一站式解纷机制
Search documents
破解群众办事“折返跑”难题
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-02 20:06
□ 本报记者 潘从武 □ 本报通讯员 王小丫 蒋文全 "原本以为要打官司才能解决,没想到在综治中心,半 天时间就和邻居握手言和了。"回想起在新疆维吾尔自治区奎屯市综治中心的调解经历,居民老张感慨 万分。 2025年5月,楼上邻居家中水管意外爆裂,导致老张新装修的房屋受损严重,双方因赔偿金额争 执不下,关系一度紧张。11月28日,两人一同来到市综治中心求助。 奎屯市人民法院派驻综治中心法 官欧阳羽斐依据民法典有关规定,一边向老张释明财产损失的合理计算方式,一边向邻居阐明其应承担 的侵权责任。 最终,在欧阳羽斐与调解员温月红的共同见证下,双方当事人达成调解协议并完成款项 支付。一场持续数月的邻里纠纷,在温情与法理的交融中悄然化解。 2025年5月,随着奎屯市综治中心 正式启用,奎屯法院同步派驻专业团队入驻,设立"法官调解工作室",打造"法院+N"多元协同解纷机 制,真正实现群众"只进一扇门,能解所有事"。工作室由资深法官带队,与社区调解员、网格员组 成"解纷服务队",将专业司法经验与基层调解智慧深度融合,为群众提供"一站式接待、一体化调处"的 便捷服务。截至目前,该工作室已成功化解邻里、物业等各类纠纷300余件, ...
最高法:海事专家与法官联动破解涉外船舶碰撞赔偿难题
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-07 08:58
Core Viewpoint - A significant foreign-related ship collision dispute was resolved through a combination of administrative enforcement and commercial mediation, showcasing an effective "one-stop" dispute resolution mechanism [1][3]. Group 1: Case Background - On November 2017, a foreign cargo ship carrying over 70,000 tons of coal from Indonesia to China collided with a vessel owned by a Chinese shipping company, resulting in damage to both ships [1]. - The foreign vessel incurred nearly 15 million RMB in towing costs to ensure cargo safety after the collision, while the Chinese shipping company sought over 17 million RMB in damages for repair, delays, and lost revenue [1]. Group 2: Dispute Resolution Process - Both parties had significant flaws in their pre-litigation loss assessments, necessitating a court-appointed evaluation to determine damages [2]. - To alleviate the burden on the parties, the Xiamen Maritime Court initiated a "one-stop" dispute resolution mechanism, involving experts familiar with maritime accident investigations and loss assessments [2]. - A mediation team was formed, consisting of experienced maritime lawyers and investigators, which helped narrow the gap in the parties' litigation expectations [2]. Group 3: Mediation Outcome - The mediation led to a settlement where the foreign vessel agreed to compensate the Chinese shipping company with $335,000, which was paid within 15 working days [2]. - The case exemplified the effectiveness of a tripartite mediation mechanism involving maritime experts, the maritime court, and commercial mediation, providing a model for resolving similar complex maritime disputes at lower costs [3].