伊核问题
Search documents
伊朗称因欧洲三国“不当举动”将暂停与国际原子能机构合作
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-09-21 06:33
英、法、德三国8月28日以伊朗未能履行伊核问题全面协议为由,通知联合国安理会,依据安理会第 2231号决议启动"快速恢复制裁"机制。如果安理会未能在30天内就继续解除对伊制裁通过决议,相关制 裁将恢复。 伊朗最高国家安全委员会20日还宣布,会议责成伊朗外交部在最高国家安全委员会决策框架下,继续展 开相关磋商,维护国家利益。 伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐19日晚在社交媒体平台发消息称,伊朗在核设施受到非法袭击的情况下,仍然与 国际原子能机构签署协议开启合作。他于18日代表伊朗向欧洲方面提交一份方案,该方案可以迅速实 施,通过解决核心分歧,有效防止危机爆发,但欧方并未认真对待。当前风险已升至最高水平,呼吁联 合国安理会介入,以外交对话取代对抗。 中新社北京9月21日电伊朗20日晚宣布,由于英国、法国和德国强行推动联合国安理会恢复对伊制裁, 将暂停与国际原子能机构的合作。 据伊朗伊斯兰共和国通讯社、伊朗塔斯尼姆通讯社报道,伊朗最高国家安全委员会20日晚发表声明称, 该委员会当天召开由伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬主持的会议,会上讨论地区局势并明确,伊朗在当前形势下的 政策是尽可能通过合作维护地区和平与稳定。 声明称,会上还讨论了英、法 ...
因欧洲国家“不当行动” 伊朗将暂停这一合作
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-09-21 01:41
新华社北京9月21日电 伊朗最高国家安全委员会20日宣布,由于英国、法国和德国强行推动联合国安理会恢复对伊制裁,伊朗将暂停与国际 原子能机构的合作。 欧洲国家行动"不当" 据伊朗伊斯兰共和国通讯社20日晚报道,在总统佩泽希齐扬主持下,伊朗最高国家安全委员会召开会议,讨论地区局势和英法德三国近期在 伊朗核问题上的举措等。 2024年9月16日,伊朗总统佩泽希齐扬在首都德黑兰出席其上任后的首次新闻发布会。新华社记者沙达提摄 会议宣布,尽管伊朗外交部正在与国际原子能机构合作、并提出解决伊朗核问题的方案,但这些欧洲国家的"不当行动"将导致伊朗与该机构 的合作"实际上暂停"。 会议还责成伊朗外交部继续在最高国家安全委员会决策框架下展开相关磋商,以维护国家利益。 "对任何一方都没有好处" 为施压伊朗与美国恢复核谈判,英法德三国8月28日以伊朗未能履行伊核问题全面协议为由,通知联合国安理会,依据安理会第2231号决议启 动"快速恢复制裁"机制。这意味着,如果安理会未能在30天内就继续解除对伊制裁通过决议,相关制裁将恢复。 伊朗多次表示反对启动"快速恢复制裁"机制,并于9月9日同国际原子能机构就恢复在伊朗核查活动的可行模式达 ...
中方代表:美方是造成当前伊核问题困局的根源
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-09-20 13:52
Core Viewpoint - The UN Security Council failed to pass a resolution to continue lifting sanctions on Iran, highlighting geopolitical tensions and differing stances among member states [1] Group 1: Voting Outcomes - China, Russia, Pakistan, and Algeria voted in favor of the resolution, while the US, UK, France, and seven other countries voted against it [1] - South Korea and Guyana abstained from the vote [1] Group 2: China's Position - China's UN representative emphasized strong opposition to the push for a "snapback" sanctions mechanism by certain countries, viewing it as unfair and unreasonable [1] - The root cause of the current impasse in the Iran nuclear issue is attributed to the US's unilateral withdrawal from the nuclear agreement in 2018 and the subsequent escalation of sanctions [1] Group 3: Implications of the Vote - The actions of the UK, France, and Germany to initiate the "snapback" sanctions are seen as detrimental to rebuilding trust and resolving differences among parties [1] - There are concerns that such actions could lead to unpredictable and catastrophic consequences, undermining years of diplomatic efforts [1]
热点问答丨恢复制裁“箭在弦上” 伊核问题走向何方
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-09-20 07:23
Group 1 - The UN Security Council did not pass a resolution to continue lifting sanctions on Iran, increasing the risk of reinstated sanctions [1][2] - The "snapback" mechanism allows any signatory of the Iran nuclear deal to request the UN Security Council to restore sanctions if Iran is deemed to have violated the agreement [1][2] - The UK, France, and Germany initiated the "snapback" mechanism citing Iran's violations of the nuclear agreement [2][4] Group 2 - The current impasse in the Iran nuclear issue is largely attributed to the unilateral actions of the US, which withdrew from the nuclear deal in 2018 and reinstated sanctions [3] - Since the US withdrawal, Iran has gradually ceased compliance with parts of the nuclear agreement, although it maintains that these measures are reversible [3] - The US has pressured Iran to negotiate by threatening military action, but Iran has refused to abandon its uranium enrichment activities [3] Group 3 - Following the Security Council's vote, Iran's Foreign Ministry condemned the actions of the European countries as illegal and provocative, while also stating that diplomatic channels remain open [5] - Iran has a week to engage in diplomatic discussions with the UK, France, and Germany to prevent the reinstatement of sanctions [5] - Iranian officials have warned that if sanctions are reinstated, they may cease cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and consider withdrawing from the Non-Proliferation Treaty [6]
【环球财经】恢复制裁“箭在弦上” 伊核问题走向何方
Xin Hua She· 2025-09-20 06:10
Core Viewpoint - The UN Security Council failed to pass a resolution to continue lifting sanctions on Iran, increasing the risk of Iran facing renewed UN sanctions [1][2] Group 1: Mechanism of "Snapback Sanctions" - The "snapback sanctions" mechanism allows any signatory of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal to request the UN Security Council to restore sanctions if Iran is deemed to have "seriously violated" the agreement [1] - The UK, France, and Germany initiated this mechanism on August 28, citing Iran's violations of the nuclear agreement [1] Group 2: US Responsibility - The current impasse in the Iran nuclear issue is attributed to a series of unilateral actions by the US government, including its withdrawal from the nuclear deal in 2018 and the re-imposition of sanctions [3] - Since May 2019, Iran has gradually ceased compliance with parts of the nuclear agreement, although it has stated that these measures are "reversible" [3] - The US has threatened military action against Iran while demanding negotiations, but Iran has rejected the demand to completely abandon uranium enrichment [3] Group 3: Future of the Iran Nuclear Issue - Iran's Foreign Ministry condemned the actions of the European countries as illegal and provocative, while also stating that diplomatic channels remain open [5] - Iran has a week to engage in diplomatic discussions with the UK, France, and Germany to prevent the restoration of sanctions [5] - Iranian officials have warned that if sanctions are restored, they may cease cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and consider withdrawing from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons [5][6] - Analysts suggest that such a withdrawal would end international oversight of Iran's nuclear activities, potentially leading to increased tensions in the Middle East [6]
英法德试图对伊朗“快速恢复制裁” 中国代表:坚决反对
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-09-20 06:08
这是位于纽约的联合国总部外景(9月18日摄)。新华社记者李睿摄 英法德强推"快速恢复制裁" 决议草案由9月安理会轮值主席韩国提出,未达到决议通过所需的9票赞成。中国、俄罗斯、巴基斯坦、阿尔及利亚投赞成票,美国、英国、法国 等9国投反对票,韩国和圭亚那弃权。 决议草案如获通过,将根据2015年伊朗核问题全面协议以及核可这一协议的安理会第2231号决议相关规定,继续解除联合国对伊朗的制裁措施。 6月20日,在瑞士日内瓦,德国外长瓦德富尔(中右)、英国外交大臣拉米(中左)、法国外长巴罗(中)与媒体见面(手机照片)。伊朗与英法 德三国外交部长当地时间20日19时左右结束在瑞士日内瓦持续约3个小时的会晤。这是以色列与伊朗发生军事冲突以来,伊朗首次与西方国家高级 官员进行面对面磋商。新华社记者王其冰摄 新华社北京9月20日电在美、英、法等9国投反对票的情况下,联合国安理会19日未能通过一份旨在继续解除对伊朗制裁措施的决议草案。英、 法、德等国同时试图启动对伊朗"快速恢复制裁"机制。伊朗外交部当天对此发表声明谴责。中方代表对此表示明确反对,强调政治外交解决伊核 问题的必要性。 接下来,伊朗同英法德三国及相关国家仍有一周左右 ...
中方坚决反对有关国家强推安理会启动“快速恢复制裁”机制
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-09-20 03:12
中方坚决反对有关国家强推安理会启动"快速恢复制裁"机制 中新社联合国9月19日电 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪19日在安理会表决继续解除对伊朗制裁措施决议草案 后发言表示,中方坚决反对有关国家强推安理会启动"快速恢复制裁"机制。 当天,安理会以4票赞成、9票反对、2票弃权的表决结果未能通过旨在继续豁免伊朗遭受制裁的决议草 案。中国、俄罗斯、巴基斯坦、阿尔及利亚投了赞成票,美国、英国、法国等9国投了反对票,韩国和 圭亚那弃权。 由于伊核协议参与方英国、法国、德国8月28日已通知安理会启动"快速恢复制裁"机制,若安理会未能 在30天内就继续解除对伊朗制裁通过决议,联合国对伊朗的相关制裁将恢复。目前,伊朗同有关国家仅 剩约一周时间进行外交磋商。 傅聪发言指出,造成当前伊朗核问题困局的根源是,美国单方面退出全面协议,破坏全面协议的正常执 行,恢复并不断升级对伊单边制裁,采取"极限施压"措施,致使伊无法享有协议赋予的经济红利,被迫 减少履行协议义务。美国还置自身信誉于不顾,悍然对伊核设施发动军事打击,破坏由其自身发起的谈 判进程。 傅聪表示,在这种情况下,英国、法国、德国援引安理会第2231号决议,执意启动"快速恢复制裁"机 ...
伊朗呼吁英法德继续通过外交途径寻求伊核问题解决方案
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-09-18 00:31
英法德三国外长8月28日就伊朗核问题发表联合声明称,三国当天通知联合国安理会,启动"快速恢 复制裁"机制,如果安理会未能在30天内就延长对伊制裁豁免期限通过决议,相关制裁将恢复。 阿拉格齐提及伊朗最近与国际原子能机构就恢复核查展开合作,说现在轮到欧方把握机会,继续走 外交途径,"防止出现本可避免的危机"。他强调,伊朗已准备好为实现一个"公平、平衡"并能保障各方 利益的解决方案而努力。而实现这一目标,要求英法德三国采取"负责任且独立"的态度,避免受到其他 国家影响。 新华社德黑兰9月17日电(记者陈霄 沙达提)伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐17日晚与英国、法国、德国外 长以及欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡拉斯举行电话会谈,呼吁欧方继续通过外交途径,寻求"公平、 平衡"的方案以解决伊朗核问题。 根据伊朗外交部发表的声明,阿拉格齐重申伊朗致力于通过外交途径寻求解决方案,批评欧方触 发"快速恢复制裁"机制的做法"缺乏法律和逻辑依据"。 ...
英法德启动“快速恢复制裁”机制,伊朗谴责
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-08-29 22:40
Group 1 - The foreign ministers of the UK, France, and Germany announced the initiation of a "snapback sanctions" mechanism regarding Iran's nuclear issue, which will take effect if the UN Security Council does not extend the sanctions waiver within 30 days [1] - Iran's Foreign Minister Zarif condemned the actions of the three European countries, stating that it complicates diplomatic efforts to resolve the nuclear issue [1][3] - The three European countries proposed three conditions to delay the reactivation of the "snapback sanctions" mechanism, including direct talks between Iran and the US, full cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, and disclosure of the latest locations of enriched uranium [3] Group 2 - Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson criticized the actions of the three European countries as allowing the "greatest violator of rules" to dominate the situation, referencing the US's unilateral withdrawal from the nuclear agreement in 2018 [3] - Iranian parliamentary officials revealed that an emergency procedure has been initiated to draft a proposal for a complete withdrawal from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons [3]
伊朗呼吁欧洲“作出正确选择” 专家称未来一周“很关键”
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-08-27 07:01
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the ongoing diplomatic efforts between Iran and the UK, France, and Germany regarding the nuclear issue, highlighting Iran's commitment to seeking a mutually beneficial solution through dialogue [1][3][11] - Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister, Ali Bagheri Kani, stated that the three European countries and the UN Security Council should make the right choice by allowing time and space for diplomacy [1][3] - The article discusses the "snapback sanctions" mechanism outlined in UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which allows signatories to respond to Iran's violations, with a deadline approaching on October 18 [3][9] Group 2 - The negotiations held in Geneva did not yield a new consensus, reflecting a lack of foundational agreement between Iran and the European nations [5][6] - Iran continues to assert that the European countries should not follow the U.S. in imposing illegal sanctions and should adopt a more independent policy regarding the nuclear issue [5][6] - The urgency for the European nations is highlighted, as they must complete the snapback sanctions process by the end of September to avoid procedural obstacles, with August 31 being a critical deadline [9][10] Group 3 - The cooperation between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) remains unestablished, with Iran demanding fair treatment and assurance against the misuse of verification data [10] - There is a significant lack of mutual trust between Iran and the West, particularly due to perceived U.S. dishonesty during negotiations [10] - The expiration of the 2015 nuclear agreement on October 18 poses a risk, as there is currently no replacement agreement in place, which could lead to miscalculations among the parties involved [10][11]