Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office, Zhang Han, emphasized that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, and its status is clear and well-established. The future of Taiwan can only be determined by the 1.4 billion Chinese people, including those in Taiwan [1] Group 1 - Zhang Han responded to recent statements by Lai Ching-te, asserting that Taiwan does not belong to China and that its future is determined by the 23 million people living there [1] - The spokesperson highlighted that advocating for "Taiwan independence" leads to war and is a dead end, stressing the strong determination and capability of the Chinese people to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity [1] - The historical trend towards unification of China is described as unstoppable [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the historical significance of Taiwan's return to China after World War II and condemns Japan's current leadership for provocative statements regarding Taiwan, which undermine international law and the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Context - Taiwan has been an inseparable part of China's territory since ancient times, and Japan is obligated to adhere to the One China principle as part of its political commitments and international legal obligations [2]. - The 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement recognized the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China and affirmed Japan's understanding of Taiwan as part of China [2]. - The 1978 Treaty of Peace and Friendship between China and Japan established the legal norms for Sino-Japanese relations, reiterating the importance of the principles outlined in the Joint Statement [2]. Group 2: Current Political Situation - The Taiwan issue is an internal matter for China, and the One China principle is a widely accepted international consensus confirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 [3]. - Any foreign interference in China's internal affairs, particularly regarding Taiwan, is intolerable, and threats of military action are unacceptable [3]. - The current Chinese government and people are resolute in defending national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and any attempts to separate Taiwan from China will face strong resistance [3]. Group 3: Sino-Japanese Relations - The stability and development of Sino-Japanese relations depend on a solid political foundation, and Japan's current leadership is seen as misjudging the situation and acting against the prevailing trends [3]. - Japan is urged to adhere to its long-standing political commitments, cease actions that undermine the post-war international order, and retract erroneous statements regarding Taiwan [3].

Core Viewpoint - Japan's recent deployment of missiles in a sensitive area near Taiwan, only 110 kilometers away, is escalating regional tensions and is viewed as a dangerous provocation by China [1] Group 1: Japan's Military Actions - Japan's deployment of offensive weapons near Taiwan is seen as a deliberate attempt to create regional tension and provoke military confrontation [1] - The move is in violation of the Potsdam Declaration, which prohibits Japan from rearming, and contradicts Japan's "peace constitution" that emphasizes a defensive military posture [1] Group 2: Regional Implications - The actions of Japan's right-wing forces are perceived as a significant threat, as they seek to break free from the constraints of the "peace constitution" and pursue militarization [1] - There is a strong warning that such militarization could lead Japan and the region towards disaster [1] Group 3: China's Stance - China firmly asserts that Taiwan is an integral part of its territory and will not tolerate external interference in Taiwan affairs [1] - The Chinese government expresses a strong commitment and capability to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity against any foreign intervention [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing military tensions in the region due to Japan's deployment of missiles near Taiwan, emphasizing the potential dangers of this action and China's firm stance on Taiwan's sovereignty [2]. Group 1 - Japan's deployment of offensive weapons near Taiwan is seen as a deliberate attempt to escalate regional tensions and provoke military confrontation [2]. - The article highlights that Japan's actions contradict the Potsdam Declaration, which prohibits Japan from rearming, and challenges the principles of its "peace constitution" that advocates for self-defense [2]. - There is a warning about the resurgence of Japanese militarism, driven by right-wing forces, which could lead Japan and the region towards disaster [2]. Group 2 - The Chinese government asserts that Taiwan is an integral part of China and firmly opposes any external interference in Taiwan affairs [2]. - The article emphasizes China's determination and capability to defend its national sovereignty and territorial integrity against any foreign intervention [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of mutual support on core interests between China and Central Asian countries, highlighting the commitment to a China-Central Asia community of shared destiny [1] - China expresses its role as a steadfast supporter and strong defender of peace, stability, and development in Central Asia, opposing any interference in the internal affairs of these nations [1] - The collective stance of the three Central Asian countries reinforces the one-China principle, opposing any form of "Taiwan independence" and supporting China's efforts for national reunification [1] Group 2 - The statement underscores the historical context of Taiwan's return to China as stipulated in international documents, asserting Japan's obligation to adhere to these agreements as a defeated nation in World War II [2] - It criticizes the current Japanese leadership for sending erroneous signals regarding military intervention in Taiwan, which is seen as a violation of established red lines [2] - The necessity for Japan to reflect on its historical actions and adhere to commitments made in political documents regarding Taiwan is emphasized, with a warning against the resurgence of militarism [3]

Core Points - The Chinese government expressed strong opposition to Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, which were deemed a serious challenge to China's core interests [1][2] - The letter from China's UN representative will be distributed as an official document to all UN member states, highlighting the severity of the situation [1] - The remarks made by Kishi are viewed as a violation of international law and a threat to the post-war international order, provoking the sentiments of over 1.4 billion Chinese people and nations affected by Japanese aggression [2] Summary by Sections - **China's Position**: The letter emphasizes that Kishi's statements represent a dangerous escalation, marking the first time a Japanese leader has linked Taiwan issues with Japan's collective self-defense [1][2] - **International Law Violations**: Kishi's comments are characterized as a blatant provocation that undermines international law and the basic principles of international relations, calling for Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities [2] - **Taiwan's Status**: The letter reiterates that Taiwan is an integral part of China, and any foreign interference in resolving Taiwan issues is unacceptable [2]

Core Points - The Chinese government expresses strong opposition to Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, marking a significant escalation in rhetoric since World War II [1][2] - The letter emphasizes that Taiwan is an integral part of China and that any foreign interference in the Taiwan issue is unacceptable [2] Group 1 - The remarks made by Kishi Nobuo in the Japanese Diet are described as a blatant provocation, linking Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense for the first time [1] - The Chinese representative states that such comments violate international law and disrupt the post-war international order, challenging the core interests of China [2] - The letter will be distributed as an official document to all member states of the United Nations [2] Group 2 - The Chinese government warns that any military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait would be considered an act of aggression, and China will exercise its right to self-defense as per the UN Charter [2] - The letter calls for Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities as a defeated nation in World War II and to adhere to its political commitments regarding Taiwan [2]

Core Viewpoint - The letter from China's permanent representative to the UN, Fu Cong, expresses strong opposition to Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, marking a significant escalation in tensions between China and Japan [1][2]. Group 1: China's Position - Fu Cong's letter states that Kishida's comments represent the first time since Japan's defeat in 1945 that a Japanese leader has openly linked Taiwan issues with Japan's collective self-defense, indicating a dangerous ambition for military intervention [1]. - The remarks are described as a serious violation of international law and a blatant provocation against the Chinese people and other Asian nations that suffered from Japanese aggression [2]. Group 2: Taiwan Issue - The letter emphasizes that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, and the resolution of the Taiwan issue is a matter for the Chinese people alone, rejecting any foreign interference [2]. - Fu Cong warns that any military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait would be considered an act of aggression, and China would firmly exercise its right to self-defense as granted by the UN Charter and international law [2]. Group 3: Historical Context - The letter calls for Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities as a defeated nation in World War II and to adhere to its political commitments regarding Taiwan, urging Japan to cease provocative actions and retract its erroneous statements [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's strong opposition to Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, emphasizing that such statements challenge China's core interests and violate international law [1][2]. Group 1 - China's permanent representative to the UN, Fu Cong, expressed that Kishida's comments represent the first time since Japan's defeat in 1945 that a Japanese leader has openly linked Taiwan issues with Japan's collective self-defense, indicating a dangerous ambition for military intervention [1]. - The remarks are seen as a blatant provocation against over 1.4 billion Chinese people and nations in Asia that suffered from Japanese aggression, undermining the post-war international order [2]. - China asserts that the resolution of the Taiwan issue is a matter for the Chinese people alone, rejecting any foreign interference and warning that any military intervention by Japan would be considered an act of aggression [2].

Core Points - The letter from China's permanent representative to the UN, Fu Cong, addresses provocative remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida regarding Taiwan, marking a significant escalation in rhetoric since Japan's defeat in 1945 [1] - Fu Cong emphasizes that Kishida's statements represent a dangerous challenge to China's core interests and violate international law and basic principles of international relations [1] - The letter will be distributed as an official document to all UN member states, highlighting China's strong opposition to Japan's remarks [2] Summary by Sections - **China's Position**: Fu Cong articulates China's strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to Kishida's comments, which are seen as a direct threat to China's sovereignty and territorial integrity [1] - **Historical Context**: The letter references Japan's historical responsibilities as a defeated nation in World War II, urging Japan to reflect on its past and adhere to political commitments regarding Taiwan [1] - **International Implications**: The remarks are described as a serious disruption to the post-war international order and a provocation to both the Chinese people and nations in Asia that suffered from Japanese aggression [1]