Core Viewpoint - The Munich Security Conference (MSC) highlighted significant divisions and tensions in transatlantic relations, marking a "critical turning point" where the relationship between Europe and the U.S. is unlikely to return to its previous state [1][2]. Group 1: Disagreements and Tensions - The MSC featured a heated exchange between U.S. and European representatives regarding the state of the international order, with the U.S. denying claims of its destruction and asserting its role in saving a "crumbling" order, while Europe emphasized the need for equality among nations [1][2]. - The 2026 Munich Security Report criticized the U.S. as the most notable disruptor of the post-war international order, indicating that the discord between the U.S. and Europe has evolved from specific policy disagreements to fundamental differences in the understanding of alliance principles [2][3]. - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio acknowledged shared values between the U.S. and Europe but criticized Europe on defense, immigration, and climate policies, suggesting that Europe should be more self-reliant rather than dependent on U.S. protection [2][3]. Group 2: European Response and Autonomy - European leaders expressed a growing urgency for greater autonomy, with the MSC chair highlighting unprecedented anxiety regarding the transatlantic relationship and questioning whether the U.S. still values its allies [6][7]. - EU Commission President von der Leyen warned of external threats aimed at undermining the EU from within, asserting that Europe must achieve greater independence [7]. - French President Macron and UK Prime Minister Starmer emphasized the need for Europe to defend its interests and build its own "hard power" to deter aggression, reflecting a shift towards a more self-sufficient European stance [7][8]. Group 3: Implications for Global Governance - The ongoing tensions and calls for multilateralism underscore the need for improved global governance amidst a backdrop of rising power politics and instability [8].

Core Viewpoint - The Munich Security Conference highlighted significant tensions in transatlantic relations, with representatives from Europe and the U.S. expressing starkly different views on the state of the international order and the role of the U.S. in it [1][2]. Group 1: Divergence in Perspectives - The U.S. Ambassador to the UN, Thomas-Greenfield, rejected the Munich Security Report's assertion that the international order is "being destroyed," claiming the U.S. is working to save a "collapsing" order [1]. - EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Josep Borrell, emphasized that international rules must be based on equality among nations, indicating a fundamental disagreement with the U.S. stance [1][2]. - The 2026 Munich Security Report criticized the U.S. as the most notable disruptor of the post-war international order, suggesting that the conflict between the U.S. and Europe has evolved from specific policy disagreements to a fundamental divergence in the understanding of alliance principles [2]. Group 2: U.S. Criticism of Europe - U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, acknowledged shared values between the U.S. and Europe but criticized Europe on defense, immigration, and climate policies, asserting that the U.S. needs partners capable of self-defense rather than dependents [2][3]. - European leaders expressed growing dissatisfaction with U.S. actions, including high tariffs impacting European industries and fluctuating defense commitments, leading to a perception of decreased U.S. regard for European interests [3]. Group 3: Calls for European Independence - European leaders at the conference stressed the urgency of achieving greater autonomy, with the Munich Security Conference Chairman Wolfgang Ischinger noting that the transatlantic relationship is at a "critical turning point" [7][8]. - EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen warned of external threats aimed at undermining the EU from within, advocating for greater European independence [8]. - French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed the sentiment, urging Europe to build its own "hard power" and prepare for potential conflicts [8]. Group 4: Multilateralism and Global Governance - Amidst the turbulent international landscape, calls for multilateralism and improved global governance were emphasized, with German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock highlighting the importance of political reliability and adherence to international order [9].

近来，美国因威胁征收高额关税、武力夺取格陵兰岛等一系列行为导致跨大西洋关系日益紧张。本月13 日，默茨在慕尼黑安全会议上表示，跨大西洋伙伴关系"不再是理所当然"，欧美之间已经出现裂痕。他 强调，欧洲必须依靠自身实力，维护自身利益及价值观。 德国总理默茨18日表示，如果美国通过征收高额关税来对欧洲进一步施压，那么德国和欧洲也将以同等 方式进行回击。 默茨警告称，如果美国"做得太过分"，欧洲完全有能力进行"自我保护"。 德国总理默茨：如果美国认为，他们现在可以违背我们去年8月达成的协议，通过征收高额关税来进一 步施压，那么德国和欧洲也将同样以高额关税进行回击。 ...

而就在这时，第62届慕尼黑安全会议如期召开。原本是全球政要、战略专家们展示才智、讨论全球安全的盛大舞台，但近年来，这个舞台的气氛显然变得 凝重了许多。去年，美国副总统万斯在慕安会上居高临下的言辞，为在场的欧洲政界、军界和智库人士上了一课。那些平时谈笑风生、轻松自如的精英 们，面对这一场教训，显得异常尴尬，场面虽然没有完全失控，但那种不自在的氛围谁都能感受到。进入今年，欧洲的焦虑情绪未见减轻。美国的行事风 格越发让人捉摸不透，从买下格陵兰岛的荒诞言辞，到将贸易当作武器对外施压，再到频繁拆解多边机制，特朗普时代的行为方式越来越难以预测，令欧 洲倍感不安。 在慕尼黑安全会议的舞台上，中国外交部长王毅的讲话犹如一声警钟，直指欧洲的核心问题——欧洲不应被摆上菜单。这一句话既像是对某些人温和的提 醒，又仿佛是在敲响一记警示的钟声。事实上，当大国博弈开始重新划分全球安全版图时，欧洲的声音是否正在悄然消退，成为局外人的一个潜在现实？ 一月份，俄罗斯、美国和乌克兰三方在阿布扎比的闭门会谈悄然进行，讨论的焦点是俄乌冲突的安全问题。虽然场面平静，消息也并未满天飞，但有一个 令人深思的细节引人注目：欧盟并未参与到核心的谈判当中。对于 ...

慕安会开到第二天，火药味就压不住了。 美欧这对老搭档，表面还维持着体面，内里早就裂成了碎片。 不是小吵小闹，是根本性的撕裂。 特朗普政府那套做法，把欧洲彻底推远了。 关税大棒砸下来，防务费逼着交，连格陵兰岛都想直接"拿"走——这不是盟友，这是强盗逻辑。 更早之前，万斯那些话已经让布鲁塞尔火冒三丈。 2025年那场风波不是偶然，是积怨的总爆发。 跨大西洋关系，早就不是"蜜月"，而是"冷战式共处"。 美国这次派鲁比奥带队来慕尼黑，名义上是参会，实际上是来"求复合"的。 就这么放了鸽子。 欧洲人当场炸锅。 这种临门一脚撤退的做法，不是疏忽，是态度。 你连谈都不想谈，还说什么联盟？ 德国作为东道主，在开幕式上直接喊话：回来吧，重建伙伴关系。 这话听着像挽留，其实带着委屈。 可鲁比奥根本不接招。 嘴上说要战略自主，身体却还在等那个"渣男"回头。 他临时取消了和欧洲关于乌克兰问题的会谈。 欧洲人心里清楚得很。 但情人节那天，鲁比奥又变了脸。 他在演讲里开口就说："美国与欧洲，本就一体。" 听起来温情脉脉，像是要修复裂痕。 他说美国不寻求分离，而是要"振兴"联盟。 还说，虽然必要时美国可以单干，但更愿意和欧洲一起做事。 欧 ...

【#先声夺人# | 许钦铎慕尼黑观察：欧洲求"自立"，别把门关紧】在#慕尼黑安全会议#上，美国要求将 跨大西洋关系从依赖转向伙伴，德国总理默茨也强调欧洲需提升自身实力。欧洲虽喊战略自主，但对中 国的调门却越来越硬：倾销指控、关税威胁…… 经济焦虑，正悄悄变成政治姿态。然而，中欧在新能 源、数字技术和AI治理等领域依然存在务实的合作空间。中国产品靠规模、效率和工业实力，欧洲增 长需结构性改革而非贸易壁垒。王毅外长指出，中欧是伙伴，利益交融非威胁。真正的战略自主，不是 把自己圈起来，而是有底气把门敞开。站得更稳，不等于把门关紧。At the Munich Security Conference, the U.S. pushed to shift transatlantic ties from dependency to partnership, while Germany's Merz urged Europe to strengthen its own capabilities. Europe talks about strategic autonomy, but its tone towards China ...

Group 1 - The core theme of the 62nd Munich Security Conference (MSC) is "being destroyed," highlighting significant tensions in transatlantic relations [1] - The conference discussed various topics including European security and defense, the future of transatlantic relations, revitalizing multilateralism, and differing visions of global order [1] - The MSC report indicates that the world has entered an era of "destructive politics," with complete destruction becoming mainstream and the international order facing significant threats [1] Group 2 - Approximately 60 heads of state and government leaders attended this year's conference, which has evolved from its origins in 1963 as a forum focused on transatlantic partnerships [2]

第62届慕尼黑安全会议13日在德国开幕。这一诞生于20世纪60年代、最初仅数十人参加的军事研讨活 动，如今已成为各国政要讨论全球重大安全议题的重要平台。然而，今年的会前气氛颇为"不安"。跨大 西洋关系正经历冷战结束以来最剧烈的"离心运动"。 此次美国方面由美国国务卿鲁比奥率代表团参会，除了他以外，还有50多名美国国会议员和加州州长纽 森。去年慕安会期间，美国副总统万斯在发言中严厉批评了欧洲的价值观等，引发了欧洲方面的强烈不 满。此次大家都非常关注鲁比奥、纽森等人对于当前跨大西洋关系的最新表态。此外，加拿大总理卡尼 也将现场参会并且会发表演讲。上个月底，卡尼在达沃斯论坛期间发表演讲称，"基于规则的国际秩 序"已名存实亡。目前，加拿大和美国之间的关系摩擦不断。 按照慕安会公布的消息，此次会议期间，丹麦首相弗雷泽里克森将现场参会，美国国务卿鲁比奥也将发 表演讲。慕安会出台的年度报告指出，目前欧美之间的冲突已从具体政策分歧，演变为对同盟关系核心 准则的认知撕裂。美国在乌克兰问题上摇摆不定，与欧洲立场相差很大；美国近期不断威胁夺取格陵兰 岛，以及对欧洲滥施关税。这种种行为让欧洲人意识到，必须建立一个强大的欧洲来应对美国 ...

Core Viewpoint - The 62nd Munich Security Conference highlights the shifting dynamics of transatlantic relations, emphasizing that the U.S. has become a significant challenge for Europe, which is now focused on adapting to this changing landscape and enhancing its strategic autonomy [1][2]. Group 1: Security Cooperation - The core of the transatlantic alliance, centered on collective defense, is weakening, as the U.S. is perceived as a risk rather than a protector for Europe. This shift has led to increasing calls for European security and defense autonomy, exemplified by French President Macron's announcement of formal consultations with Germany on European security architecture [2][3]. Group 2: Economic Relations - The economic ties based on free trade are deteriorating, with the Trump administration's abandonment of global trade rules and imposition of tariffs affecting Europe. Despite reaching a trade agreement, Europe has made significant concessions, leading to a realization that it must reduce its dependency on the U.S. and strengthen its own economic position [3][4]. Group 3: Identity and Values - The shared values that once bonded the U.S. and Europe are fracturing, with increasing cognitive dissonance between the two. The Trump administration's policies, which oppose immigration and climate agreements, starkly contrast with Europe's commitment to inclusivity and multilateralism, raising questions about Europe's identity and its future alignment [4].

在谈及德国总理默茨当天的讲话时，克林拜尔表示完全支持。他表示，持续数十年的紧密跨大西洋关 系"确实正在发生变化"，欧洲需要对此保持清醒认识。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 当地时间14日，德国副总理兼财政部长克林拜尔在慕尼黑安全会议期间表示，目前跨大西洋关系中仍存 在诸多问题和分歧，欧美双方在多个领域难以进行有效协作。他强调，欧洲必须继续坚定发挥自身优 势。 ...