伊朗总统马苏德·佩泽希齐扬（Masoud Pezeshkian）周一表示，即便与美国就核计划的谈判未能达成协 议，伊朗也能够生存。 此前，美国总统特朗普称上周末与伊朗的会谈"非常好"。特朗普说，"我不知道未来两三天会不会告诉 你们好消息或者坏消息，但我感觉可能会有好消息。"他强调："我们取得了一些真正、重大的进展。" 美伊自今年4月启动的谈判由阿曼斡旋，是自特朗普第一任期内美国单方面退出伊核协议后，两国之间 最高级别的接触。这场谈判旨在解决围绕伊朗核项目的数十年争端，特朗普曾威胁，若无法达成新核协 议，将对伊朗实施致命经济制裁甚至轰炸。 阿曼外交大臣巴德尔在X平台上称第五轮谈判 "取得了一些但并非决定性的进展"，并表示希望 "剩余问 题" 在未来几天内厘清。 特朗普希望遏制伊朗生产核武器的能力，以防引发地区核军备竞赛并威胁以色列。而伊朗则坚称其核计 划完全用于民用目的，并希望摆脱针对其石油经济的毁灭性制裁。 美伊代表团上周在罗马结束第五轮会谈，尽管出现一些有限进展的迹象，但仍存在许多难以突破的分歧 点，尤其是伊朗铀浓缩问题。 当被问及伊朗是否可能为达成协议冻结浓缩活动三年时，伊朗外交部发言人伊斯梅尔·巴盖伊（ ...

伊朗外交部发言人巴盖伊：伊朗不会接受暂时停止铀浓缩以确保与美国达成核协议的做法。 ...

Core Points - The fifth round of negotiations between Iran and the U.S. has concluded with limited progress, according to Omani mediators [1] - Iran's Foreign Minister described the talks as the most professional to date, indicating a reasonable path forward despite no agreement reached [1] - U.S. President Trump expressed optimism about potential positive outcomes from the negotiations [1] Group 1: Negotiation Progress - The fifth round of talks in Rome resulted in some progress, but no definitive conclusions were reached [1] - Iran's Foreign Minister stated that the discussions were professional and indicated a reasonable path forward [1] - The next round of talks will be scheduled based on the proposals and solutions reviewed [1] Group 2: Uranium Enrichment Issues - Iran has increased its uranium enrichment level to approximately 60%, which exceeds civilian needs but is below the 90% required for weaponization [2] - The U.S. insists on no uranium enrichment, which Iran's Supreme Leader has deemed excessive and unreasonable [2] - The U.S. Secretary of State acknowledged the difficulty in reaching an agreement that allows Iran to maintain a civilian nuclear program without uranium enrichment [2] Group 3: Sanctions and Military Threats - The U.S. announced new sanctions on Iran's construction sector, which Iran's Foreign Minister criticized as malicious and illegal [3] - The U.S. aims to limit Iran's nuclear capabilities, which could lead to a regional arms race, while Iran maintains its nuclear ambitions are purely civilian [3][4] - Trump has threatened military action if negotiations fail, with Israel opposing any agreement that allows Iran to develop nuclear weapons [5] Group 4: Regional Tensions - Iran has promised to retaliate against any attacks and has significantly increased its uranium enrichment beyond the limits set in the 2015 agreement [4] - The threat of Israeli military action is viewed as a means to pressure Iran into negotiations, although experts believe such threats are not credible [6] - The potential for a broader conflict is a concern for the U.S., which does not wish to be drawn into a prolonged war in the region [6]

Core Viewpoint - Iran has never sought nuclear weapons but considers uranium enrichment capability as an "inalienable right" and a "red line" according to the directives of Supreme Leader Khamenei [1] Group 1: Iran's Nuclear Position - Iranian lawmakers emphasized that any attempt by the U.S. to undermine Iran's right to peaceful uranium enrichment could challenge ongoing negotiations [1] - The Iranian Foreign Minister stated that the timing and location for the next round of negotiations have not yet been determined [1] Group 2: Negotiation Status - Five rounds of indirect negotiations between Iran and the U.S. regarding Iran's nuclear issue took place from April 12 to May 23, with significant differences remaining on core issues such as uranium enrichment [1]

智通财经APP获悉，伊朗与美国代表团将于周五在罗马重启核问题谈判，这场持续二十余年的地缘博弈 迎来关键节点。尽管双方均表示希望通过外交途径解决争端，但伊朗坚持保留铀浓缩权利的立场，与美 国"零浓缩"要求形成根本性对立，使得谈判前景充满不确定性。 伊朗首席谈判代表、外长阿巴斯·阿拉格奇在会谈前夕通过社交媒体划出底线："零核武器=协议可达 成，零浓缩铀=谈判无意义。"这直接回应了美国务卿马尔科·卢比奥周二提出的条件——美国可接受伊 朗拥有民用核能，但必须彻底放弃铀浓缩活动。 关键分歧集中于三大领域：伊朗拒绝将高浓缩铀库存全部转移出境、拒绝就弹道导弹计划展开谈判，同 时要求美方提供"不会再次单方面毁约"的制度性保障。作为交换，伊朗虽表示可接受部分铀浓缩限制， 但坚持必须以解除经济制裁为前提。 尽管伊朗官方强调谈判为"间接性质"，但美方披露包括5月11日阿曼会谈在内的五轮磋商均采用"直间接 并行"模式。这种微妙平衡折射出双方政治考量：伊朗既需通过阿曼等第三方保持外交回旋空间，又难 以完全拒绝与美方特使史蒂夫·维特科夫的实质性接触。 谈判破裂的代价正持续累积。以色列总理内塔尼亚胡周四与特朗普通话后重申："必须彻底剥夺伊 ...

Core Points - The upcoming fifth round of nuclear negotiations between the US and Iran is scheduled for May 23 in Rome, following four previous rounds since April 12, with significant unresolved issues remaining [1][2] - The US has taken a harder stance, demanding Iran completely abandon uranium enrichment, which Iran claims is its inalienable right [1][2][3] - The potential for military action looms, as President Trump has set a 60-day deadline for an agreement, warning of possible military strikes if negotiations fail [1][5][6] Negotiation Dynamics - The negotiations have evolved from broad frameworks to technical details, with the introduction of economic experts in the third round [2] - Despite some initial positive discussions, the US's recent hardline position has raised the stakes, complicating the talks [2][3] - Iran's leadership has firmly stated that it will not relinquish its right to uranium enrichment, viewing it as a non-negotiable red line [2][3] Strategic Considerations - The US aims to leverage Iran's diminished regional influence and address broader issues, including missile development and regional power dynamics, while Iran seeks the lifting of sanctions [3][5] - Both parties exhibit a strong desire to negotiate, which may create opportunities for breakthroughs despite significant differences [4][5] Military Threats and Regional Implications - Reports indicate that Israel is preparing to strike Iranian nuclear facilities, which could escalate tensions if negotiations do not yield results [7][8] - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has emphasized that Iran must not be allowed to possess nuclear weapons, aligning with US interests in the region [7][8] - The potential for military action raises concerns about Iran's response and the implications for its nuclear program, which has developed resilience against strikes [8][9] Conclusion - The outcome of the fifth round of negotiations remains uncertain, with the possibility of breakthroughs tempered by the hardline positions of both sides and external pressures from Israel [4][5][9]

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian Foreign Minister expressed that while the idea of a uranium enrichment consortium is appealing, it will not replace Iran's domestic uranium enrichment efforts. Furthermore, Europe holds no position in Iran's policies unless they change their current practices [1] Group 1 - The concept of a uranium enrichment consortium is acknowledged as a good idea by the Iranian Foreign Minister [1] - Iran's domestic uranium enrichment will continue despite the potential for a consortium [1] - European nations are not considered significant in Iran's policy framework unless they alter their existing approaches [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles revolves around the increasing likelihood of Israel preparing to strike Iran's nuclear facilities amid stalled negotiations between the U.S. and Iran regarding uranium enrichment rights [2][3][4] - U.S. intelligence reports indicate that Israel's military preparations include the transportation of air force munitions and completion of aerial exercises, suggesting a heightened state of readiness for potential military action [2][4] - Analysts believe that if negotiations fail to restrict Iran's uranium enrichment capabilities, Israel may resort to military action as a viable option to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons [4][5] Group 2 - The U.S. and Iran are in a deadlock over uranium enrichment rights, with the U.S. insisting that Iran must not retain any enrichment capability, while Iran maintains that this right is non-negotiable [3][6] - Israeli officials have expressed that military action could serve multiple purposes, including enhancing their negotiating position, preparing for rapid military deployment if diplomacy fails, and gauging domestic and international reactions to potential strikes [5][6] - Experts warn that military action against Iran carries significant strategic risks, as Iran has a dispersed and fortified nuclear infrastructure that could withstand attacks, and retaliation could come from various proxy groups [5][6]

伊朗外长阿格拉齐5月21日重申，无论是否与美国达成协议，伊朗铀浓缩活动都将继续进行。这已经是 阿格拉齐在10天内5次重申这一立场。伊朗最高领袖哈梅内伊5月20日警告称，美国所谓"不允许伊朗进 行铀浓缩活动"的言论很荒唐。而美国国务卿鲁比奥当天则表示，与伊朗谈判的重点是伊朗的铀浓缩能 力。阿格拉齐还表示，目前正在评估是否参加下一轮美伊核谈判以及具体时间。美国与伊朗分别于4月 12日、4月19日、4月26日及5月11日举行了四轮间接谈判。5月11日的第四轮谈判结束后，双方至今都没 有宣布下一轮谈判的时间。路透社5月19日曾援引消息人士的话报道称，伊朗与美国拟于本周末在意大 利首都罗马举行第五轮间接谈判。(CCTV国际时讯) ...

Core Viewpoint - Iranian officials are urging the U.S. to reach an agreement on Iran's nuclear program, warning that negotiations may be in jeopardy due to the Trump administration's insistence on zero uranium enrichment [1] Group 1 - Iranian President calls for "brotherhood" during a meeting in Tehran but emphasizes that Iran will not compromise on its right to peacefully utilize nuclear technology [1] - The Iranian government asserts that threats and sanctions from the U.S. will not deter their commitment to their nuclear rights [1]