Group 1 - The G20 has increasingly lost direction over the past decade, becoming too large and cumbersome, making it susceptible to political pressures and controversies [1][3] - The suggestion to include Russia and possibly China in the G7 reflects a need for a more global and forward-looking approach, moving beyond the aging industrial powers [2][3] - The idea of a "Nine Country Group" including BRICS nations plus Canada, Eurozone representatives, Japan, the UK, and the US is proposed to better represent current global dynamics [2][3] Group 2 - The G20's effectiveness has diminished, as it has become overly influenced by the G7, leading to a perception among emerging nations that the G20 is driven by G7 ideologies [4] - The G20 should not cease to exist but needs to become more effective, which could be achieved by reforming the G7 to reduce distrust and resentment [4]

俄罗斯总统普京：七国集团在全球经济中的份额逐年下降，而金砖国家的份额则在增长。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba felt a strong sense of unity and capability among the G7 nations in addressing global challenges during the summit [1]

日本首相石破茂：通过与七国集团领导人对话解决伊朗核问题的重要性已得到确认。 ...

日本首相石破茂：七国集团需要展现团结一致的态度，以应对全球性问题。 ...

加拿大总理卡尼告诉美国总统特朗普，七国集团"没有美国的领导就一事无成"。 ...

乌克兰总统泽连斯基：希望在六月份的七国集团峰会期间与美国总统特朗普会面。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The European Central Bank's Governing Council member, Nagel, stated that there is no evidence of a G7 confrontation against the U.S. by six other nations [1] Group 1 - Nagel emphasized that the G7 remains united and does not reflect a division among its members against the United States [1] - The comments suggest a stable geopolitical environment within the G7, which may influence market perceptions and investment strategies [1]

加拿大财长：七国集团团结一致，但在关税问题上存在紧张关系。 ...