有记者提问：特朗普政府将对俄罗斯主要的两家石油公司进行制裁，中方对此有何评论？ 美政府将制裁俄罗斯两家石油公司 中方回应 中新网北京10月23日电 (记者 李京泽)中国外交部发言人郭嘉昆23日主持例行记者会。 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 郭嘉昆：中方一贯反对没有国际法依据、未经联合国安理会授权的单边制裁。(完) 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：徐世明 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 ...

郭嘉昆表示，欧方一再以涉俄为由对中国企业发起非法单边制裁，中方对此强烈不满，坚决反对，已经 向欧方提出严正交涉。 北京日报客户端消息，10月23日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。 法新社记者提问，欧盟于周三同意因俄乌冲突对俄罗斯实施新的制裁。欧盟还将制裁范围扩大到多个国 家，其中包括12家中国公司和3家印度公司，理由是这些公司帮助俄罗斯绕过西方在技术转让，尤其是 军工生产方面的制裁。请问外交部对此有何评论？ 郭嘉昆资料图。图源：外交部网站 原标题：欧方以涉俄为由对中企发起非法单边制裁，外交部：坚决反对 编辑：陈艳琦 责编：张松涛 "我们多次强调，中国不是乌克兰危机的制造者，更不是当事方，一直致力于劝和促谈，没有向冲突任 何一方提供致命性武器，严格管控军民两用物项的出口。"郭嘉昆说。 他指出，包括欧美在内的大多数国家都在同俄罗斯开展贸易，欧方根本没有资格对中俄企业正常交往合 作说三道四。我们敦促欧方停止拿中国说事、损害中方利益，这不利于中欧关系健康稳定发展。中方将 采取一切必要措施，坚定维护自身正当权益。 ...

Group 1 - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed strong dissatisfaction with the UK's unilateral sanctions against Chinese entities, including Shandong Yulong Petrochemical Co., Ltd. and three port operators, for allegedly supporting the Russian energy sector [1] - China emphasized its commitment to promoting peace talks regarding the Ukraine crisis and stated that normal business interactions between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [1] - The Chinese government indicated that it would take necessary measures to firmly protect its legitimate rights and interests in response to the sanctions [1]

Group 1 - The Chinese government maintains that its energy cooperation with Russia and other countries is legitimate and opposes unilateral sanctions imposed by the U.S. [2] - China's export control measures on rare earths are in line with international practices and aim to maintain global peace and regional stability [3] - The meeting between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and Spanish Foreign Minister Alvarez was constructive, aiming to enhance China-Spain relations and cooperation [4] Group 2 - China expresses strong dissatisfaction with the UK's unilateral sanctions against Chinese companies, asserting that normal business interactions should not be disrupted [5] - The Chinese government categorically denies allegations of systematic cyber intrusions into the UK government and calls for an end to such political manipulation [6]

Group 1 - The UK has sanctioned Shandong Yulong Petrochemical Co., three port operators in Shandong, and Beihai LNG Co. for their support of the Russian energy sector [1] - China strongly opposes unilateral sanctions that lack international legal basis and have not been authorized by the UN Security Council, expressing strong dissatisfaction with the UK's actions [1] - China emphasizes its commitment to promoting peace talks regarding the Ukraine crisis and insists that normal business interactions between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [1]

Core Points - The U.S. has imposed a punitive tariff of 25% on Indian goods, effective August 27, 2025, raising the total tariff rate to 50% when combined with previous tariffs [1] - India's Foreign Minister, S. Jaishankar, criticized the U.S. for its double standards regarding energy imports, particularly in relation to Russian oil and gas [1] - India heavily relies on Russian oil, which constitutes 34% of its total imports, providing significant cost savings compared to Middle Eastern oil [1] - The U.S. has been accused of hypocrisy for criticizing India while continuing its own imports of Russian materials [1] Group 1 - The U.S. tariffs are expected to impact India's $48.2 billion export sector, leading to production halts in textile factories and cancellations of sea orders [4] - In response, the Indian government announced a subsidy of 100 billion rupees for farmers and initiated tax reforms to reduce consumption tax to 18% [4] - India is accelerating free trade agreements with the UK and EU to redirect exports towards Latin America and the Middle East [4] Group 2 - Despite U.S. threats of secondary sanctions, Indian ports remain filled with Russian oil tankers, highlighting India's commitment to energy security [6] - India has leveraged discounted Russian oil to offset tariffs, generating significant revenue from refined oil exports to Europe and the U.S. [6] - The situation reflects a broader awakening among Global South countries, with Brazil and South Africa also opposing unilateral sanctions [6] Group 3 - India is considering alternatives to U.S. military purchases, such as the Russian Su-57 fighter jet, indicating a shift in defense procurement strategy [3] - Indian think tanks are advocating for a "China-India alliance" to counter U.S. tariffs, suggesting a strategic pivot in international relations [3]

Group 1 - The European Union (EU) has announced sanctions against 12 Chinese companies in its 19th round of sanctions against Russia, targeting sectors such as petrochemicals [1][3] - The EU's actions are seen as a dual strategy to align with the United States in containing China's development and to pressure China to take a stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict [3] - The EU claims that these Chinese companies are helping Russia evade sanctions, aiming to cut off funding for the war, although this reasoning is viewed as weak [3][4] Group 2 - China has recently exported 2,582 tons of rare earth products to the EU, with a 21% month-on-month increase in exports of rare earth magnets [4] - The EU is highly dependent on China for critical minerals, with nearly all of its rare earth imports coming from China, which dominates the global supply chain for key minerals [4][6] - China maintains that its export controls on rare earths are based on national security considerations and are not aimed at specific countries, emphasizing the importance of cooperation over unilateral sanctions [6]

Core Viewpoint - The China Communications Industry Association supports the Ministry of Commerce's investigation into anti-dumping measures against U.S. imported semiconductor products, emphasizing the need for a fair and open market environment in the information and communication industry [1] Group 1 - The Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China announced an anti-dumping investigation on September 13, 2025, targeting imported related analog chips from the U.S. [1] - The China Communications Industry Association firmly supports the government's necessary actions to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the Chinese information and communication industry and its enterprises [1] - The association calls for global industry collaboration to oppose protectionism and unilateral sanctions, advocating for sustainable and mutually beneficial development through technological innovation and international cooperation [1] Group 2 - The China Communications Industry Association will continue to support its member companies in increasing R&D investment, deepening global cooperation, and enhancing core competitiveness [1] - The goal is to promote the construction of a secure, stable, and efficient global semiconductor and information communication industry chain ecosystem [1]

Group 1 - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs firmly opposes the unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction" imposed by the United States, stating that such actions violate international law and the basic principles of international relations [1] Group 2 - The U.S. Treasury Department has announced new sanctions targeting several Chinese companies involved in transporting military-grade components to the Houthi armed group in Yemen, as well as other companies facilitating the delivery of dual-use goods [1]

Core Viewpoint - Cuba is facing a severe and ongoing energy crisis characterized by frequent nationwide blackouts, primarily due to aging infrastructure and the impact of long-term U.S. economic sanctions [1][2][3] Group 1: Energy Crisis Overview - The largest thermal power plant in Cuba, Antonio Guiteras, experienced a failure on September 10, 2025, leading to a nationwide blackout, marking the fifth such incident in a year [1] - Blackouts last from several hours to tens of hours, severely impacting healthcare, water supply, and daily life [1] - The average operational lifespan of power generation units in Cuba exceeds 30 years, with frequent failures and significant transmission losses due to outdated infrastructure [1][2] Group 2: Impact of U.S. Sanctions - U.S. sanctions, particularly the 1992 Cuban Democracy Act, have severely restricted Cuba's ability to upgrade its energy infrastructure, preventing access to necessary parts and technical support [2] - The sanctions have created a vicious cycle, making it difficult for the Cuban energy sector to modernize and maintain its facilities [2] - Cuba's energy structure is heavily reliant on traditional fuel thermal power, with a low share of renewable energy, making it vulnerable to fluctuations in international oil prices and supply disruptions [2] Group 3: International Cooperation and Assistance - In response to the energy crisis, Cuba is actively seeking international cooperation, receiving a second batch of generator equipment and parts from China on January 20, 2025 [3] - The assistance from China aims to support critical facilities such as hospitals and water supply systems, reflecting a South-South cooperation model without political conditions [3] - The situation highlights the ethical implications of unilateral sanctions and raises questions about the international community's response to countries whose development rights are restricted due to geopolitical stances [3][4] Group 4: Geopolitical Implications - The ongoing energy crisis in Cuba serves as a geopolitical barometer, measuring not only the stability of power supply but also the broader issues of global development justice [4] - The need for a more just and inclusive international order is emphasized, as temporary aid may not fundamentally resolve the underlying issues caused by sanctions [4]