to rebuild Venezuela's energy infrastructure [7][8]. - Trump characterized the U.S. actions as a fight against "drug traffickers" rather than a war with Venezuela, indicating a possible second military action if cooperation from the acting president ceases [8].

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the principles of the UN Charter to maintain international peace and security [2] Group 1 - The UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, stated that the UN Charter prohibits the use or threat of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state [2] - The commitment of all member states to uphold all provisions of the UN Charter is crucial for maintaining international peace and security [2]

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Human Rights Office spokesperson criticized the United States for its interference in Venezuela, stating it violates Venezuela's sovereignty and international law, thereby undermining global security [1] Group 1: U.S. Actions in Venezuela - The U.S. military actions in Venezuela have raised significant concerns from the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, highlighting the violation of a fundamental principle of international law regarding the use of force against a nation's territorial integrity [1] - The spokesperson emphasized that the U.S. actions send a dangerous signal that power can act without restraint, which weakens mechanisms designed to prevent further conflicts and potential global wars, such as the United Nations [1] Group 2: Call for International Response - There is a call for the international community to remain vigilant regarding the situation, with a unified stance to defend the UN Charter and international law [1] - The spokesperson urged all nations to collectively oppose actions that violate international law, reinforcing the need for global cooperation to maintain peace and security [1]

Core Viewpoint - Multiple countries, including China, Venezuela, and Russia, condemned the unilateral and illegal actions of the United States against Venezuela during a UN Security Council emergency meeting, emphasizing the need for adherence to international law and the UN Charter [1][3][4]. Group 1: Statements from UN Representatives - UN Secretary-General Guterres expressed concern over the U.S. military actions against Venezuela, stating they did not respect international law and could set a dangerous precedent for international relations [3][4]. - China's representative at the UN strongly condemned the U.S. actions, urging the U.S. to respect international law and stop undermining Venezuela's sovereignty [4][5]. - Venezuela's UN representative highlighted that U.S. actions violate the UN Charter and create a dangerous precedent, threatening not only Venezuela's sovereignty but also the credibility of international law [7][8]. Group 2: International Reactions - Russia's UN representative called for a comprehensive evaluation of the U.S. actions under international law, criticizing the hypocrisy of countries that demand adherence to the UN Charter while ignoring U.S. aggression [9]. - The UK reaffirmed its commitment to international law and the principles of the UN Charter as essential for maintaining global peace and security [10]. - France criticized the U.S. military actions as violations of the principles of peaceful dispute resolution and non-use of force [11]. Group 3: Regional Perspectives - Colombia's UN representative warned that U.S. military actions threaten the post-World War II international order and could destabilize both regional and global peace [12]. - South Africa's representative condemned the U.S. actions as a blatant violation of Venezuela's sovereignty, warning that such behavior could lead to disorder in international relations [13].

当天，联合国安理会也就委内瑞拉局势召开紧急会议，多国代表对美方行径表示强烈谴责。 马杜罗拒绝美方所有指控 当地时间1月5日，遭美国强行控制的委内瑞拉总统马杜罗及其妻子，在纽约南区联邦地区法院首次出庭接受庭审。庭审过程中，马杜罗拒绝了美方所有 指控，并表示"我无罪"。 法院外，抗议者聚集，要求释放马杜罗，抗议美国军事干涉委内瑞拉。 △美国纽约南区联邦地区法院 马杜罗被美方指控犯有"毒品恐怖主义阴谋罪、可卡因走私阴谋罪、持有机枪及破坏性装置罪，以及针对美国的持有机枪及破坏性装置阴谋罪"。 马杜罗在法庭上表示，自己是"被绑架的""我无罪"，拒绝美方对其一切指控。马杜罗强调，他仍然是委内瑞拉总统。 马杜罗的代理律师"对马杜罗被强行控制的合法性存在疑问"，并表示将提交大量文件来应对法律挑战。 马杜罗的妻子西利娅·弗洛雷斯对美方指控同样表示无罪。她的代理律师告诉法庭，弗洛雷斯在美军突袭时受了伤，需要接受治疗。 △载有马杜罗的车队离开法院 3月17日将再次出庭 0:00 / 0:50 △马杜罗从拘留中心被转移至法院 美东时间5日8时许，马杜罗及其夫人被全副武装的警卫从纽约布鲁克林一处拘留中心带出，随后经直升机等转运，抵达纽 ...

当地时间1月5日，遭美国强行控制的委内瑞拉总统马杜罗及其妻子，在纽约南区联邦地区法院首次出庭接受庭审。庭审过 程中，马杜罗拒绝了美方所有指控，并表示"我无罪"。 法院外，抗议者聚集，要求释放马杜罗，抗议美国军事干涉委内瑞拉。 当天，联合国安理会也就委内瑞拉局势召开紧急会议，多国代表对美方行径表示强烈谴责。 马杜罗拒绝美方所有指控 3月17日将再次出庭 美东时间5日8时许，马杜罗及其夫人被全副武装的警卫从纽约布鲁克林一处拘留中心带出，随后经直升机等转运，抵达纽 约南区联邦地区法院。 美东时间当天12时许（北京时间6日凌晨1时），马杜罗在纽约南区联邦地区法院首次出庭接受庭审。法院公告显示，庭审 由法官阿尔文·赫勒斯坦主持。 马杜罗被美方指控犯有"毒品恐怖主义阴谋罪、可卡因走私阴谋罪、持有机枪及破坏性装置罪，以及针对美国的持有机枪及 破坏性装置阴谋罪"。 马杜罗在法庭上表示，自己是"被绑架的""我无罪"，拒绝美方对其一切指控。马杜罗强调，他仍然是委内瑞拉总统。 马杜罗的代理律师"对马杜罗被强行控制的合法性存在疑问"，并表示将提交大量文件来应对法律挑战。 马杜罗的妻子西利娅·弗洛雷斯对美方指控同样表示无罪。她的代理律 ...

Group 1 - Venezuelan President Maduro appeared in a U.S. court for the first time, facing charges including "drug trafficking conspiracy" and "terrorism conspiracy" [2] - The U.S. Attorney General announced the charges against Maduro, which include possession of firearms and conspiracy related to weapons [2] - Protests occurred outside the courthouse, with demonstrators calling for Maduro's release and opposing U.S. intervention in Venezuela [2] Group 2 - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, with Secretary-General Guterres expressing concern over U.S. military actions [3] - Guterres emphasized that the use of force against any country's territorial integrity is prohibited under the UN Charter [3] - A committee was established by Venezuela's acting president to handle matters related to Maduro's release, led by Jorge Rodriguez [4]

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, where multiple countries condemned the military actions taken by the United States against Venezuela [1] Group 1: Brazil's Position - Brazil's representative emphasized the negative consequences of external military interventions, which often lead to authoritarian regimes and human rights violations [2] - Brazil reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining peace in the region and opposed the establishment of a "trust territory" in Venezuela, advocating for solutions that respect the self-determination of the Venezuelan people [2][3] - Brazil called for a strong condemnation of armed interventions against a nation's sovereignty and urged the Security Council to respond in accordance with international law [3] Group 2: Mexico's Position - Mexico's representative condemned the military aggression against Venezuela, stating it violates the United Nations Charter and undermines multilateralism [4] - Mexico emphasized the importance of territorial integrity and political independence, advocating for peaceful and democratic resolutions to political differences [4] - Mexico called for the international community to respect international law and support dialogue to resolve disputes, reinforcing the region's tradition as a "zone of peace" [4] Group 3: Nicaragua's Position - Nicaragua's representative highlighted the region's status as a "zone of peace," urging international respect for this principle [5] - Nicaragua supported Venezuela's constitutional order and the right of its people to defend their sovereignty against external interference [5][6] - Nicaragua called for collective efforts to prevent further deterioration of international peace and security [6] Group 4: South Africa's Position - South Africa's representative stated that the U.S. military actions against Venezuela severely violate its sovereignty and independence, contravening international law [7] - South Africa emphasized that internal governance issues should be resolved through multilateral mechanisms rather than military force [7] - The statement from South Africa highlighted the need for respect for international law to maintain global stability and order [7]

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed deep concern over the U.S. military action against Venezuela on January 3, stating it did not respect international law [1] Group 1: International Law and Military Action - Guterres emphasized that the use or threat of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state is prohibited by the United Nations Charter [1] - The maintenance of international peace and security relies on all member states' commitment to adhere to all provisions of the United Nations Charter [1] Group 2: United Nations Response - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting on the situation in Venezuela on the same day [1] - The remarks were delivered by the UN Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Rosemary DiCarlo, on behalf of Guterres [1]

迪卡洛表示，委内瑞拉政府已将美方行动定性为军事侵略，严重违反《联合国宪章》，对地区和国际和 平与安全构成威胁。迪卡洛对委内瑞拉未来局势及其外溢影响表示严重关切。迪卡洛强调，各方必须遵 守国际法和《联合国宪章》，禁止以武力侵犯他国主权和领土完整，呼吁委内瑞拉各方开展包容性对 话，通过和平方式解决危机，并敦促地区国家和国际社会秉持团结精神，避免局势进一步升级。 智通财经2026-01-05 23:16:01 央视新闻 当地时间1月5日，联合国安理会就委内瑞拉局势举行紧急会议。联合国副秘书长迪卡洛代表秘书长就委 内瑞拉局势向安理会通报称，1月3日美国对委内瑞拉采取的军事行动令局势进入"十分严峻的时刻"。 本 期 编 辑 邢潭 ...