郭嘉昆指出，中美核力量根本不在一个量级，两国核政策、战略安全环境也完全不同，要求中方 加入中美俄三边核裁军谈判既不合理也不现实。 郭嘉昆表示，中国奉行不首先使用核武器政策，坚持自卫防御核战略，始终将自身核力量维持在 国家安全需要的最低水平，不与任何国家搞军备竞赛。中国核力量及核政策是对世界和平的重要 贡献。 新华社北京8月27日电（记者董雪、刘杨）外交部发言人郭嘉昆27日表示，要求中方加入中美俄三 边核裁军谈判既不合理也不现实。中国始终将自身核力量维持在国家安全需要的最低水平，不与 任何国家搞军备竞赛。 当日例行记者会上，有记者问：美国总统特朗普此前表示，美国和俄罗斯正在讨论削减核武库， 希望中国参与这一进程。请问中方是否有意参加三边削减核武库谈判？ "我们注意到有关报道。"郭嘉昆说，拥有最大核武库的国家应切实履行核裁军特殊、优先责任， 进一步大幅、实质削减核武库，为最终实现全面彻底核裁军创造条件。 ...

郭嘉昆表示，我们注意到有关报道，拥有最大核武库的国家，应该切实履行核裁军特殊优先责任，进一 步大幅实质削减核武库，为最终实现全面彻底核裁军创造条件。中美核力量根本不在一个量级。两国核 政策战略安全环境也完全不同，要求中方加入"中美俄三边核裁军谈判"，既不合理也不现实。中国奉行 不首先使用核武器政策，坚持自卫防御核战略，始终将自身核力量维持在国家安全需要的最低水平，不 与任何国家搞军备竞赛，中国核力量及核政策是对世界和平的重要贡献。 （总台央视记者 申杨） 责编：黄之安、陈亚楠 8月27日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。有记者就美方要求中方加入"中美俄三边核裁军谈 判"提问。 ...

【环球时报-环球网报道 记者 索炎琦】外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持8月27日例行记者会。会上有外媒记者 提问称：美国总统特朗普此前表示，美国和俄罗斯正在讨论削减核武库的问题，并希望让中国参与这一 进程。请问中国是否愿意参加三边削减核武库的谈判？ 郭嘉昆对此表示，我们注意到有关报道，拥有最大核武库的国家应该切实履行核裁军特殊优先责任，进 一步大幅实质削减核武库，为最终实现全面彻底核裁军创造条件。中美核力量根本不在一个量级，两国 核政策、战略安全环境也完全不同，要求中方加入中美俄三边核裁军谈判，既不合理也不现实。 "中国奉行不首先使用核武器政策，坚持自卫防御核战略，始终将自身核力量维持在国家安全需要的最 低水平，不与任何国家搞军备竞赛，中国核力量及核政策是对世界和平的重要贡献。"郭嘉昆说。 ...

8月27日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。俄新社记者提问，美国总统特朗普此前表示，美国和 俄罗斯正在讨论削减核武库的问题，并希望让中国参与这一进程。请问中国是否愿意参加三边削减核武 库的谈判？ "我们注意到有关报道"，郭嘉昆表示，拥有最大核武库的国家，应该切实履行核裁军特殊优先责任，进 一步大幅实质削减核武库，为最终实现全面彻底核裁军创造条件。 智通财经记者 杨文钦 朱郑勇 郭嘉昆指出，中美核力量根本不在一个量级，两国核政策战略、安全环境也完全不同，要求中方加入中 美俄三边核裁军谈判，既不合理也不现实。 "中国奉行不首先使用核武器政策，坚持自卫防御核战略，始终将自身核力量维持在国家安全需要的最 低水平，不与任何国家搞军备竞赛，中国核力量及核政策是对世界和平的重要贡献。"他说。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolving public opinion on nuclear weapons, particularly in the United States, highlighting a significant shift towards opposition against their use, as well as the efforts of the Japan Atomic Bomb Survivors Association to advocate for nuclear disarmament and recognition of the suffering caused by nuclear warfare [2][8]. Group 1: Public Opinion on Nuclear Weapons - In 1945, 53% of Americans supported the use of atomic bombs on multiple cities, a sentiment strongly defended by then-President Truman [7]. - Recent surveys indicate a dramatic change, with only 19% of Americans supporting the use of atomic bombs in 2024, and 36% believing that no atomic bomb should ever be used, marking a 32 percentage point increase from 1945 [8]. - The shift in opinion is particularly pronounced among younger generations, who are increasingly vocal against the use of nuclear weapons [8]. Group 2: Advocacy for Nuclear Disarmament - The Japan Atomic Bomb Survivors Association is intensifying its efforts to gain international recognition and support for nuclear disarmament, aiming for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2024 [4]. - During a recent event, representatives from the association emphasized the inhumanity of nuclear weapons and called for global discussions on their elimination [4][5]. - The association's advocacy is supported by a growing international sentiment against nuclear weapons, with surveys showing that 40-50% of respondents in several countries believe nuclear weapons should be abolished [9]. Group 3: Media and Historical Context - The reporting on nuclear bombings has evolved over the years, with increasing depth and quality in coverage, reflecting a persistent global concern about nuclear warfare [10]. - Research indicates that the number of survivors and their testimonies is dwindling, raising concerns about the future of nuclear disarmament advocacy and the transmission of historical memory [10].

Core Viewpoint - The 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing in Hiroshima emphasizes the importance of understanding the truth about nuclear weapons and the need for global disarmament efforts [2][6]. Group 1: Commemoration and Participation - The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park held a memorial ceremony for the victims, attended by survivors and their families, marking the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing [2]. - The participation scale reached a historical high, with approximately 55,000 attendees from 120 countries and regions, as the city invited all nations with diplomatic relations instead of just those who expressed interest [6]. Group 2: Calls for Nuclear Disarmament - Hiroshima Mayor Matsui Kazumi called for a transformation of the desire to abolish nuclear weapons into a consensus within civil society, highlighting the urgency of dialogue-based security systems amid global military buildup trends [4]. - Prime Minister Kishida Fumio reiterated the need for accurate understanding of the nuclear bombing's truth as a foundation for achieving a world without nuclear weapons, referencing the Hiroshima Action Plan for nuclear disarmament [6]. Group 3: Recognition of Victims - The names of 4,940 individuals who died or were confirmed dead in the past year were added to the memorial list, bringing the total recorded victims to 349,246 [9].

Group 1: Impact on U.S. Ports and Shipping Industry - The Trump administration's proposal to impose a 100% tariff on Chinese-manufactured port cranes and high port fees on Chinese vessels has faced significant opposition from the U.S. port and shipping industry, with critics labeling it as "suicidal" [4][12] - The American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) highlighted that there have been no domestic crane manufacturers in the U.S. since the 1980s, and the limited production capacity of existing global manufacturers cannot meet demand [6] - The Houston Port has a contract with China for eight cranes worth approximately $300 million, and the proposed tariffs could increase costs by up to 270%, jeopardizing port expansion plans [8] Group 2: Trade Negotiations and Economic Consequences - Shipping associations warned that such tariffs contradict the goals of ongoing U.S.-China trade negotiations and would ultimately raise logistics costs in the U.S., leading to higher prices for consumers [12] - Industry predictions suggest that these measures could result in a 15% decline in U.S. port throughput, further diminishing its status as a global trade hub [14] Group 3: Nuclear Weapons Development and International Concerns - The U.S. Department of Energy announced the early completion of the B61-13 nuclear bomb, which has a yield of 320,000 tons of TNT, significantly raising concerns about the potential lowering of the nuclear weapon usage threshold [18][22] - The B61-13's production plan contradicts global nuclear disarmament trends and could trigger a new arms race, as the U.S. has spent over $30 billion on nuclear modernization in recent years, surpassing the total of other nuclear-armed states [24] Group 4: Space Defense Initiatives and Political Implications - Trump's announcement of the "Iron Dome" space-based missile defense system, with a proposed budget of $175 billion, has been criticized for its technical feasibility and potential to escalate the militarization of space [28][37] - The project faces significant funding challenges, as the budget has not been approved by Congress, and there are concerns about the long-term maintenance costs of such a system [37]

Core Viewpoint - China emphasizes the importance of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) in maintaining global peace and development, while highlighting the unprecedented challenges it currently faces [1][2]. Group 1: China's Position on Nuclear Weapons - China advocates for the inseparability of its own security and collective security, calling for the two countries with the largest nuclear arsenals to resume compliance with the New START treaty and further reduce their nuclear stockpiles [2]. - The country urges nuclear-armed states to negotiate a "No First Use" treaty and to abandon nuclear sharing and extended deterrence arrangements, as well as to withdraw nuclear weapons deployed abroad [2]. - China maintains that security rights and obligations are inseparable, promoting a fair and just nuclear non-proliferation system and opposing unilateral sanctions and military force in resolving regional nuclear issues [2]. Group 2: China's Defense Policy and Commitment - China asserts its commitment to a defensive national defense policy, having pledged not to use nuclear weapons first under any circumstances since it acquired them, and not to threaten non-nuclear weapon states [3]. - The country positions itself as a responsible nation, with its nuclear policy being a significant contribution to global peace, remaining consistent for over 60 years [3].