萨克斯多次批评美国的政策愚蠢。2019年，他因公开指责美国在华为问题上的虚伪行为而关闭了自己的推特账号。当时，他指出，美国在华为问题上采用的 霸凌行为，已经让美国的盟友感到不满。2023年，萨克斯在一次访谈中再次表示，美国花费巨资试图围堵中国，最终却只是在自讨苦吃。他强调，中国并不 是威胁，真正的问题是美国的霸权主义。他警告称，亚太地区的军售和导弹部署将引发冲突，核大国的对峙后果将不堪设想。 华为之所以能够捏住美国的"七寸"，是因为美国的供应链高度全球化，很多美国承包商的业务都离不开华为的产品。据统计，华为在全球5G基站市场占据 超过三成的份额，美国军方在海外行动时，几乎绕不开华为的设备。2024年第一季度，华为的净利润暴增了564%，达到了196.5亿元，手机业务也重新夺回 了中国市场的第一的位置。这说明，尽管美国实施了制裁，但华为不仅没有被压垮，反而在自力更生的过程中推出了自主研发的麒麟芯片和鸿蒙操作系统。 如今，美国如果想要完全规避华为，不仅成本极高，还会对作战效率造成很大影响。 杰弗里·萨克斯，这位哥伦比亚大学的教授，早在2018年就公开批评美国对华为的打压。他曾发表文章指出，逮捕孟晚舟并非出于国家安 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. initially aimed to impose secondary sanctions on all countries purchasing Russian oil, but ultimately only pressured India while being lenient towards China [1][3] - The sanctions intended to curb Russian energy revenue have backfired, as India continues to buy Russian oil and resell it to Europe, undermining the sanctions' effectiveness [1][3] - The U.S. is facing a dilemma between maintaining its hegemonic stance and the realities of its interconnected global supply chains, leading to inconsistent policy decisions [5][7] Group 2 - The U.S. has temporarily suspended the implementation of a 24% reciprocal tariff on China, contrasting sharply with previous threats of much higher tariffs [3][5] - The geopolitical landscape indicates that a potential sanction on China could lead to global energy price increases, highlighting China's significant role in the global oil market [3][5] - The U.S. is using tariffs as leverage in trade negotiations with India, which has been purchasing Russian oil at lower prices, impacting U.S. shale oil interests [3][5] Group 3 - The U.S. domestic political landscape, particularly the upcoming midterm elections, is influencing its trade and tariff policies, resulting in erratic and unpredictable decisions [5][7] - The inconsistent approach to sanctions and tariffs has damaged the U.S.'s international credibility and weakened the deterrent effect of its trade policies [5][7] - The situation presents an opportunity for emerging countries like China and India to strengthen their cooperation and potentially reshape global governance [7]

Group 1 - The U.S. Treasury Secretary, Bessent, is urging Europe to support imposing high tariffs on energy buyers from Russia, particularly targeting China, which has garnered international attention [1][3] - Bessent's call for tariffs is not new; similar proposals were made during the G7 summit in June, where he suggested a 200% secondary tariff on China, but received no support from European leaders [1][3] - The proposed tariffs are part of a broader strategy linked to the upcoming "Putin-Trump meeting," with the U.S. seeking to pressure Europe into joining its sanctions efforts against Russia [1][3] Group 2 - European countries are hesitant to follow the U.S. lead due to their economic ties with China, particularly Germany's automotive industry and Japan's electronics supply chain, which could face severe repercussions from retaliatory measures [3][4] - The previous "reciprocal tariff" policies under the Trump administration have damaged trust among European allies, making them reluctant to support U.S. initiatives that could harm their own economies [4][6] - The unilateral imposition of tariffs by the U.S. is seen as a threat to global trade order, potentially disrupting supply chains and increasing operational costs for businesses worldwide [6][9] Group 3 - European leaders, including Germany's Chancellor and France's President, emphasize the need to protect their own interests and assert that discussions regarding Ukraine's territorial issues must involve Ukraine itself [7][9] - Analysts express caution regarding the upcoming "Putin-Trump meeting," highlighting the challenges Trump faces in negotiating with Putin and the potential consequences of a failed dialogue [9] - The overall sentiment among European nations suggests a reluctance to be coerced into supporting U.S. tariffs against China, indicating a preference for dialogue and cooperation over unilateral actions [9]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the U.S. government's pressure on European allies to unify against Russia, particularly regarding sanctions on Russian energy purchases [1][2] - U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin's comments indicate a push for higher tariffs on countries buying Russian energy, reflecting a strategy to politicize economic issues and exert hegemonic pressure [2][4] - The upcoming meeting between Trump and Putin is seen as a critical moment, with European leaders expressing concerns about potential unfavorable agreements for Ukraine [6][10] Group 2 - European leaders, including German Chancellor Merz, emphasize the necessity of Ukraine's involvement in any peace negotiations and the protection of European and Ukrainian security interests [6][10] - The U.S. has already imposed additional tariffs on India for purchasing Russian energy, suggesting a potential escalation of sanctions if the situation does not improve [5][6] - Analysts express skepticism about the effectiveness of the upcoming U.S.-Russia summit in achieving a ceasefire in Ukraine, highlighting the challenges Trump faces in dealing with Putin [10][11]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the potential extension of the 90-day suspension of the 24% tariffs agreed upon during the high-level trade talks between China and the U.S. in May, with the deadline approaching on August 12 [1][2] - U.S. President Trump has not made a clear statement regarding the extension of the tariff suspension, raising concerns about a possible escalation in tensions between the two economies [1][2] - China's Foreign Ministry expressed hope for positive outcomes based on the consensus reached by the leaders of both countries, emphasizing the importance of mutual respect and reciprocity in negotiations [1] Group 2 - Trump's recent social media post suggested that China is concerned about soybean shortages and urged China to significantly increase its orders of U.S. soybeans to reduce the trade deficit [1] - Despite Trump's claims, analysts indicate that there is little evidence to suggest that China is worried about soybean shortages, and China could source from South America if trade relations do not improve [2] - The U.S. government data shows that as of the end of July, China had not placed orders for the new season's soybeans, reflecting ongoing tensions [1][2] Group 3 - The U.S. administration is considering imposing new tariffs on Chinese imports in response to China's purchase of Russian oil, complicating the trade relationship further [2] - China's embassy in the U.S. defended its trade with Russia as compliant with international law, opposing U.S. unilateral sanctions and emphasizing that there are no winners in a tariff war [2] - Since May, the U.S. and China have held three rounds of trade talks in various locations, with the latest consensus being to continue the suspension of the 24% tariffs and corresponding countermeasures for another 90 days [2]

Group 1 - China opposes unilateral sanctions without international legal basis and urges Ukraine to correct its actions [1] - China emphasizes the importance of equal dialogue and cooperation in the upcoming US-China economic talks [2] - China firmly opposes any agreements that sacrifice its interests in trade negotiations [3] Group 2 - China expresses concern over the detention of Chinese scholars in the US and calls for an end to discriminatory practices [4][5] - China is committed to maintaining close communication with Cambodia and Thailand to promote peace and stability in the region [6]

Group 1 - The United States has issued threats to countries cooperating with Russia, particularly targeting China and India, by proposing secondary tariffs on those purchasing Russian oil and gas [1][3] - In 2024, India imported 35% of its oil from Russia, while China's energy trade with Russia continues to expand [1] - The U.S. Republican Senator Graham proposed a radical bill to impose a 500% tariff on countries that continue to buy Russian energy without providing substantial aid to Ukraine, specifically naming China and India [3] Group 2 - India's oil minister expressed confidence that India can meet its energy needs from alternative sources if Russian oil supply is affected, citing diversification of oil suppliers from 27 to 40 countries [5] - The Russian Foreign Ministry confirmed discussions with China and India to restore the trilateral cooperation mechanism, enhancing India's position on the international stage [5][6] - China has reiterated its stance that dialogue is the only viable solution to the Ukraine crisis and opposes unilateral sanctions, indicating potential countermeasures if the U.S. implements secondary tariffs [5][6] Group 3 - Russia has shown resilience against U.S. threats, with plans to accelerate de-dollarization and increase trade settlements in local currencies with China and other countries [8] - The trend of global economic integration suggests that U.S. unilateral sanctions may lead to a backlash, diminishing its global influence [8] - Emerging countries are shifting from passive responses to actively shaping international order, as seen in India's balancing act between the U.S. and Russia and the revival of trilateral cooperation with China and Russia [8]

Group 1: Open Market Operations - The central bank conducted a 7-day reverse repurchase operation on July 21, with a fixed rate and a total amount of 170.7 billion yuan, at an interest rate of 1.40%, with the same amount being awarded [1] - On the same day, 226.2 billion yuan of reverse repos matured, resulting in a net withdrawal of 55.5 billion yuan [1] Group 2: Funding Conditions - The overnight repurchase weighted average rate (DR001) for deposit-taking institutions decreased by nearly 10 basis points, returning to around 1.35% [3] - The latest overnight financing rate in the U.S. is 4.34% [3] Group 3: Interbank Certificates of Deposit - The latest transaction rate for one-year interbank certificates of deposit among major banks is around 1.63%, showing a slight increase from the previous day [6] Group 4: Bond Market - Major interbank interest rate bonds saw yields rise across the board, with mid- to long-term bonds showing significant weakness [8] - Government bond futures closed lower across the board, with the 30-year main contract down 0.46%, the 10-year down 0.05%, the 5-year down 0.05%, and the 2-year down 0.01% [11] Group 5: Economic Policies and Developments - The Ministry of Commerce responded to the EU's sanctions against Chinese enterprises and financial institutions, urging the EU to cease its actions, which are seen as detrimental to China-EU economic relations [12] - The LPR (Loan Prime Rate) remained stable, with the one-year LPR at 3% and the five-year LPR at 3.5%, aligning with market expectations [12] - The Ministry of Commerce highlighted the promotion of e-commerce and digital business as a means to enhance consumption and economic transformation [12] Group 6: Global Macro Developments - In Japan, the ruling coalition of the Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito failed to secure a majority in the House of Councillors for the first time since its establishment in 1955, leading to internal party tensions [14] Group 7: Bond Market Events - The scale of bond index funds reached nearly 1.5 trillion yuan in Q2, with major players like Bosera, Southern, and GF exceeding 100 billion yuan [16] - The issuance of Sci-Tech bonds surpassed 760 billion yuan, with banks and ETFs actively participating [16] - Chow Tai Fook completed the issuance of an 850 million HKD convertible bond [16]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government expresses strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition to the European Union's decision to include certain Chinese enterprises and financial institutions in its 18th round of sanctions against Russia, emphasizing that such actions lack international legal basis and violate the consensus spirit between China and the EU [1] Group 1 - The EU's unilateral sanctions against Chinese entities are viewed as disregarding China's repeated negotiations and objections [1] - The Chinese government condemns the sanctions as unjustified, labeling the accusations against the two Chinese financial institutions as "groundless" [1] - The sanctions are believed to have a serious negative impact on China-EU economic and trade relations, as well as financial cooperation [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government urges the EU to immediately cease its erroneous actions of sanctioning Chinese enterprises and financial institutions [1] - Measures will be taken by the Chinese government to firmly protect the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises and financial institutions [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights China's strong opposition to the European Union's decision to include certain Chinese enterprises and financial institutions in the sanctions list during the 18th round of sanctions against Russia, emphasizing the lack of legal basis for such actions and the negative impact on China-EU economic and financial relations [1]. Group 1 - The EU has unilaterally included Chinese enterprises and financial institutions in its sanctions list, disregarding China's repeated objections [1]. - China expresses strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition to the sanctions imposed on its entities, labeling the accusations as baseless [1]. - The Chinese government calls for the EU to immediately cease its actions against Chinese enterprises and financial institutions, asserting that it will take necessary measures to protect their legitimate rights and interests [1].