Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that China appreciates Russia's willingness to continue adhering to the New START treaty's restrictions for one year after its expiration, emphasizing the importance of nuclear disarmament responsibilities for both the US and Russia [1] - China maintains a consistent stance on the New START treaty, advocating for both the US and Russia to fulfill their special and priority responsibilities in nuclear disarmament [1] - The New START treaty, signed in 2010, aims to limit the number of nuclear warheads and delivery systems deployed by the US and Russia, originally set to last for 10 years but extended to February 5, 2026 [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that China supports Russia's commitment to adhere to the core limitations of the New START treaty after its expiration and emphasizes the importance of nuclear disarmament by the US and Russia [2][3] - China calls for the US and Russia, as the two countries with the largest nuclear arsenals, to fulfill their special and priority responsibilities in nuclear disarmament and to restore the execution of the New START treaty [2] - There is a call for further substantial and legally binding reductions in nuclear arsenals in a verifiable and irreversible manner, which aligns with the expectations of the international community [2]

Core Viewpoint - China appreciates Russia's positive stance on continuing to adhere to the New START treaty's restrictions for one year after its expiration [1] Group 1: Russia's Position - Russian President Putin announced that the New START treaty will expire on February 5 next year, but Russia is willing to continue following its restrictions for one year [1] - Putin stated that Russia would only continue to comply if the U.S. takes similar actions [1] Group 2: China's Stance - China's position on the New START treaty is consistent, emphasizing that the U.S. and Russia, as the two countries with the largest nuclear arsenals, should fulfill their special and priority responsibilities in nuclear disarmament [1] - China calls for the restoration of the New START treaty's execution and discussions on subsequent arrangements, advocating for significant and verifiable reductions in nuclear arsenals in a legally binding manner [1] Group 3: Treaty Background - The New START treaty was signed by Russia and the U.S. in 2010 to limit the number of deployed nuclear warheads and delivery systems [1] - The treaty officially came into effect on February 5, 2011, originally set for a 10-year term, which was later extended until February 5, 2026 [1]

Core Viewpoint - China emphasizes that the development and strengthening of its nuclear deterrent forces are aimed at maintaining national security, territorial integrity, and sovereignty, contributing to global and regional peace [1][2]. Group 1: Nuclear Disarmament and Security Guarantees - The report released by the China Arms Control and Disarmament Association and the China National Nuclear Corporation discusses providing legally binding negative security assurances to non-nuclear weapon states, which is crucial for advancing nuclear disarmament and global governance in the nuclear field [1][2]. - There is an increasing demand from non-nuclear weapon states for negotiations to establish international legal documents for nuclear security assurances, highlighting the urgency and importance of nuclear-armed states providing such guarantees [2]. Group 2: China's Nuclear Policy - China maintains a policy of not being the first to use nuclear weapons and has committed to not using or threatening to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapon states, a stance that has remained consistent since China acquired nuclear capabilities [2]. - The development of China's nuclear capabilities is framed as a means of self-defense, aimed at breaking the nuclear monopoly and coercion by nuclear powers, reinforcing the narrative of promoting peace [2]. Group 3: International Nuclear Negotiations - In response to U.S. President Trump's comments on nuclear disarmament negotiations involving China, the Chinese Foreign Ministry stated that the largest nuclear powers, the U.S. and Russia, should take the lead in significant reductions of their nuclear arsenals, as they hold over 90% of the world's nuclear weapons [3]. - The call for China to join trilateral nuclear disarmament talks with the U.S. and Russia is deemed unreasonable and unrealistic due to the differing scales of nuclear capabilities and strategic environments [3].

Core Viewpoint - The report titled "Providing Security Guarantees to Non-Nuclear Weapon States: From Political Commitments to International Legal Documents" emphasizes the importance of legally binding security guarantees for non-nuclear weapon states to advance nuclear disarmament and global governance in the nuclear field [1][2][3]. Group 1: Report Overview - The report is the first of its kind from Chinese academic institutions focusing on security guarantees for non-nuclear weapon states, consisting of six chapters and approximately 11,000 words [7]. - It objectively analyzes the basic situation of non-nuclear security, major national policy positions, significant implications, and real challenges [7]. - The report aims to gather international consensus and explore practical measures for negotiating international legal documents on non-nuclear security [7]. Group 2: Key Statements from Officials - Cheng Jingye, President of the China Arms Control and Disarmament Association, stated that eliminating the threat of nuclear weapons aligns with the common interests of humanity and that providing legally binding security guarantees is crucial for advancing nuclear disarmament [2]. - Luo Qingping, Chairman of the China Nuclear Strategic Planning Research Institute, highlighted the importance of these guarantees for achieving nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation goals, as well as promoting international and regional peace and security [2][3]. - The report reflects China's commitment to actively engage in discussions on non-nuclear security and aims to encourage the international community to take effective actions on this issue [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government asserts that the request for China to join trilateral nuclear disarmament talks with the US and Russia is neither reasonable nor realistic, emphasizing that its nuclear capabilities are maintained at the minimum level necessary for national security [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Nuclear Disarmament Negotiations** - The Chinese government has noted the discussions between the US and Russia regarding nuclear arsenal reduction and has expressed that it does not intend to participate in trilateral negotiations [1] - The spokesperson highlighted that countries with the largest nuclear arsenals should take primary responsibility for nuclear disarmament and significantly reduce their stockpiles to create conditions for comprehensive disarmament [1] - **China's Nuclear Policy** - China maintains a policy of no first use of nuclear weapons and adheres to a self-defense nuclear strategy, keeping its nuclear forces at the lowest level necessary for national security [1] - The spokesperson reiterated that China's nuclear capabilities and policies contribute positively to global peace and do not engage in an arms race with any country [1]

Group 1 - The article discusses China's position on participating in trilateral nuclear disarmament talks with the US and Russia, emphasizing that the largest nuclear powers should take primary responsibility for nuclear disarmament [1] - It highlights that the nuclear capabilities of China and the US are not comparable, and their nuclear policies and security environments are entirely different, making China's participation in such talks unreasonable and unrealistic [1] - China maintains a no-first-use policy on nuclear weapons and keeps its nuclear arsenal at the minimum level necessary for national security, contributing to global peace [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes that the largest nuclear arsenal holders should take primary responsibility for nuclear disarmament and significantly reduce their nuclear stockpiles to create conditions for comprehensive disarmament [1]. Group 1: Nuclear Disarmament Responsibility - The spokesperson highlights that the country with the largest nuclear arsenal should fulfill its special priority responsibility for nuclear disarmament [1]. - There is a call for substantial reductions in nuclear arsenals to facilitate the ultimate goal of complete nuclear disarmament [1]. Group 2: Comparison of Nuclear Forces - The spokesperson notes that the nuclear capabilities of China and the U.S. are not comparable in scale [1]. - The strategic security environments and nuclear policies of China and the U.S. are fundamentally different, making the request for China to join trilateral nuclear disarmament talks unreasonable and unrealistic [1]. Group 3: China's Nuclear Policy - China adheres to a no-first-use policy regarding nuclear weapons and maintains a self-defense nuclear strategy [1]. - The country keeps its nuclear forces at the minimum level required for national security and does not engage in an arms race with any nation [1]. - China's nuclear capabilities and policies are presented as significant contributions to global peace [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes that the largest nuclear powers should take primary responsibility for nuclear disarmament and that the request for China to join trilateral nuclear disarmament talks with the US and Russia is unreasonable and unrealistic [1] Group 1: Nuclear Disarmament Responsibility - The spokesperson highlights that the countries with the largest nuclear arsenals must significantly reduce their nuclear stockpiles to create conditions for comprehensive nuclear disarmament [1] - It is noted that the nuclear capabilities of China and the US are not comparable, and their nuclear policies and strategic security environments are entirely different [1] Group 2: China's Nuclear Policy - China adheres to a no-first-use policy regarding nuclear weapons and maintains a self-defense nuclear strategy, keeping its nuclear forces at the minimum level necessary for national security [1] - The Chinese nuclear capabilities and policies are presented as a significant contribution to global peace, indicating a stance against an arms race with any country [1]

Group 1 - The Chinese government acknowledges discussions between the U.S. and Russia regarding nuclear arsenal reduction and the potential inclusion of China in these talks [1] - China emphasizes that countries with the largest nuclear arsenals have a special responsibility to significantly reduce their nuclear stockpiles to create conditions for comprehensive nuclear disarmament [1] - The Chinese spokesperson states that the nuclear capabilities of China and the U.S. are not comparable, and their nuclear policies and security environments are entirely different, making it unreasonable and unrealistic to expect China to join trilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations [1] Group 2 - China adheres to a no-first-use nuclear policy and maintains its nuclear forces at the minimum level required for national security, avoiding an arms race with any country [1] - The Chinese nuclear capabilities and policies are presented as a significant contribution to global peace [1]