Group 1 - The company Sanqi Interactive Entertainment has been penalized for multiple violations, including false disclosures regarding shareholder holdings from 2014 to 2020 [1] - An administrative penalty notice has been issued by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) detailing four violations of information disclosure laws [1] - Investors who purchased shares between March 31, 2015, and June 27, 2023, and incurred losses can file for compensation, as the statute of limitations has not yet expired [1] Group 2 - The main violations identified by the CSRC include false records of shareholder holdings, where shares were actually held by individuals other than those reported [1] - There were undisclosed related party transactions, including a significant acquisition in 2018 that was not reported in the annual report, and other related transactions totaling 1.176 billion yuan over four years that were also not disclosed [1]

"我们正在分批代理投资者起诉。"厉健律师表示，根据司法解释，暂定：在2023年3月11日至2024年1月5日期间买入东尼电子股票，并在2024年1月5日收盘还持有股票的受损股民，可依法索 索赔需提供证券开户信息查询单、股票对账单（2023年3月1日起至2024年12月31日）、联系方式等。 曾代理投资者告赢100余家上市公司并获赔的浙江裕丰律师事务所厉健律师表示，根据处罚决定，东尼电子涉嫌证券虚假陈述，受损投资者可依法索赔。（厉健律师专栏） 【本文由浙江裕丰律师事务所厉健律师供稿，不代表新浪财经的立场。厉健律师，系中国法学会证券法学研究会理事、中国证券业协会证券纠纷调解员，2009年荣获"浙江省优秀青年律师"称号 责任编辑：韦子蓉 2025年11月13日，浙江东尼电子股份有限公司（简称：东尼电子、ST东尼（维权），证券代码：603595）发布《关于收到中国证监会浙江监管局 <行政处罚决定书> 的公告》。 根据最高人民法院虚假陈述司法解释，上市公司等因证券虚假陈述行为导致投资者权益受损，投资者可以依法起诉索赔，索赔范围包括投资差额损失、佣金和印花税损失。 公告显示，经查明，东尼电子违法的事实如下：一、东尼电子重 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 一、维权时效告急 近日，上海沪紫律师事务所刘鹏律师代理的投资者诉模塑科技（维权）证券虚假陈述责任纠纷案再次收 到一批案件胜诉判决。此前经南京中院审理，部分投资者的投资损失与该公司的虚假陈述之间存在因果 关系，因此应当承担赔偿责任，法院判决投资者胜诉。依据"同案同判"的原则，后续符合要求的投资者 胜诉概率大大提高。 目前区间为于2021年4月29日至2022年11月23日期间买入，并在2022年11月24日之后卖出或仍持有该股 票而亏损的投资者均可参与。关于该案的维权时效将在11月23日到期，仅剩十余天。 由于需要准备相关材料，投资者需注意时效以免错过挽损机会。索赔范围包括：投资差额、佣金、印花 税损失，维权主张的是上述区间内的亏损额，与股票后期是否涨回无关。 案件回溯，公司因涉嫌信息披露违法违规，于2023年1月收到证监会向公司出具的《行政处罚决定 书》。经查明，公司通过违规多确认收入、少确认成本及费用方式，虚增2020年度利润总额3197.01万 元，占2020年度披露的利润总额（3356.73万元）的95.24%，导致模塑科技2020年年度报告存在虚假记 ...

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit against Shenzhen Zhongqingbao Interactive Network Co., Ltd. (Zhongqingbao) for securities fraud is set to be heard on November 26, following allegations of false disclosures related to the "metaverse" concept and previous warnings issued to the company and its actual controller, Li Ruijie [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - A lawyer team is representing investors in a case against Zhongqingbao for securities fraud, with a court date scheduled for November 26 [1]. - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has issued a notice of investigation against Zhongqingbao and its actual controller, Zhang Yunxia, for information disclosure violations [2]. - The CSRC's investigation revealed that Zhongqingbao's annual reports from 2019 to 2021 contained false records, and the company failed to disclose timely information regarding criminal measures taken against its actual controller [2]. Group 2: Investor Compensation - Investors who purchased shares between March 27, 2020, and April 26, 2023, and still hold them may be eligible for compensation, regardless of whether they sold their shares after April 27, 2023 [3]. - The specific compensation range will be determined by the court [3].

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled in favor of Shengda Forestry, dismissing the lawsuit filed by Nuoan Asset Management regarding "securities false statements," with the plaintiff bearing the litigation costs [1] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Chengyu Financial Court dismissed all claims made by Nuoan Asset Management, which sought approximately 65.92 million yuan in damages due to alleged securities false statements [1] - The ruling is not yet effective, and the impact on the company's current and future profits remains uncertain [1] - Shengda Forestry is currently facing numerous other lawsuits related to securities false statements, with a total of 371 cases reported, involving a total litigation amount of 179 million yuan [3] Group 2: Financial Performance - Shengda Forestry's revenue for 2022, 2023, and 2024 was reported at 1.848 billion yuan, 778 million yuan, and 733 million yuan, respectively, with net profits of -63 million yuan, -1 million yuan, and 12 million yuan [2] - For the first three quarters of this year, the company reported a revenue of 717 million yuan, representing a year-on-year increase of 40.65%, and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 19.59 million yuan, up 196.44% year-on-year [2]

Core Viewpoint - The report highlights the increasing number of securities-related disputes in Beijing, emphasizing the prevalence of securities fraud cases and the expanding range of liable parties involved in these disputes [1][2][3][5]. Group 1: Case Statistics - From March 2021 to August 2025, the Beijing Financial Court accepted a total of 10,942 securities commercial cases, with a significant portion being securities fraud liability disputes [2][3]. - The total amount involved in securities dispute cases reached 45.928 billion yuan, with an average litigation amount of approximately 4.1974 million yuan per case [2][7]. - The number of securities fraud liability disputes accounted for 99.8% of all fraud-related cases, indicating a dominant trend in the types of disputes being filed [4]. Group 2: Types of Disputes - The report categorizes securities fraud liability disputes into four main types: false statements, insider trading, market manipulation, and fraud against clients, with false statements being the most common [4]. - The majority of cases involve false statements related to financial misrepresentation, misleading statements, and failure to disclose critical information [4]. Group 3: Involved Parties - A total of 45 intermediary institutions have been sued, including 11 securities companies, 19 accounting firms, 6 law firms, 5 asset appraisal agencies, and 4 credit rating agencies [5][6]. - The report notes that investors are increasingly suing not only the issuers but also their controlling shareholders, actual controllers, and senior executives, reflecting a trend towards broader accountability [5][6]. Group 4: Emerging Issues - The report identifies new challenges arising from the complexity of financial products and trading models, including potential lawsuits related to companies facing delisting due to fraud [8]. - There is a growing concern regarding large shareholders' illegal share reductions, which may lead to securities fraud claims, especially in light of new regulations governing share reductions [8][9]. - The report anticipates an increase in civil claims related to insider trading and market manipulation as investor awareness and legal frameworks evolve [9].

Core Viewpoint - Huizhou Intelligent Technology Group Co., Ltd. has received an administrative penalty notice from the Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau due to inflated performance in its annual reports, leading to potential compensation claims from affected investors [1][2]. Summary by Sections Violation Facts - The Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau found that Huizhou Intelligent's subsidiaries, Beijing Rere Cultural Technology Co., Ltd. and Beijing Zhongke Huashi Cultural Media Co., Ltd., engaged in false advertising and other deceptive practices from 2019 to 2020 [2]. - The company inflated its revenue by a total of 59.90 million yuan in 2019 and 96.89 million yuan in 2020, representing 5.08% and 13.42% of the reported amounts, respectively [2]. - The total inflated profit amounted to 14.15 million yuan in 2019 and 17.77 million yuan in 2020, accounting for 0.88% and 8.72% of the reported figures, respectively [2]. - These actions constitute violations of the Securities Law, specifically Articles 78 and 79, leading to the classification of the behavior as illegal under Article 197 [2]. Compensation Related - According to legal regulations, Huizhou Intelligent is liable for compensating investors for losses incurred due to false statements [3]. - Investors who purchased Huizhou Intelligent stock between April 29, 2020, and April 24, 2025, and continued to hold or sold at a loss after April 25, 2025, are eligible to claim compensation [3]. - Required materials for participating in the compensation process include stock transaction statements and a copy of the investor's ID [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Shanghai Financial Court ruled on a case involving false statements in bond issuance documents by Shanghai Huaxin International Group, marking the first securities false statement liability dispute in the interbank bond market [1][4]. Group 1: Case Background - The case originated from a rural commercial bank suing various intermediary institutions, including underwriters and rating agencies, for compensation due to false statements in bond issuance [1]. - The total amount of bonds issued by Shanghai Huaxin from 2014 to 2017 exceeded 40 billion yuan [1]. - The plaintiff, a rural commercial bank, invested over 200 million yuan, and multiple investment institutions have sued Shanghai Huaxin due to bond defaults [1]. Group 2: Court Ruling - The court determined that five intermediary institutions must bear joint liability for the losses incurred by the plaintiff, amounting to approximately 128 million yuan [4]. - Postal Savings Bank and China International Capital Corporation are each responsible for 5% of the losses, equating to about 6.39 million yuan [2]. - Other intermediaries, including accounting firms and credit rating agencies, are liable for smaller percentages of the losses, totaling approximately 2.1 million yuan [2]. Group 3: Loss Assessment - The court acknowledged the complexity of factors leading to investment losses, including macroeconomic conditions and the investigation of the actual controller of the issuing company [3]. - A third-party professional institution was commissioned to assess the losses, employing methods aligned with bond pricing principles and market characteristics [3]. - The assessment distinguished losses across three phases: from issuance to disclosure, from disclosure to default, and from default to bankruptcy ruling [3].

Core Points - The company, Suzhou Victory Precision Manufacturing Technology Co., Ltd., has recently disclosed new investor litigation matters that have been accepted by the court, while previous investor lawsuits have reached settlements [1][2] Group 1: New Litigation - A new lawsuit involving an amount of 313,300 yuan has been filed against the company by five investors, claiming damages due to securities false statements [2] - This lawsuit stems from a 2022 administrative penalty issued by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, where the plaintiffs allege violations of information disclosure [2] - The court has accepted the new lawsuit, but it has not yet gone to trial, making it difficult for the company to assess the impact on profits at this time [2] Group 2: Previous Settlements - A total of 79 investors have reached a settlement with the company, resulting in a total compensation of 9,161,800 yuan [3] - The total amount involved in previous investor lawsuits related to securities false statements has reached 147.72 million yuan [3] - The company will make timely payments as per the settlement agreement and will recognize corresponding liabilities and losses according to accounting standards [3] Group 3: Additional Litigation - The company has disclosed 17 additional small lawsuits and arbitration cases that have not been previously reported, involving a total amount of approximately 270.29 million yuan, which accounts for 10.94% of the company's latest audited net assets [4] - The company asserts that there are no other significant lawsuits or arbitration matters that should have been disclosed prior to this announcement and will fulfill its information disclosure obligations as the litigation progresses [4]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal case against Beijing Oriental Communication Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as Oriental Communication or *ST Dongtong) involves allegations of false statements in securities disclosures, leading to significant financial penalties and potential investor compensation claims [1][2][3] Group 1: Allegations of False Financial Reporting - Oriental Communication is accused of falsifying financial data in its annual reports from 2019 to 2022, inflating revenues by amounts of 61.45 million, 84.85 million, 125.51 million, and 160.53 million yuan, which represented 12.29%, 13.25%, 14.54%, and 17.68% of reported revenues for those years respectively [1] - The company also allegedly inflated profits by 52.23 million, 58.77 million, 79.48 million, and 123.69 million yuan during the same period, accounting for 34.11%, 22.72%, 30.35%, and 219.43% of reported profits respectively [1] Group 2: Securities Issuance Misrepresentation - Oriental Communication is reported to have fabricated significant false content in its securities issuance documents, particularly in the fundraising prospectus submitted between June and November 2022, which included false financial data from its annual reports [2] - The company disclosed a total of 106,024,096 shares issued, raising approximately 2.20 billion yuan, based on the previously mentioned inflated financial figures [2] Group 3: Regulatory Actions and Investor Rights - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) plans to impose a fine of 229 million yuan on Oriental Communication and a 26.5 million yuan fine on its actual controller, Huang Yongjun, along with a 10-year market ban for him [2] - Investors who suffered losses due to the alleged false statements can file compensation claims, with eligibility for claims set for those who purchased shares between April 29, 2020, and April 14, 2025, and still held them by the latter date [3]