2012年，时任国家副主席习近平访美期间生动讲述了这段鼓岭故事。此后，鼓岭故事鼓舞着两国人民特别是青年一代，跨越 大洋架起一座座友谊桥梁。 习近平被这个故事深深打动，立即邀请加德纳夫人访问鼓岭，帮助她完成了丈夫梦回故土的心愿。 "鼓岭鼓岭，第二故乡今犹在；鼓岭鼓岭，在我心中重千斤……" 7月10日至18日，2025年"鼓岭缘"中美青少年合唱周活动在福州、北京举行。当两国青少年的声线如溪流交汇，带着青春朝气 的歌声轻轻叩开记忆的闸门—— 1992年春，时任福州市委书记习近平在报纸上读到一篇题为《啊！鼓岭》的文章。文章讲述了美国人加德纳对中国福州"鼓 岭"儿时故园充满眷念，渴望故地重游却直到去世未能如愿的故事。 2024年6月，习近平主席在致2024年"鼓岭缘"中美青年交流周的贺信中深情写道："青年最富有朝气、最富有梦想，中美关系的 未来在青年。" 青少年是国家的未来，也是友好事业的未来。中美友好由两国人民共同缔造，更需两国青少年发展传承。 "虽然我们来自不同的地方、说不同的语言，但音乐是我们共同的语言""音乐将我们相连是多么美丽的事，让我们看清彼此心 意相通之处""当我们一起合唱时，无需翻译，歌声本身就表达着最 ...

美中贸易全国委员会当地时间16日发布2025年度《中国商业环境调查》报告。美中贸易全国委员会会长谭森表示，尽管面临压力，对美国企业而言，保持在 竞争激烈的中国市场的运营能力依然至关重要。 调查显示，中美关系继续在美国在华企业面临的商业挑战中位列榜首，而在近期两国贸易摩擦再起的背景下，关税问题也从去年的第八位跃升至第二位。约 40%的受访企业表示已经受到美国出口管制政策的负面影响。 82%的受访企业表示其中国业务在2024年实现盈利，然而，对未来持乐观态度的企业不到50%，反映出对关税和政策等问题的担忧。 80%以上的受访企业表示，在华投资是为了服务中国本土市场。几乎所有企业都认为，在华业务对于维系自身在全球范围内的竞争力不可或缺。 "尽管如此，对美国企业而言，保持在竞争激烈的中国市场中的运营能力依然至关重要。这不仅使他们能够受益于中国日渐壮大的中产阶级消费群体，也为 企业试炼保持全球竞争力所需的新技术和新做法提供了实践场景。"谭森说，在当前贸易磋商中，美国在华企业迫切需要的是终止"一刀切"式的关税措施， 以及更公平和可预期的营商环境。 美中贸易全国委员会拥有约270家在华经营的美国会员企业。本次大部分受访企业 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. Department of Commerce announced a preliminary anti-dumping duty of over 90% on certain graphite imports from China, which are deemed critical components for electric vehicles [1] - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs emphasized the importance of mutual benefit in China-U.S. economic cooperation and urged the U.S. to adhere to market economy rules [1] Group 2 - A report from U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Democrats claimed that China is implementing a long-term strategy to replace the U.S. as a global superpower, enhancing its influence with developing countries [2] - The Chinese government rejected the report's assertions, labeling it as Cold War thinking aimed at suppressing China, and reiterated its commitment to a peaceful and cooperative foreign policy [2] - China called for the U.S. to adopt a correct understanding of China and to engage in actions that promote stable and healthy China-U.S. relations [2]

金十数据7月18日讯，7月18日，外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。林剑表示，"有关报告充斥着冷战 思维，鼓噪大国对抗，渲染所谓的'中国威胁'，实质上是为了遏制打压中国，中方坚决反对。"林剑强 调，中国坚持独立自主的和平外交政策，始终致力于做积极、稳定、向上的力量，无意也不会与任何国 家比拼影响力。中方始终按照相互尊重、和平共处、合作共赢的原则看待和处理中美关系，从来不搞恶 性竞争和大国对抗，无意取代谁、挑战谁。林剑说，中方敦促美方有关人士树立正确对华认知，客观理 性地看待中国和中美关系，停止攻击抹黑和遏制打压，多做有益于中美关系稳定、健康、可持续发展的 事。 （北京日报） 美国会报告称"中国正实施取代美国地位的长期战略"，中方回应 ...

Group 1 - The core issue for American companies operating in China is the challenges posed by US-China relations and tariffs, which have become the primary concerns for these businesses [1][2] - Over 68% of surveyed companies reported being affected by tariffs, with the issue rising from the eighth position to the second in the list of business challenges [1] - The survey conducted by USCBC involved 130 member companies, with more than 75% having operated in China for over 20 years and 43% generating annual revenues exceeding $1 billion [1] Group 2 - Approximately 40% of companies indicated negative impacts from US export control policies, leading to sales losses and damaged customer relationships [2] - Nearly one-third of the surveyed companies admitted to losing market share in China over the past three years, and 75% expect to continue losing market share in the coming years [2] - Despite short-term investment plans being paused, over 80% of companies remain committed to long-term investments in the Chinese market, recognizing its importance for maintaining global competitiveness [2] Group 3 - The report highlights the dual nature of American companies' sentiments, as they desire to retain benefits from past favorable policies while also facing pressures to adapt to changing market conditions [3] - China is viewed as a global manufacturing and innovation hub, providing unique business opportunities for American companies, particularly in tapping into the growing middle-income consumer base [3] - The internal conflict faced by American companies in China complicates their ability to transition and adapt to the evolving market landscape [3]

Core Points - The "Guling Connection" Sino-American Youth Choir Week, held from July 10 to 18, 2025, in Fuzhou and Beijing, involved nearly 30 youth choirs and over a thousand participants, focusing on the theme of "Singing for Peace" [1][2] - This event is the largest thematic Sino-American youth exchange activity since President Xi Jinping's initiative to invite 50,000 American youth to China over the next five years was proposed in 2023 [1][2] - The initiative has significantly promoted youth exchanges between the two countries, emphasizing the importance of people-to-people connections in Sino-American relations [1][2] Group 1 - The event served as a platform for cultural exchange, allowing American youth to experience Chinese hospitality and culture, which many participants noted changed their perceptions of China [2] - Historical ties between the two nations, such as the cooperation during World War II, were highlighted as a foundation for current and future relations [3] - The ongoing challenges in Sino-American relations underscore the need for increased grassroots exchanges to strengthen mutual understanding and friendship [2][3] Group 2 - The event reflects a commitment to fostering stable, healthy, and sustainable development in Sino-American relations through youth engagement [1][3] - The cultural and historical differences between the two nations should not hinder collaboration and mutual benefits [3] - The initiative aims to build more bridges for people-to-people exchanges, enhancing the foundation for long-term cooperation [2]

Group 1 - The upcoming visit of Trump to China in early September is expected to create new opportunities for Sino-U.S. relations, especially following the unusual signal sent by the meeting between former U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Chinese officials [1][4] - The ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and China continue to impact various sectors, with high tariffs on Chinese exports such as solar products and electronics, leading to reduced profit margins and export volumes for Chinese companies [3] - The complementary economic structures of the U.S. and China present significant opportunities for collaboration in agriculture, energy, and emerging sectors like green industries and digital economy, which could drive global industrial development [3][6] Group 2 - Paulson's visit highlights the willingness of both sides to communicate and resolve issues through various channels, enriching the dialogue pathways between the two nations [4][9] - The role of civil diplomacy is crucial in enhancing mutual understanding and fostering a favorable public opinion in the U.S. towards China, which may influence official policies [6] - Trump's visit is likely to focus on economic cooperation, with American companies seeking to expand their market share in China, particularly in sectors like electric vehicle battery technology and high-end medical devices [6][9]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the Chinese government firmly opposes the ideological biases and "zero-sum" thinking of certain American politicians regarding China's influence in the United Nations [1] - The Chinese side urges the U.S. to adopt an objective and rational perspective on China and U.S.-China relations [1] - The Chinese government calls for practical actions from the U.S. to promote stable, healthy, and sustainable development of U.S.-China relations, rather than the opposite [1]

Group 1 - The meeting between Wang Yi and US Secretary of State Rubio reflects the harsh reality of US-China relations, indicating a shift in traditional diplomatic power dynamics [1][2] - Rubio's meeting was seen as a diplomatic "cut-in," highlighting the changing international landscape where allies previously pursuing the US are now seeking cooperation with China [2] - Rubio entered the meeting with dual embarrassment, being on China's sanctions list and facing the impact of punitive tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on Southeast Asia [3] Group 2 - Rubio's call for mutual trust and cooperation post-meeting was surprising given his reputation as a hawkish figure against China, indicating a significant shift in US strategy [5] - The failure of the US's three strategic cards against China is evident, including the ineffectiveness of sanctions, the diminishing influence of trade wars, and the shortcomings of technology containment efforts [6][8] - China's global market share in electric vehicles has surpassed 65%, and the C919 aircraft has received 1,200 orders, showcasing China's growing economic strength [8] Group 3 - The current US-China competition is not merely a diplomatic confrontation but a critical juncture affecting national destinies, with the US's strategic options dwindling [10] - The meeting symbolizes a potential turning point in the balance of power between the two nations, as the US's previous strategies are increasingly ineffective [10]

Group 1 - The meeting between U.S. Secretary of State Rubio and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi marks the first face-to-face dialogue between the two countries since Trump's return to the White House, highlighting the need for communication amidst rising tensions [1][3] - Rubio's visit is overshadowed by the announcement of high tariffs (25%-40%) on eight ASEAN countries and traditional allies like Japan and South Korea, which has led to regional leaders expressing concerns about the economic implications [1][5] - The U.S. is facing strategic pressures, including the impending expiration of a 90-day trade truce and the need to address the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, which has prompted Rubio to seek dialogue with China [3][6] Group 2 - Wang Yi emphasized the importance of grounding U.S.-China relations in mutual respect and cooperation, proposing a three-pronged approach: objective understanding of China, win-win policy formulation, and equal respect in interactions [3][6] - The regional response to U.S. tariffs has been one of caution, with countries like Malaysia and Japan reassessing their economic dependencies and security strategies in light of the U.S. trade policies [5][6] - The meeting, described as "positive, pragmatic, and constructive," has restarted high-level dialogues that had been stagnant for six months, indicating a potential shift in U.S.-China relations despite ongoing trade tensions [8]