由于张某、赵某没有参与法院的诉讼，无权申请再审。2022年7月，二人无奈之下向赣榆区检察院 控告，主张诉争房屋系其所有，并提交二人与A公司签订的《商品房买卖合同》、购房款收据、房屋维 修基金收据等证据。承办检察官初查后认为，该案有新的证据足以证明案件涉嫌虚假诉讼，遂依法予以 受理。 为了查明事实，承办检察官认真查阅卷宗材料，仔细核实争议房产的购买及办证过程，发现王某在 一审期间提交的首付款收据仅有复印件，且其始终无法提交该收据的原件供核实，原审定案证据存疑。 同时，承办检察官通过询问当事人及知情案外人，了解到A公司曾与他人签订部分虚假的《商品房买卖 合同》，由公司统一偿还贷款，王某便是"挂名购房人"之一，虽签订合同但从未发生真实买卖关系。那 这其中是否涉及诈骗而需要承担刑事责任呢？ "我们仔细调查后，发现王某与A公司签订合同，其主观目的并不是以欺诈形式进行真实交易，进 而骗取当事人的购房款或者占有涉案房屋，所以说王某的行为不涉及诈骗。"承办检察官说，结合张 某、赵某提供的购房合同、装修入住至今的照片、水电费票据等证据材料，均能证实案涉房屋由张某、 赵某实际占有并使用。 "我们哪能知道住了十几年的房子，还能差点 ...

王伟等业主担心，若债权人申请强制执行，他们将面临失去房 屋的风险。 作者： 田国宝 封图：受访者供图 王伟是呼和浩特市新城区昕泰大观小区的业主，该小区有65户业主与王伟一样陷入一场长达十年 的困境，他们购买的房屋至今无法办理房产证，原因是这些房子，有的被网签给他人，有的被法院 查封。 昕泰大观的多位业主称，他们于2014年至2015年通过开发商售楼处购房，支付首付款、签订商品 房买卖合同、办理按揭贷款，多数业主已居住十多年，并一直正常还月供。 由于无法办理房产 证，许多业主无法落户，子女入学也受到影响。 小区附近的学校无法就读，业主只能选择更远的 公立学校或支付高昂费用就读私立学校。 昕泰大观的开发商呼和浩特市达昕泰房地产开发有限责任公司（下称"达昕泰地产"）负责人柴瑞林 解释，2013年至2015年，达昕泰地产的股东之一赵宝私自抵押小区房屋融资，用于个人使用，并 将部分房屋以签订商品房买卖合同或网签等形式抵押给债权人，导致部分业主无法办理房产证。赵 宝个人债务违约后，其债权人起诉达昕泰地产并向法院申请查封昕泰大观部分业主的房屋，给业主 办理房产证又增加了障碍。 经济观察报尝试联系赵宝及主要债权人核实情况，赵 ...

Core Points - The article discusses the plight of 65 homeowners in the Xintai Daguan community in Hohhot, who have been unable to obtain property certificates for their homes for ten years due to issues related to property rights and legal disputes [1][4][13] - The root cause of the problem stems from the actions of Zhao Bao, a shareholder of the developer, who mortgaged the properties without proper authorization, leading to legal complications and the inability of homeowners to secure their property rights [6][9][10] Group 1: Homeowners' Situation - Homeowners purchased their properties between 2014 and 2015, but many have been unable to register their homes due to them being mortgaged or seized by creditors [1][4] - The inability to obtain property certificates has affected homeowners' ability to settle in the area and enroll their children in local schools, forcing them to seek alternatives [1][3] - A total of 65 homeowners are affected, with 52 properties registered under the name of Hohhot Guanghan Hotel Management Co., and several properties facing court-ordered seizures [4][5] Group 2: Developer's Actions - Zhao Bao, a key figure in the developer Hohhot Daxintai Real Estate Development Co., mortgaged properties without proper consent, leading to the current legal entanglements [1][6] - The developer has been involved in multiple legal disputes due to Zhao Bao's actions, which have resulted in criminal charges against him and his associates for fraud and embezzlement [10][12] - The developer claims to be taking legal action against Zhao Bao for his fraudulent activities, while also facing pressure from creditors seeking repayment [13] Group 3: Financial Implications - Zhao Bao's actions have led to a total borrowing of 2.3 billion yuan, with significant amounts being funneled into personal accounts rather than through the developer's official channels [6][9][11] - The financial mismanagement has resulted in creditors pursuing claims against the developer, complicating the situation for the homeowners who are caught in the middle [12][13] - The ongoing legal battles and the lack of clarity regarding the financial dealings have left homeowners in a precarious position, unable to resolve their property certificate issues [13]