Core Viewpoint - The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) offers broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $1.32 billion, making it a competitive option in this category [1]. Group 1: Large Cap Value Characteristics - Large cap companies typically have a market capitalization above $10 billion, providing more predictable cash flows and lower volatility compared to mid and small cap companies [2]. - Value stocks, characterized by lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, generally exhibit lower sales and earnings growth rates, but have historically outperformed growth stocks in most markets over the long term [3]. Group 2: Costs and Performance - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.35% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.35%, which is competitive within its peer group [4]. - RPV aims to match the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Value Index, having gained approximately 6.65% year-to-date and about 12.98% over the past year, with a trading range of $81.66 to $97.21 in the last 52 weeks [7]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF's largest sector allocation is to Financials, comprising about 18.8% of the portfolio, followed by Consumer Staples and Healthcare [5]. - CVS Health Corp (CVS) represents approximately 3.23% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 23.69% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - RPV has a beta of 0.95 and a standard deviation of 17.83% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile with effective diversification across 107 holdings [8]. - Alternatives to RPV include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV), which have significantly larger asset bases and lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04%, respectively [10]. Group 5: Market Trends - There is a growing trend among retail and institutional investors towards passively managed ETFs due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11].

Core Viewpoint - The SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) is a large-cap value ETF that aims to provide broad exposure to the U.S. equity market, specifically targeting large-cap companies with a market capitalization above $10 billion, and has amassed over $40.08 billion in assets, making it one of the largest ETFs in this segment [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Overview - DIA is passively managed and was launched on January 13, 1998, sponsored by State Street Investment Management [1]. - The ETF has annual operating expenses of 0.16%, which is considered low compared to other funds in the space, and it has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.49% [4]. Group 2: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising about 26.5% of the portfolio, followed by Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary [5]. - Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS) is the largest holding, accounting for approximately 9.86% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing about 54% of total assets under management [6]. Group 3: Performance Metrics - As of August 19, 2025, DIA has gained approximately 6.42% year-to-date and 12.12% over the past year, with a trading range between $376.48 and $450.94 in the past 52 weeks [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 0.91 and a standard deviation of 14.6% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. Group 4: Alternatives and Market Position - DIA holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 1 (Strong Buy), indicating strong expected performance based on various factors [9]. - Other comparable ETFs include the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) with $70.84 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.06%, and the Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) with $141.70 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.04% [10]. Group 5: Investment Appeal - Passively managed ETFs like DIA are favored by both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them an excellent choice for long-term investors [11].

Group 1 - iREIT+HOYA Capital focuses on income-producing asset classes that provide sustainable portfolio income, diversification, and inflation hedging [1] - The service offers a free two-week trial for potential investors to explore top ideas within exclusive income-focused portfolios [1] Group 2 - The article emphasizes that successful investing is about purchasing good stocks at favorable prices rather than popularity [2] - It highlights the importance of individual due diligence in making investment decisions [3]

Core Viewpoint - The WisdomTree U.S. LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) provides broad exposure to the Large Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $5.22 billion, making it a significant player in this category [1]. Group 1: ETF Overview - DLN is a passively managed ETF launched on June 16, 2006, sponsored by WisdomTree [1]. - The ETF targets large cap companies, defined as those with a market capitalization above $10 billion, which are typically stable with predictable cash flows [2]. Group 2: Value Stocks Characteristics - Value stocks, which DLN focuses on, are characterized by lower than average price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, but they also exhibit lower sales and earnings growth rates [3]. - Historically, value stocks have outperformed growth stocks in nearly all markets, although growth stocks tend to perform better in strong bull markets [3]. Group 3: Costs and Performance - The annual operating expenses for DLN are 0.28%, which is competitive within its peer group, and it has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.9% [4]. - As of August 18, 2025, DLN has gained approximately 10.06% year-to-date and 14.2% over the past year, with a trading range between $70.70 and $84.97 in the last 52 weeks [7]. Group 4: Risk and Diversification - DLN has a beta of 0.81 and a standard deviation of 13.5% over the trailing three-year period, indicating it is a medium risk investment [8]. - The ETF holds about 307 different stocks, effectively diversifying company-specific risk [8]. Group 5: Alternatives - DLN holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating strong expected performance based on various factors [9]. - Other ETFs in the same space include Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) with $71.11 billion in assets and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) with $141.73 billion, both of which have lower expense ratios of 0.06% and 0.04%, respectively [10]. Group 6: Market Trends - Passively managed ETFs like DLN are gaining popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to their low cost, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11].

Core Insights - The Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF (FNDX) is a passively managed ETF launched on August 13, 2013, with assets exceeding $19.39 billion, targeting the Large Cap Value segment of the U.S. equity market [1] - Large cap companies typically have market capitalizations above $10 billion, offering stability and lower risk compared to mid and small cap companies [2] - Value stocks are characterized by lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, but they also exhibit lower sales and earnings growth rates [3] Costs - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.25%, which is competitive within its peer group, and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.7% [4] Sector Exposure and Top Holdings - The ETF's largest sector allocation is to Financials at approximately 17.4%, followed by Information Technology and Healthcare [5] - Apple Inc. constitutes about 3.86% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings representing around 20.25% of total assets under management [6] Performance and Risk - FNDX aims to replicate the performance of the Russell RAFI US Large Co. Index, with a year-to-date return of approximately 7.87% and a one-year return of about 12.26% as of August 18, 2025 [7] - The ETF has a beta of 0.93 and a standard deviation of 15.15% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [8] Alternatives - The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) are comparable options, with SCHD having $71.11 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.06%, while VTV has $141.73 billion in assets and charges 0.04% [11] Bottom-Line - Passively managed ETFs are gaining popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to their low cost, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [12]

Core Viewpoint - The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK) is a significant investment vehicle in the Mid Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with over $8.91 billion in assets, providing investors with a diversified and growth-oriented option [1]. Group 1: ETF Overview - Launched on July 24, 2000, IJK is designed to provide broad exposure to the Mid Cap Growth segment of the US equity market [1]. - The ETF is sponsored by Blackrock and has become one of the larger ETFs in its category [1]. - The fund has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.17%, which is competitive within its peer group [4]. Group 2: Investment Characteristics - Mid cap companies, with market capitalizations between $2 billion and $10 billion, are generally seen as having higher growth prospects and lower volatility compared to large and small cap companies [2]. - Growth stocks, while having higher sales and earnings growth rates, also come with higher valuations and associated risks [3]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Industrials sector, comprising about 29.1% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Consumer Discretionary [5]. - The top holding, Interactive Brokers Group Inc, accounts for approximately 1.61% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings making up about 11.43% of total assets under management [6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - IJK aims to match the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, with a year-to-date return of approximately 2.76% and a one-year return of about 5.25% as of August 18, 2025 [7]. - The ETF has a beta of 1.06 and a standard deviation of 20.02% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [8]. Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - IJK holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), indicating strong expected performance based on various factors [9]. - Other comparable ETFs include the Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and the iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP), with VOT having $17.40 billion in assets and IWP with $19.98 billion [10].

Group 1 - The stock market rally from April-May has been primarily driven by growth stocks, with a notable focus on the MAGA 7 stocks, which experienced a loss of $1 trillion in value due to Trump's tariff plans [2] - Growth stocks have consistently outperformed market averages, with the Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) and Russell 1000 Growth (IWF) showing significant gains compared to the S&P 500 [3] - The IWF has increased by 15%, while QQQ has gained just above 14%, compared to an 11% gain in SPY and only 5.5% in IWD, indicating a substantial opportunity for investors [3] Group 2 - The NDX 100 Advance/Decline line has been making new highs, with the QQQ reaching a high of $583.32 on August 14, although a divergence was noted with the A/D line forming a lower high [5] - The relative performance of QQQ completed a bottom formation on April 24, and has continued to support price action, with a drop below July lows indicating a potential shift in market leadership [6] - The ratio of iShares Russell 1000 Growth (IWF) to iShares Russell 1000 Value (IWD) has shown a strong uptrend, indicating a favorable environment for growth stocks over the past five years [9] Group 3 - The weekly ratio charts for IWF/IWD are positive, with an upside breakout above resistance noted at the end of July, although a short-term pullback may occur [10] - There are currently no warning signs from the monthly or weekly A/D lines, and low cash levels reported in the BofA Global Fund Manager Survey suggest a cautious outlook for the near term [11]

Core Insights - The SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is a passively managed ETF launched on September 25, 2000, with assets exceeding $3.89 billion, targeting the Small Cap Value segment of the US equity market [1][9] - Small cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations below $2 billion, present high potential but also higher risks, with value stocks generally outperforming growth stocks in the long term [2] - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.15% and a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.26%, making it one of the least expensive options in its category [3] Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising approximately 23.9% of the portfolio, followed by Industrials and Consumer Discretionary [4] - Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP) represents about 1.43% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for roughly 9.93% of total assets under management [5] Performance Metrics - SLYV aims to replicate the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, which includes U.S. common equities with market capitalizations between $250 million and $1.2 billion [6] - As of August 15, 2025, the ETF has experienced a year-to-date loss of approximately 1.23% but has gained about 7.01% over the past year, with a trading range between $67.03 and $95.14 in the last 52 weeks [7] - The ETF has a beta of 1.07 and a standard deviation of 22.48% over the trailing three-year period, indicating a medium risk profile [7] Alternatives - Other ETFs in the small cap value space include the iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) with $11.32 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.24%, and the Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) with $30.76 billion in assets and a lower expense ratio of 0.07% [10] Conclusion - Passively managed ETFs like SLYV are favored by both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making them suitable for long-term investment strategies [11]

Core Viewpoint - The Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) is a leading investment vehicle for exposure to the Small Cap Growth segment of the US equity market, with significant assets and low operating costs [1][4]. Group 1: Fund Overview - VBK was launched on January 26, 2004, and is passively managed, designed to provide broad exposure to small-cap growth stocks [1]. - The fund has amassed over $19.88 billion in assets, making it the largest ETF in its category [1]. - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.07%, positioning it as one of the least expensive options available [4]. Group 2: Investment Potential - Small-cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations below $2 billion, present high potential for growth but also come with increased risk [2]. - Growth stocks typically exhibit higher sales and earnings growth rates compared to the broader market, although they carry higher valuations and volatility [3]. Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Industrials sector, comprising approximately 22.2% of the portfolio, followed by Information Technology and Healthcare [5]. - Individual holdings include Slcmt1142 at about 2% of total assets, with Liberty Media Corp-Liberty Formula One (FWONK) and Natera Inc (NTRA) also among the top holdings [6]. Group 4: Performance Metrics - VBK aims to match the performance of the CRSP U.S. Small Cap Growth Index, which tracks small-cap growth stocks [7]. - The ETF has gained approximately 3.74% year-to-date and 16.6% over the past year, with a trading range between $219.76 and $304.19 in the last 52 weeks [7]. - It has a beta of 1.13 and a standard deviation of 22.39% over the trailing three-year period, indicating medium risk [8]. Group 5: Alternatives and Market Position - VBK holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a viable option for investors seeking small-cap growth exposure [9]. - Other alternatives in the market include the iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) and the iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO), with assets of $6.30 billion and $12.28 billion respectively [10]. Group 6: Conclusion - Passively managed ETFs like VBK are favored by both institutional and retail investors due to their low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency [11].

Core Viewpoint - The Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) is a passively managed fund that aims to provide broad exposure to the Small Cap Value segment of the US equity market, with assets totaling over $583.48 million [1] Group 1: Investment Characteristics - Small cap companies, defined as those with market capitalizations below $2 billion, present higher potential returns but also increased risks [2] - Value stocks typically exhibit lower price-to-earnings and price-to-book ratios, along with lower sales and earnings growth rates, yet have historically outperformed growth stocks in most markets [2] Group 2: Costs and Performance - The annual operating expenses for XSVM are 0.36%, which is competitive within its peer group, and it has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2% [3] - As of August 14, 2025, XSVM has gained approximately 3.96% year-to-date and 7.17% over the past year, with a trading range between $44.22 and $60.64 in the last 52 weeks [6] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Financials sector, comprising about 50.4% of the portfolio, followed by Consumer Discretionary and Industrials [4] - Spartannash Co (SPTN) represents about 1.93% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 14.88% of total assets under management [5] Group 4: Risk and Alternatives - XSVM seeks to match the performance of the S&P 600 High Momentum Value Index, which includes securities with strong value characteristics from the Russell 2000 Index, and has a beta of 1.07 and a standard deviation of 22.6% over the trailing three years [6][7] - Alternatives to XSVM include the iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF (IWN) and the Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR), which have larger asset bases and lower expense ratios [9]