从更宏观的角度来看，特朗普曾计划通过断绝俄罗斯的能源出口，来卡住普京政府的收入，但他的算盘彻底落空了。中俄的合作越走越深，俄罗斯的资金 来源变得更加稳定；欧洲虽然嘴上说要抵制俄气，但实际上又通过各种渠道给俄罗斯开辟了销路。曾经特朗普威胁说，要对与俄罗斯做生意的国家加征 500%的关税，现在看着中俄铁定的合作关系，这些话已经不再有人信了。实际上，俄罗斯将能源以降价的方式卖给中国，正是全球能源格局变化的缩 影。试图通过单边制裁扭曲市场规则的做法，根本行不通！反而是中俄这种互利共赢的合作，正在为全球能源市场带来新的贸易规则。中俄能源合作的深 化，不仅保障了双方的核心利益，还为全球能源市场的稳定与多元化注入了强大的动力。 中国外交部早就明确表示：中俄能源合作是正常的商业行为，互利共赢，谁搞单边制裁和长臂管辖我们都坚决反对！这番话背后，是中国日益强大的国力 和国际话语权的支撑。事实上，中俄的能源合作早已成为老搭档关系，从原油管道到天然气供应，双方的合作早已非常成熟，根本不怕外部制裁破坏。更 有意思的是，美国和欧洲对俄罗斯实施的能源制裁，已经开始面临瓶颈。有数据显示，今年上半年，法国从俄罗斯进口的天然气居然翻了一倍！欧盟 ...

毛宁表示，中方一贯反对没有国际法依据、未经联合国安理会授权的单边制裁。 经济观察网 据央视新闻客户端消息，11月17日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。有记者问：美国 总统特朗普曾表示，他可以接受拟议中的参议院法案中对与俄罗斯开展业务的国家实施制裁这一措施。 外交部对此有何评论？ ...

中方：从来没有、也不会要求企业违法采集或存储数据 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：徐世明 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新网北京11月17日电 (记者 黄钰钦)中国外交部发言人毛宁17日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：第一个问题，美国白宫国家安全备忘录以及相关声明称，阿里巴巴集团向中国军方提供了 针对美国目标的技术支持。外交部对此有何评论？第二个问题是，美国总统特朗普曾表示，他可以接受 拟议中的参议院法案中对与俄罗斯开展业务国家实施制裁这一措施。外交部对此有何评论？ 毛宁：关于第一个问题，有关企业已经作出了回应。中国政府高度重视并依法保护数据隐私和安全，从 来没有、也不会要求企业以违法形式采集或者存储数据。 关于第二个问题，中方一贯反对没有国际法依据、未经联合国安理会授权的单边制裁。(完) ...

俄乌冲突引发的制裁连续剧还在更新，这集的主角居然是钢铁！德国副总理克林拜尔突然喊出全面禁购 俄罗斯钢铁，直接把欧盟架到了地缘政治和经济利益的悬崖边。 一边是盟友施压的政治正确，一边是本土产业要崩的现实危机，这场博弈看得人眼花缭乱，只能说制裁 容易，收场难！ 德国一呼吁禁购俄钢，欧盟内部立马炸了锅，表面上众志成城，背地里早就各怀心思。我算是看明白 了，欧盟的制裁政策从来都是集体喊口号，个体算利益，这次钢铁禁购更是把这种矛盾摆到了明面上。 东欧那些国家首当其冲犯愁，不少中小企业的钢铁原材料几乎全靠俄罗斯供应，真要是全面禁购，生产 线可能直接停摆，到时候失业潮都得找上门。 而西欧国家也好不到哪去，就算能从印度、巴西找替代货源，价格至少得涨三成，企业利润被挤压不 说，最后还得把成本转嫁到消费者身上，物价又得跟着飞涨。 其实这也不是第一次了，之前能源制裁就已经让欧洲通胀高得离谱，老百姓怨声载道。现在又要动钢铁 这块工业基石，我真觉得欧盟有点好了伤疤忘了疼。 说白了，制裁从来不是单方面的打压，而是互相消耗的拉锯战，欧盟现在就是被夹在中间的夹心饼干， 两头不讨好。 德国敢率先抛出禁购令，表面上是彰显欧盟龙头的担当，实则背后 ...

Core Points - The European Union (EU) has included Chinese companies and major oil refineries in its latest round of sanctions against Russia, which has drawn strong criticism from China [1][3] - China asserts that these sanctions violate previous agreements between China and the EU and threaten global energy security [3][10] Group 1: Impact on Trade and Economy - The trade relationship between China and the EU is expected to reach €840 billion in 2024, indicating a strong economic interdependence [5] - Sanctions against Chinese companies could disrupt their operations and lead to lost collaboration opportunities for European firms [5] - European consumers reliant on Chinese imports may face higher prices and fewer choices, particularly in the solar energy sector where 80% of photovoltaic components are sourced from China [6] Group 2: Political and Diplomatic Consequences - The EU's actions undermine political trust between China and the EU, jeopardizing previous cooperation on global governance and climate change [8] - This behavior may lead to perceptions of the EU as biased in international affairs, diminishing its global influence [8] Group 3: Global Energy Market Effects - The sanctions on Chinese refineries have caused immediate fluctuations in international oil prices, with Brent crude rising by 1.6% and Shanghai crude by 2.3% [10] - The EU's sanctions against Russian oil have previously led to an energy crisis in Europe, highlighting the potential for self-harm through such measures [12] Group 4: Broader Implications of Sanctions - The EU's sanctions are perceived as being influenced by the United States, which has profited from the situation by selling liquefied natural gas at inflated prices to Europe [14] - China maintains a neutral stance in the Russia-Ukraine conflict and has called for the EU to reconsider its actions to avoid becoming a scapegoat [14]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of Russia-related issues, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [1][1][1] Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese government has expressed strong disapproval of the UK's sanctions, stating that they are unjustified and detrimental to the normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises [1] - It is highlighted that China adheres to strict regulations regarding the export of dual-use items and that normal business interactions should not be hindered by external pressures [1][1] - The Chinese government urges the UK to correct its actions and withdraw the sanctions to maintain the overall framework of Sino-British economic cooperation [1][1][1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of Russia-related issues, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [1] Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce stated that China has consistently controlled the export of dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations, and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [1] - The UK’s actions are described as unilateral sanctions without international legal justification or United Nations authorization [1] - The Chinese government urges the UK to correct its mistakes and lift the sanctions to maintain the overall cooperation between China and the UK [1] Group 2: Impact on Economic Relations - The imposition of sanctions by the UK is expected to have a negative impact on the positive momentum of Sino-British economic and trade relations [1] - The Chinese government emphasizes its commitment to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, asserting that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [2]. Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese government emphasizes that it strictly controls the export of dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations, and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [2]. - The Chinese side urges the UK to correct its erroneous actions and withdraw the sanctions to maintain the overall framework of Sino-British economic cooperation [2]. - The Chinese government asserts its commitment to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises affected by these sanctions [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of Russia-related issues, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [2]. Group 1: Response to Sanctions - The Chinese government has stated that it strictly controls the export of dual-use items in accordance with laws and regulations, and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [2]. - The UK’s actions are viewed as a disregard for China's diplomatic efforts and the positive momentum in Sino-British economic relations, prompting a call for the UK to correct its mistakes and lift the sanctions [2]. - The Chinese government asserts its commitment to safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises affected by these sanctions [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the UK's unilateral sanctions against 11 Chinese companies under the pretext of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and negatively impact Sino-British economic relations [2]. Group 1 - The UK announced a new round of sanctions on October 15, targeting 11 Chinese companies [2]. - China maintains that it strictly controls the export of dual-use items and that normal cooperation between Chinese and Russian enterprises should not be disrupted [2]. - The Chinese government urges the UK to correct its actions and withdraw the sanctions to preserve the overall framework of Sino-British economic cooperation [2].