马杜罗向美法院提交动议 要求驳回其面临的刑事指控 中新网2月27日电 据路透社报道，当地时间2月26日，委内瑞拉总统马杜罗向美国法院提交动议，要求 驳回其面临的"毒品走私"指控，并指责美国政府阻止委内瑞拉政府支付其辩护费用，从而干涉辩护。 图片来源：当地时间1月5日，委内瑞拉总统马杜罗抵达美国纽约联邦法庭，将在这里首次出庭受审。图 为马杜罗在前往法院途中。 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 报道称，美方检察官办公室发言人尚未对此作出回应。 美国1月3日凌晨对委内瑞拉发动大规模军事打击，强行控制马杜罗夫妇并将他们带到美国。随后，美国 司法部长邦迪宣布了针对马杜罗夫妇的起诉书，该起诉书由联邦检察官办公室提交，指控马杜罗及其夫 人、儿子，以及3名委内瑞拉高级官员犯有"毒品恐怖主义阴谋罪、可卡因走私阴谋罪、持有机枪及破坏 性装置罪，以及针对美国的持有机枪及破坏性装置阴谋罪"。 1月5日，马杜罗夫妇在美国纽约南区联邦地区法院首次出庭，拒绝美方一切指控，强调自己"无罪"。 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：王永乐 据报道，在当天提交的动议中，马杜罗的律师辩称，美方的相关举措侵犯了马杜罗根据美国宪法第六修 正案享有的获得律师协助的权利，因 ...

2026年年初，委内瑞拉总统马杜罗被美军强行控制后，美国纽约南区联邦法院指控其涉嫌"毒品恐怖主义阴谋罪、可卡因走私阴谋罪、持有机枪 及破坏性装置罪，以及针对美国的持有机枪及破坏性装置阴谋罪"。 此前庭审中，马杜罗及其妻子均对美方所有指控表示否认。若罪名成立，马杜罗和妻子均可能被判处终身监禁。 据报道，巴里•波拉克上周通过电子邮件向曼哈顿联邦法官通报，美国财政部已拒绝批准委内瑞拉政府按照其国内法律和惯例，向马杜罗及其妻子支付律师 费用的安排。该电子邮件于2月25日被正式录入公共法庭记录。 波拉克表示，美国财政部外国资产控制办公室于1月9日曾批准了委内瑞拉政府支付马杜罗法律费用的许可。但不到三个小时后，特朗普政府在"未作任何解 释"的情况下撤回了该授权，不过保留了对马杜罗妻子律师费用的许可。 有分析指出，若允许委内瑞拉现政府承担马杜罗的辩护费用，可能会使检察官在法庭上反驳其论点的工作复杂化。马杜罗辩称，美军强行控制他是非法的， 而作为外国国家元首，根据美国法律和国际法，他享有免于起诉的豁免权。 此外，波拉克表示，他已于2月11日致函外国资产控制办公室，要求恢复最初的许可，并消除委内瑞拉政府履行支付马杜罗辩护费用义 ...

Core Points - Venezuelan President Maduro denies allegations of drug terrorism and cocaine trafficking in a New York court, asserting his innocence and claiming to be a "prisoner of war" rather than a typical criminal defendant [1][5][6] - The court session lasted approximately 30 minutes, with Maduro scheduled to return for a hearing on March 17 [1][4] - Maduro's wife, Flores, appeared in court with visible injuries, and both have not applied for bail but reserve the right to request pre-trial release [4] Legal Proceedings - The U.S. charges against Maduro include conspiracy to commit drug terrorism, cocaine trafficking, and possession of firearms [1][3] - The presiding judge, Alvin Hellerstein, is known for his strict demeanor and has previously ruled against Trump in notable cases [2][6] - Maduro's defense team questions the legality of his detention and plans to submit extensive documentation to challenge the charges [4][6] Public Reaction - Outside the courthouse, protests occurred with demonstrators holding signs supporting Maduro and opposing U.S. intervention in Venezuela [7][8] - A counter-protest featured supporters of Trump, indicating a divided public opinion on the matter [7] International Context - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, with multiple countries condemning U.S. military actions as a violation of international law [8]

Group 1 - Maduro and his wife Flores pleaded not guilty to the charges brought by the U.S., which include "drug terrorism conspiracy, cocaine smuggling conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices against the U.S." [3][4] - Maduro claimed he was forcibly taken from his home in Caracas, Venezuela, and asserted his innocence, stating he remains the President of Venezuela [3]. - Maduro's attorney argued that he is a head of state and enjoys the privileges associated with that status, questioning the legality of his forcible capture [3]. Group 2 - Flores also pleaded not guilty to the U.S. charges, and her attorney informed the court that she was injured during the military operation and requires medical treatment [4]. - The judge has scheduled a hearing for Maduro to appear again on March 17 [5]. - The U.S. conducted a large-scale military operation on January 3, forcibly taking control of Maduro and his wife and bringing them to the U.S., where Maduro is currently detained in a Brooklyn detention center [5].

Core Viewpoint - Venezuelan President Maduro pleads not guilty to U.S. charges, asserting his position as the legitimate president and claiming he was forcibly taken from his home [4][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Maduro appeared in a U.S. federal court, where he faced charges including "drug trafficking conspiracy," "cocaine smuggling conspiracy," and possession of firearms [4][3]. - The court session was presided over by Judge Alvin Hellerstein [5]. Group 2: Government Response - The Venezuelan government issued a decree to search for and arrest individuals involved in inciting or supporting U.S. armed attacks, declaring a national state of emergency [7]. - The decree includes military management of critical infrastructure and enhanced security measures along borders [7]. Group 3: Political Developments - Following Maduro's detention, Vice President Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as the acting president of Venezuela [10]. - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, with concerns raised about U.S. military actions being classified as aggression [12][13]. Group 4: U.S. Military Involvement - U.S. Defense Secretary stated that fewer than 200 personnel were involved in the military operation against Venezuela [13].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal proceedings against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, who faces serious charges in a U.S. court, including drug-related offenses and possession of firearms, while he maintains his innocence and claims to be the legitimate president of Venezuela [4][6]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Maduro was transported from a federal prison in Brooklyn to a Manhattan court for his hearing on January 5, where he faced four felony charges, including drug terrorism conspiracy and cocaine smuggling conspiracy, which could lead to life imprisonment [6]. - During the court session, Maduro confirmed his identity and stated through a translator that he was arrested at home, asserting his innocence against all charges [8][9]. - His defense attorney, Barry Pollack, known for handling politically sensitive cases, indicated that the legal process would be lengthy and complex, focusing on Maduro's presidential privileges and immunities [11]. Group 2: International Reactions - The Chinese government expressed support for Venezuela, calling for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council regarding U.S. military actions against Venezuela [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal situation surrounding Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife, who were forcibly taken by the U.S. and are facing serious charges in a New York court, where they both plead not guilty [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, appeared in court where they denied all charges brought against them by the U.S., which include drug-related offenses and possession of firearms [1]. - Maduro's lawyer argues that he is a head of state and enjoys certain privileges, questioning the legality of his forced removal [1]. - The court has scheduled a follow-up hearing for Maduro on March 17 [2]. Group 2: Context of the Situation - The U.S. conducted a large-scale military operation on January 3, forcibly taking Maduro and his wife to the U.S., where Maduro is currently detained in a Brooklyn facility [2].

Group 1 - Venezuelan President Maduro appeared in a U.S. court for the first time, facing charges including "drug trafficking conspiracy" and "terrorism conspiracy" [2] - The U.S. Attorney General announced the charges against Maduro, which include possession of firearms and conspiracy related to weapons [2] - Protests occurred outside the courthouse, with demonstrators calling for Maduro's release and opposing U.S. intervention in Venezuela [2] Group 2 - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, with Secretary-General Guterres expressing concern over U.S. military actions [3] - Guterres emphasized that the use of force against any country's territorial integrity is prohibited under the UN Charter [3] - A committee was established by Venezuela's acting president to handle matters related to Maduro's release, led by Jorge Rodriguez [4]

Core Viewpoint - Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife appeared in a New York federal court after being forcibly taken by the U.S., both pleaded not guilty, and Maduro claimed he remains the leader of Venezuela [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The indictment against Maduro spans 25 pages, detailing serious charges including "drug terrorism conspiracy, cocaine trafficking conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices against the U.S." [5]. - The minimum sentence for the drug terrorism charge is 20 years, with a maximum of life imprisonment [5]. - Maduro's lawyer stated that he is not seeking bail at this time but may consider it in the future [4]. Group 2: Public Reaction - Protests occurred outside the federal court, with demonstrators calling for Maduro's release and opposing U.S. military actions against Venezuela [5][7]. - The court area was heavily policed to maintain order during the proceedings [5]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Maduro has hired Barry Joel Pollack, a prominent lawyer known for defending Julian Assange, to represent him [8]. - Pollack's previous experience includes high-profile cases, raising interest in how he will construct a defense for Maduro against the serious charges [8]. Group 4: International Response - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting to discuss the situation in Venezuela, condemning the U.S. actions as violations of international law [10]. - Russian representatives at the UN called for Maduro's immediate release, criticizing the U.S. for its double standards regarding international law [11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent detention of Venezuelan President Maduro by the U.S. and the subsequent legal proceedings he faces in a New York federal court, highlighting the geopolitical implications and international reactions to the U.S. actions against Venezuela [1][3][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Maduro was forcibly taken from a detention center in Brooklyn and transported to the federal court in New York for a hearing scheduled for January 6 [1][3]. - He faces serious charges including "drug trafficking conspiracy, cocaine smuggling conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy related to these offenses against the U.S." [5]. - The presiding judge for the case is Alvin Hellerstein, a 92-year-old federal judge with a long history of handling significant criminal and national security cases [5]. Group 2: U.S. Actions and International Reactions - The U.S. has accused Maduro of leading a drug trafficking organization known as the "Cartel of the Suns," with previous charges dating back to 2020 [6]. - International figures, including the UN Secretary-General and leaders from Brazil and Cuba, have condemned the U.S. actions as violations of international law and principles [8]. - The U.S. military actions against Venezuela have been characterized as a dangerous precedent, with critics arguing that they undermine multilateralism and respect for international norms [8]. Group 3: Oil and Economic Implications - Following the U.S. military intervention, at least 16 oil tankers attempted to break through the U.S. blockade of Venezuela, with some successfully leaving Venezuelan waters [9]. - The U.S. has emphasized the importance of oil in its rhetoric, mentioning it 26 times in relation to the situation, compared to only 14 mentions of drugs [9]. - A Chevron-chartered tanker has reportedly set sail from Venezuela towards the U.S. Gulf Coast, indicating ongoing economic ties despite the political turmoil [10].