【环球网报道 记者 张江平】综合乌克兰"Strana.ua"新闻网等媒体20日报道，对于格陵兰岛问题，乌克 兰总统泽连斯基对记者称，乌方尊重丹麦及其主权和领土完整，希望美方能够"通过外交途径倾听欧洲 的声音"。 近日，美国关于控制格陵兰岛的企图引发多方不满。此外，美国总统特朗普17日还宣布，美国将对丹 麦、挪威、瑞典、法国、德国、英国、荷兰和芬兰的输美商品采取有关关税措施，直到相关方就美 国"全面、彻底购买格陵兰岛"达成协议。法国、英国等多个欧洲国家对美方这一决定表示不满。 格陵兰岛自治政府总理延斯-弗雷德里克·尼尔森19日在社交媒体上发帖，就其他国家的支持表示欢 迎。"美方最新发表的言论，包括关税威胁，不会改变我们的立场。"尼尔森补充称，"我们在对话、尊 重和国际法方面立场坚定。" 乌克兰"RBC.UA"新闻网报道称，泽连斯基还称，丹麦方面暂未向乌克兰提出向格陵兰岛派兵的请求。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has ruled out the possibility of U.S. military action within Mexico to combat drug cartels during a phone call with U.S. President Trump [1][2] - Sheinbaum emphasized that the proposal to send U.S. troops to Mexico to fight drug cartels is "not on the table" [2] - Sheinbaum reiterated Mexico's constitutional stance against any form of military intervention, particularly in relation to the situation in Venezuela [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian Foreign Ministry condemned the illegal entry of the Israeli Foreign Minister into the Somaliland region, asserting that this act constitutes a blatant violation of Somalia's national sovereignty and territorial integrity [1] Group 1: International Relations - The Iranian Foreign Ministry emphasized the need for the international community to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Somalia, an independent nation [1] - There is a call for enhanced cooperation between the international community, Islamic countries, and African nations to prevent the erosion of Somalia's sovereignty [1] Group 2: Somaliland's Status - Somaliland, located in northern Somalia, declared independence in the 1990s but has not received international recognition [1] - Israel officially recognized Somaliland as an "independent sovereign state" on December 26, 2025, and signed an agreement to establish diplomatic relations, which has faced condemnation from multiple countries [1] Group 3: Reactions - The visit of Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen to Somaliland on June 6 has been publicly criticized by the Somali government [1]

Core Viewpoint - Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau emphasized that the future of Greenland is solely determined by the people of Greenland and Denmark, in response to U.S. threats of annexation [1][2]. Group 1 - Trudeau stated, "The future of Greenland is entirely up to the people of Greenland and Denmark" during a press conference in Paris [2]. - European leaders issued a joint statement supporting Greenland, asserting that the island belongs to its people [2]. - Trudeau met with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, reinforcing Canada's support for Denmark's sovereignty and territorial integrity, including Greenland, which must be respected under international law [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the geopolitical tensions surrounding Greenland, particularly in light of U.S. President Trump's comments about the need for Greenland for defense purposes, and France's reaffirmation of support for Denmark and Greenland's sovereignty [1]. Group 1: Geopolitical Context - The U.S. has expressed interest in Greenland, with President Trump stating that "we absolutely need Greenland" for defense [1]. - France has reiterated its support for Denmark and Greenland, emphasizing that the territory belongs to the Greenlandic and Danish people, and decisions regarding it should be made by them [1]. Group 2: Responses from Denmark and France - A spokesperson from the French Foreign Ministry stated that borders cannot be changed by force, highlighting the importance of respecting territorial integrity [1]. - Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen asserted that the U.S. has no right to annex Greenland and called for the U.S. to cease its threats against Denmark and the Greenlandic people [1].

Group 1 - Chilean President Boric condemned the U.S. military actions against Venezuela, emphasizing the importance of respecting national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and calling for the UN to take immediate action to prevent military escalation and protect civilians [1] - Multiple governments and officials from various countries expressed strong condemnation of the U.S. military actions against Venezuela, urging adherence to the UN Charter [3] - Colombian President Petro opposed any unilateral military actions that could escalate tensions or endanger civilians, advocating for dialogue and diplomatic channels [3] Group 2 - Brazilian President Lula criticized the U.S. actions as a serious violation of international law and an infringement on Venezuela's sovereignty, warning that such actions threaten peace in the region [4] - U.S. lawmakers, including Democratic members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, questioned the justification for military action in Venezuela, stating that there are no significant national interests at stake [4] - Former President Trump defended the military actions, stating they serve as a warning to those threatening U.S. sovereignty and safety, while also commenting on potential tensions with Cuba [5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the condemnation of U.S. military actions against Venezuela by Chilean President Boric, highlighting the importance of respecting national sovereignty and territorial integrity as a non-negotiable principle [3] - Boric calls for the United Nations to take immediate action regarding the situation in Venezuela, urging the use of all available mechanisms to prevent military escalation and protect civilians [3] - The article reflects a broader concern that if military actions are accepted in Venezuela, it could set a precedent for similar actions in other countries [3]

Core Viewpoint - Chilean President Boric condemned U.S. military actions against Venezuela, emphasizing that respect for national sovereignty and territorial integrity is a non-negotiable red line [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Political Stance**: Boric called for the United Nations to take immediate action regarding the situation in Venezuela, urging the use of all available mechanisms to prevent military escalation and protect civilians [1] - **International Relations**: The statement reflects Chile's position on international military interventions, suggesting that what happens in Venezuela could set a precedent for other countries [1] - **Call for Peace**: Boric advocated for the reconstruction of a political framework for peaceful resolution in accordance with the United Nations Charter [1]

Group 1 - Chilean President Boric condemned the U.S. military actions against Venezuela, emphasizing that respect for national sovereignty and territorial integrity is a non-negotiable red line [1][3] - Boric called for the United Nations to take immediate action regarding the situation in Venezuela, utilizing all available mechanisms to prevent military escalation and protect civilians [1] - U.S. President Trump confirmed large-scale military strikes against Venezuela, capturing President Maduro and his wife, and hinted that Cuba might be the next focus for the U.S. [3] Group 2 - Cuban President Diaz-Canel condemned the U.S. actions as "state terrorism" and demanded the immediate release of Maduro and his wife, accusing the U.S. of attempting to seize Venezuela's oil, land, and natural resources [3] - Diaz-Canel stated that the U.S. actions represent a blatant violation of sovereign nations and an unacceptable breach of international law, asserting that Latin America is not the U.S.'s "backyard" [3]

Group 1: Core Views - The situation in Venezuela is escalating, with potential implications for other countries in the region, as highlighted by Chilean President Boric [1] - The U.S. military action in Venezuela is part of a broader strategy that may extend to Cuba and Colombia, as indicated by President Trump [2] - The U.S. aims to manage Venezuela until a safe transition of power occurs, with no set timeline for withdrawal [6] Group 2: Military Actions - The U.S. military operation, named "Absolute Resolve," involved over 150 aircraft and was executed under the direction of the Department of Justice [8][9] - The operation included disabling Venezuela's air defense systems to ensure the safety of the mission [9] - The capture of President Maduro and his wife was executed with significant military force, resulting in multiple exchanges of fire [10][12] Group 3: Economic Implications - Trump announced plans to allow U.S. oil companies to invest billions in Venezuela to repair its oil infrastructure [4] - The U.S. maintains a complete embargo on Venezuelan oil, asserting that the country harbors foreign hostile forces [5]