【环球时报综合报道】"德莫赖斯在博索纳罗违反限制规定后判处其居家监禁。"巴西《圣保罗州报》4日以此为题称，巴西联邦最高法院法官亚历 山大·德莫赖斯当天决定对前总统博索纳罗实施居家监禁，并下令警方搜查其住所，没收博索纳罗持有的所有手机。此外，德莫赖斯还禁止除律师 外的任何人前往博索纳罗住所探访。 据《圣保罗州报》报道，德莫赖斯在判决书中称，博索纳罗"实施非法行为"，通过子女和政治盟友等人的社交媒体发布信息，"蓄意制作相关材 料，煽动其支持者继续试图攻击联邦最高法院、妨碍司法公正"。此前，为防止博索纳罗妨碍司法调查，德莫赖斯已于7月18日对其采取限制措 施，包括佩戴电子脚镣、禁止夜间和周末离家、不得使用社交媒体及借用他人账号发声等。但就在4日，博索纳罗之子、参议员弗拉维奥在社交媒 体发布其父博索纳罗对支持者讲话的录音及佩戴电子脚镣的照片。对此，德莫赖斯表示，司法机构不会允许一名被告因其 "政治和经济权力" 而 "把司法当傻瓜"，博索纳罗"无视、故意不遵守" 最高法院作出的裁决，表明"有必要采取更严厉的措施"。 针对巴西最高法院对博索纳罗的最新判决，美国政府表示谴责。据美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）报道，当地时间4日 ...

Core Points - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes ordered former President Jair Bolsonaro to be placed under house arrest for violating previous preventive measures by using social media accounts to incite attacks on the Supreme Court and support foreign interference in Brazil's judicial system [1][2] - Moraes emphasized the need for stricter measures against Bolsonaro to prevent further criminal actions [2] - Bolsonaro is prohibited from using social media directly or indirectly, and any attempts to circumvent this ban could lead to arrest [3] - The court found Bolsonaro guilty of coercing and obstructing justice, as well as endangering national sovereignty, leading to restrictions including electronic monitoring and house arrest during specific hours [4] - Bolsonaro and his associates have been accused of attempting to influence U.S. sanctions against Brazilian officials and interfering with the work of Brazil's constitutional court [4] - The U.S. President announced a 50% tariff on Brazil and demanded an end to the judicial investigation against Bolsonaro, which has drawn strong backlash from the Brazilian government [4] - Bolsonaro has denied charges of plotting a coup after losing the 2022 presidential election, claiming to be a victim of political persecution [5] - The Brazilian Supreme Court is processing criminal charges against Bolsonaro and others for their alleged roles in a coup attempt to prevent the inauguration of President Lula [7] - The Brazilian Electoral Court has barred Bolsonaro from running for office until 2030, disqualifying him from the 2026 presidential election [9]

Core Points - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court has ordered former President Jair Bolsonaro to be placed under house arrest due to violations involving the use of social media to incite attacks on the court and support foreign interference in Brazil's judicial system [1][2] - Bolsonaro is prohibited from using social media directly or indirectly, and must wear an electronic ankle monitor while under house arrest [2] - The court has indicated that Bolsonaro's actions necessitate stricter measures to prevent further offenses [1][2] Legal Proceedings - Bolsonaro faces multiple charges, including attempting to instigate a coup and participating in armed criminal organizations, with potential sentences exceeding 40 years if all charges are upheld [3][5] - The Supreme Court had previously planned to hear all testimonies by June 13, but expedited the process, completing it by June 10 [3] - The investigation into the January 8 events, where Bolsonaro supporters stormed government buildings, has led to serious legal repercussions for Bolsonaro and his associates [5] Political Context - The U.S. government has been involved, with reports of Bolsonaro's family attempting to influence U.S. sanctions against Brazilian officials, which has drawn criticism from the Brazilian government [2] - Brazilian President Lula has firmly rejected U.S. interference in domestic affairs, emphasizing the importance of national sovereignty and judicial independence [2] - Bolsonaro has been barred from running for any elections until 2030, disqualifying him from the 2026 presidential election [7]

Group 1: Economic Relations and Trade - Mexico's tomato exports generated $3 billion in revenue last year and created approximately 500,000 jobs [3] - The recent U.S. decision to impose a 17% tariff on most fresh tomatoes from Mexico threatens to disrupt established trade agreements and could lead to the loss of about 200,000 jobs in the industry [3] - The Mexican government emphasizes that the quality of its tomatoes, not unfair practices, has allowed it to gain market share in the U.S. [3] Group 2: Sovereignty and Political Tensions - The Mexican government, led by President López Obrador, insists on resolving internal issues independently and rejects any U.S. military intervention, asserting that "sovereignty cannot be sold" [2] - Historical tensions between Mexico and the U.S. are evident in both sovereignty issues and economic relations, with U.S. policies directly impacting the lives of many Mexicans [2] - Mexico aims to strengthen its domestic market and expand trade with other countries through the "Mexican Plan" while maintaining a firm stance on sovereignty [3][4] Group 3: Regional Cooperation - Mexico is seeking to enhance cooperation with other Latin American countries, particularly Brazil, in trade, technology, and education amidst changing geopolitical dynamics [4] - The current geopolitical landscape presents historical opportunities for collaboration with other countries in the Global South [4]

Core Points - The U.S. has imposed a 40% tariff on Brazil, raising the total tariff to 50%, alongside sanctions against Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Demorais, indicating a significant escalation in diplomatic tensions between the two countries [1][5] - Brazilian President Lula criticized the U.S. for interfering in Brazil's judicial matters and opposed the sanctions against Demorais, asserting Brazil's sovereignty [1][6] Tariff and Trade Impact - The new tariffs do not apply to many of Brazil's major exports to the U.S., such as commercial aircraft, energy products, and orange juice, with over 40% of Brazilian exports exempt from tariffs [3] - The U.S. is projected to have a trade surplus of $7 billion with Brazil in 2024, indicating that Brazil is not a trade deficit country for the U.S. [3] Sanctions Against Demorais - The U.S. Treasury announced sanctions against Demorais, freezing his assets and prohibiting financial transactions with U.S. citizens and companies, citing his role in what they termed "witch hunts" against U.S. interests [4][5] - Demorais has been accused of human rights violations and political persecution related to former President Bolsonaro's legal troubles [4][5] Brazilian Government's Response - The Brazilian government views the U.S. trade measures as politically motivated and an infringement on its sovereignty, with officials asserting the need to maintain judicial independence [5][6] - Brazil's Foreign Minister reiterated the country's willingness to negotiate on tariff issues but emphasized that Bolsonaro's judicial case should not be part of those discussions [7] Political Context - Former President Trump has criticized the Brazilian judiciary's actions against Bolsonaro, framing them as a threat to U.S. national security and foreign policy [5] - Lula has indicated that if Trump's threats materialize, Brazil is considering retaliatory tariffs on certain U.S. products [7]

以色列国防部长与司法部长发表联合声明，声称以色列在约旦河西岸拥有主权存在的机会。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Colombian President Petro criticized U.S. Secretary of State Rubio's comments regarding the conviction of former President Uribe, claiming it interferes with Colombia's judicial matters and infringes on national sovereignty [1] Group 1: Political Context - The Colombian Foreign Minister, Rosa Biabey, emphasized the country's judicial independence in response to the U.S. Secretary of State's remarks [1] - The Colombian Criminal Circuit Court found former President Uribe guilty of "criminal bribery" and "procedural fraud," while the charge of "simple bribery" was not established [1]

Core Points - Russian President Putin emphasized the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria during a conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu [1] Group 1 - The conversation highlights Russia's stance on maintaining Syria's sovereignty [1] - The dialogue indicates ongoing geopolitical discussions involving key players in the region [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent tariff agreement between the Philippines and the United States has sparked significant controversy, with concerns that it may push the Philippines into a confrontational stance against China, despite internal military opposition to U.S. influence [1][6]. Summary by Sections Tariff Agreement - The tariff agreement is perceived as highly unfair, with the U.S. reducing tariffs on Philippine goods by only 1 percentage point, from 20% to 19%, while demanding zero tariffs on U.S. products from the Philippines, which is seen as a detrimental trade-off [3][4]. - The agreement is criticized for its moral implications, as it is believed to sacrifice the welfare of the Filipino people for economic gain [3]. Military Implications - The agreement includes military conditions that could turn the Philippines into a frontline state against China, with the U.S. planning to deploy advanced military systems, including the "Thad" missile system and other military assets, within the Philippines [3][4]. - The U.S. is expected to profit from arms sales to the Philippines, selling outdated weapons at high prices, which will significantly increase the Philippines' defense spending and ongoing maintenance costs [4][6]. Economic Consequences - The economic impact of the agreement may lead to fierce competition for local businesses from U.S. products, potentially harming domestic employment and income levels [6]. - The Philippines risks losing its relationship with China, which has been a significant source of investment and trade, as the agreement may lead to deteriorating ties with Beijing [6][8]. Domestic Opposition - There is a growing internal opposition within the Philippines, with some military figures warning against the dangers of U.S. dependency, likening the situation to Ukraine's experience [7][10]. - The Philippine military is divided into pro-U.S. factions and those who recognize the risks of aligning too closely with American interests, indicating a significant ideological split within the country [7][10]. Future Outlook - The Philippines faces a critical choice between continuing to align with the U.S. or pursuing a cooperative relationship with China, which could determine its future stability and prosperity [8][10]. - The potential for civil unrest is increasing, as public sentiment against U.S. influence grows, which could threaten the current government's stability if not addressed [10].

Group 1 - Brazilian President Lula stated that Brazil remains open to negotiating tariff issues but has not received any communication from the U.S. expressing a desire for dialogue [1] - Lula emphasized that the outcome of former President Bolsonaro's case will be determined by the Brazilian judiciary [1] - Brazil firmly upholds its national sovereignty and does not accept interference from any country [1]