Group 1 - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov stated that the U.S. has informed Russia through diplomatic channels that it is evaluating President Putin's proposal to extend the New START treaty by one year [2] - Putin proposed at a security council meeting that Russia would continue to adhere to the core limitations of the New START treaty for one year after its expiration, provided the U.S. does not take actions that disrupt the existing balance [2] - Lavrov emphasized that Russia does not intend to persuade the U.S. to comply with this proposal, but believes it aligns with the interests of both parties and the international community [2] Group 2 - In response to President Trump's recent announcement about resuming nuclear tests, Russian Presidential Press Secretary Peskov indicated that Trump's statements suggest the U.S. may plan to conduct nuclear tests soon, and Russia requires clarification on this matter [3] - Peskov noted that nuclear testing is a serious issue and related statements should be clear, adding that President Putin has not ordered preparations for nuclear tests [3] - Trump stated on October 30 that due to other countries conducting nuclear tests, he has ordered the Pentagon to initiate nuclear weapon tests, while U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright clarified that the tests ordered by Trump would not include nuclear explosions [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government maintains that its nuclear capabilities are not comparable to those of the United States and Russia, and it deems the request for China to join nuclear arms control negotiations as unfair and unreasonable [1] Group 1: China's Position on Nuclear Arms Control - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, reiterated that China's nuclear forces are not on the same level as those of the U.S. and Russia [1] - Mao Ning emphasized that it is impractical to expect China to participate in nuclear arms control talks at this stage [1] - The spokesperson called on the U.S., as the country with the largest nuclear arsenal, to fulfill its special and priority responsibilities in nuclear disarmament [1] Group 2: U.S. Responsibilities - The Chinese government urges the U.S. to significantly reduce its nuclear arsenal to create conditions for comprehensive nuclear disarmament [1]

Core Viewpoint - The hostile actions of NATO may lead to direct conflict between nuclear powers [1] Group 1: Nuclear Arms Control - Current conditions do not allow for cooperation between Russia and the U.S. in the field of nuclear non-proliferation [3] - If the U.S. rejects Russia's proposal to continue adhering to the core limits of the New START treaty after its expiration, a complete vacuum in nuclear arms control will emerge, leading to heightened nuclear safety tensions [3] - Russia's proposals are time-sensitive and can only be effective under conditions of cooperation with the U.S. [3] Group 2: Military Response and Security - Russia is compelled to adopt military-technical measures in response to the aggressive policies of NATO countries [3] - Russia asserts it will not engage in an expensive arms race but has the capability and resources to ensure its own security [3] - It is unrealistic to pursue nuclear disarmament without considering the military-political realities and security interests of nuclear-armed states [3]