此前，银江技术于2025年4月22日公告其因信息披露违法违规被证监会浙江监管局行政处罚。浙江监管 局经调查认定银江技术存在如下违法行为： 一、银江技术未按规定披露关联方非经营性资金占用，2023年年报和2024年半年报存在虚假记载； 二、银江技术未按规定披露关联担保，2018年至2023年年报存在重大遗漏； 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我们！ 2025年12月4日，北京盈科（杭州）律师事务所陈宇霞律师向法院递交了一批股民针对ST银江（维权） （300020）的证券虚假陈述责任纠纷案的起诉材料。 三、2021年至2023年三季度财务报告存在虚假记载； 四、银江技术相关公告文件信息披露不准确、不完整。 银江技术上述行为违反了《证券法》第七十八条第一款及第二款、第七十九条、第八十条第一款及第二 款第三项、第八十四条第一款的相关规定，构成《证券法》第一百九十七条第一款、第二款所述违法行 为。 ...

东旭光电案有了最新进展。12月4日，中信证券公告称，子公司中信证券华南股份有限公司（下称"华南 公司"）为东旭光电证券虚假陈述责任纠纷案37名被告之一，涉诉金额182.82万元。该案确定适用普通 代表人诉讼程序审理。 中信证券子公司事涉收购前"旧案" 公告显示，12月3日，华南公司收到河北省高级人民法院（下称"河北高院"）送达的《民事裁定书》 [（2025）冀民终690号]，裁定维持石家庄中院作出的《民事裁定书》[（2025）冀01民初150号]，确定 该案适用普通代表人诉讼程序审理。 从诉讼基本情况看，该案原告为吴彩泉等11名投资者，被告为东旭光电、东旭集团、华南公司等37名相 关法人主体或自然人。 诉讼理由是东旭光电2015年至2022年年度报告存在虚假记载和重大遗漏、2017年非公开发行股票存在欺 诈发行、未在法定期限内披露2023年年度报告等行为。 原告的诉讼请求包括：依法判决东旭光电赔偿11名原告因虚假陈述引起的各项经济损失合计1828167.34 元；依法判决除东旭光电以外的其他被告对原告的上述损失承担连带赔偿责任；依法判决案件受理费、 公告费等诉讼费用由37名被告承担。 从诉讼进展看，2025年 ...

受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我们！ 一、法院送达核损报告 上海沪紫律师事务所刘鹏律师代理的投资者诉任子行证券虚假陈述案于今日收到核损报告，这也意味着 案件获得新的进展，投资者获赔更快。（刘鹏律师专栏） 回溯此案，跟一纸处罚有关，证监会的《行政处罚决定书》揭开了任子行连续两年半财务造假的真相。 主要违规事实为其控股子公司财务造假。据处罚，任子行被处罚主要源于全资子公司亚鸿世纪相关年度 存在多计资产、多计收入、多计利润等情况。 上海沪紫律师事务所刘鹏律师提示索赔条件为于2021年4月27日-2024年8月10日期间买入，并在 2024年8月11日之后卖出或仍持有而亏损的投资者可参与。（立方数科维权入口） 二、子公司财报造假 经查明，2015年3月，任子行陆续收购北京亚鸿的股权；2017年7月，北京亚鸿成为任子行的全资子公 司。自收购后，北京亚鸿一直独立运营并基本沿用了任子行收购前的管理团队及业务骨干。 2018 年 起，北京亚鸿和任子行 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing legal issues faced by Dongfang Tong (东方通) due to allegations of false statements in financial disclosures, leading to investor claims and potential compensation cases against the company [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Dongfang Tong is currently facing multiple investor claims related to false statements, with the latest case submitted to the Beijing Financial Court [1]. - The law firm representing the investors is actively pursuing additional claims and accepting new clients for compensation [1]. Group 2: Allegations of Financial Misconduct - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued a notice to Dongfang Tong regarding administrative penalties, citing false records in annual reports from 2019 to 2022 [1]. - The company allegedly inflated revenue and profits through fictitious business activities and premature revenue recognition, resulting in significant discrepancies in reported figures [1]. - Specific inflated amounts include: - Revenue inflated by 61.45 million in 2019 (12.29% of reported revenue), 84.85 million in 2020 (13.25%), 125.51 million in 2021 (14.54%), and 160.53 million in 2022 (17.68%) [1]. - Profit inflated by 52.23 million in 2019 (34.11% of reported profit), 58.77 million in 2020 (22.72%), 79.48 million in 2021 (30.35%), and 123.69 million in 2022 (219.43%) [1]. Group 3: Investor Compensation Eligibility - Investors who purchased Dongfang Tong shares between April 29, 2020, and April 15, 2025, and sold or held the shares after April 30, 2024, may still initiate claims for compensation [3].

Group 1 - The company Sanqi Interactive Entertainment has been penalized for multiple violations, including false disclosures regarding shareholder holdings from 2014 to 2020 [1] - An administrative penalty notice has been issued by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) detailing four violations of information disclosure laws [1] - Investors who purchased shares between March 31, 2015, and June 27, 2023, and incurred losses can file for compensation, as the statute of limitations has not yet expired [1] Group 2 - The main violations identified by the CSRC include false records of shareholder holdings, where shares were actually held by individuals other than those reported [1] - There were undisclosed related party transactions, including a significant acquisition in 2018 that was not reported in the annual report, and other related transactions totaling 1.176 billion yuan over four years that were also not disclosed [1]

Group 1 - Dongni Electronics Co., Ltd. (ST Dongni, stock code: 603595) received an administrative penalty decision from the Zhejiang Regulatory Bureau of the China Securities Regulatory Commission for securities false statements [1] - The company was found to have failed to timely disclose significant contract progress, specifically related to its subsidiary Huzhou Dongni Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. [1] - The Zhejiang Regulatory Bureau imposed a warning and a fine of 7 million yuan on Dongni Electronics, along with warnings and fines for responsible individuals [1] Group 2 - Investors who suffered losses due to the false statements can file for compensation, which includes claims for investment loss, commission, and stamp duty losses [1] - Legal representatives are currently assisting investors in filing lawsuits, specifically targeting those who purchased Dongni Electronics stock between March 11, 2023, and January 5, 2024, and held the stock until the market close on January 5, 2024 [2] - Required documentation for claims includes securities account information, stock reconciliation statements from March 1, 2023, to December 31, 2024, and contact information [2]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around a recent court ruling in favor of investors against Mould Technology for securities false statement liability, significantly increasing the likelihood of success for other investors with similar claims [1] - Investors who purchased shares between April 29, 2021, and November 23, 2022, and either sold or still hold the stock at a loss after November 24, 2022, are eligible to participate in the claims [2] - The deadline for filing claims is approaching on November 23, and investors are urged to prepare necessary materials to avoid missing the opportunity for compensation [2] Group 2 - The company faced regulatory scrutiny for information disclosure violations, receiving an administrative penalty from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) in January 2023 for overstating profits by 31.97 million yuan, which constituted 95.24% of the reported profit for 2020 [3] - The CSRC's actions initiated a wave of lawsuits from investors seeking compensation for losses attributed to the company's false statements, with the company currently showing good performance, which may positively influence its ability to compensate affected investors [3]

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit against Shenzhen Zhongqingbao Interactive Network Co., Ltd. (Zhongqingbao) for securities fraud is set to be heard on November 26, following allegations of false disclosures related to the "metaverse" concept and previous warnings issued to the company and its actual controller, Li Ruijie [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - A lawyer team is representing investors in a case against Zhongqingbao for securities fraud, with a court date scheduled for November 26 [1]. - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has issued a notice of investigation against Zhongqingbao and its actual controller, Zhang Yunxia, for information disclosure violations [2]. - The CSRC's investigation revealed that Zhongqingbao's annual reports from 2019 to 2021 contained false records, and the company failed to disclose timely information regarding criminal measures taken against its actual controller [2]. Group 2: Investor Compensation - Investors who purchased shares between March 27, 2020, and April 26, 2023, and still hold them may be eligible for compensation, regardless of whether they sold their shares after April 27, 2023 [3]. - The specific compensation range will be determined by the court [3].

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled in favor of Shengda Forestry, dismissing the lawsuit filed by Nuoan Asset Management regarding "securities false statements," with the plaintiff bearing the litigation costs [1] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Chengyu Financial Court dismissed all claims made by Nuoan Asset Management, which sought approximately 65.92 million yuan in damages due to alleged securities false statements [1] - The ruling is not yet effective, and the impact on the company's current and future profits remains uncertain [1] - Shengda Forestry is currently facing numerous other lawsuits related to securities false statements, with a total of 371 cases reported, involving a total litigation amount of 179 million yuan [3] Group 2: Financial Performance - Shengda Forestry's revenue for 2022, 2023, and 2024 was reported at 1.848 billion yuan, 778 million yuan, and 733 million yuan, respectively, with net profits of -63 million yuan, -1 million yuan, and 12 million yuan [2] - For the first three quarters of this year, the company reported a revenue of 717 million yuan, representing a year-on-year increase of 40.65%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 19.59 million yuan, up 196.44% year-on-year [2]

Core Viewpoint - The report highlights the increasing number of securities-related disputes in Beijing, emphasizing the prevalence of securities fraud cases and the expanding range of liable parties involved in these disputes [1][2][3][5]. Group 1: Case Statistics - From March 2021 to August 2025, the Beijing Financial Court accepted a total of 10,942 securities commercial cases, with a significant portion being securities fraud liability disputes [2][3]. - The total amount involved in securities dispute cases reached 45.928 billion yuan, with an average litigation amount of approximately 4.1974 million yuan per case [2][7]. - The number of securities fraud liability disputes accounted for 99.8% of all fraud-related cases, indicating a dominant trend in the types of disputes being filed [4]. Group 2: Types of Disputes - The report categorizes securities fraud liability disputes into four main types: false statements, insider trading, market manipulation, and fraud against clients, with false statements being the most common [4]. - The majority of cases involve false statements related to financial misrepresentation, misleading statements, and failure to disclose critical information [4]. Group 3: Involved Parties - A total of 45 intermediary institutions have been sued, including 11 securities companies, 19 accounting firms, 6 law firms, 5 asset appraisal agencies, and 4 credit rating agencies [5][6]. - The report notes that investors are increasingly suing not only the issuers but also their controlling shareholders, actual controllers, and senior executives, reflecting a trend towards broader accountability [5][6]. Group 4: Emerging Issues - The report identifies new challenges arising from the complexity of financial products and trading models, including potential lawsuits related to companies facing delisting due to fraud [8]. - There is a growing concern regarding large shareholders' illegal share reductions, which may lead to securities fraud claims, especially in light of new regulations governing share reductions [8][9]. - The report anticipates an increase in civil claims related to insider trading and market manipulation as investor awareness and legal frameworks evolve [9].