张建忠表示，下一步，重罪检察厅将继续狠抓"三个管理"，以高质效办好最高检本级案件带动条线办案质效，加强对疑难复杂 和重大敏感案件的指导、督办，注重开展对审查起诉、审判监督等宏观重要业务态势、对危安暴恐、极端恶性等重点案件类 型，以及判无罪、不捕不诉等重要业务数据的分析研判，高效改进工作。 （来源：检察日报正义网 全媒体记者：崔晓丽） ——以"规范化"建设为基础，推动统一司法标准。针对办案存在的重点难点问题，牵头研究制定《陈年命案证据审查分析指 引》等规范性文件，同时选编6件陈年命案典型案例，为办案一线检察人员充实"办案工具箱"。围绕高质效办好毒品案件、依法 惩治危险作业犯罪等重点领域发布6批典型案例，为重罪检察条线办案提供参考。 ——以"专业化"建设为支撑，锻造重罪检察铁军。组织开展全国检察机关刑事案件出庭支持公诉评议活动，有效提升重罪检察 人员履职办案能力。加强重罪检察理论研究，设立重罪检察理论研究小组，引领各级重罪检察人员转变司法理念、强化证据意 识、推动理论成果转化为办案效果。依托重罪检察证据分析研究基地，组建由首批51名专家组成的专家库，为高质效办案提供 智力支持。 如何推动重罪检察办案质效整体提升？ ...

重在责：明晰权责清单与考核导向，压实管理责任 责任明确是管理有效的保障。要建立健全权责清晰、考核科学、问责严明的责任体系，确保人人肩上有 担子、个个身上有责任。一是压实层级责任。明确检察长、分管院领导、部门负责人、检察官、检察官 助理、书记员等各层级职责权限。检察长负总责，分管院领导对分管领域负责，部门负责人对本部门工 作负责，检察官对承办案件质量终身负责。形成一级抓一级、层层抓落实的责任链条。二是细化岗位职 责与权力清单。进一步完善检察官权力清单，确保检察官在授权范围内依法独立公正行使检察权。同 时，清晰界定各类司法辅助人员、司法行政人员的岗位职责，实现定岗定责、人岗相适。三是优化考核 评价机制。将"三个管理"的要求细化为可量化、可评价的考核要素。考核结果应真实反映工作实绩，并 与职级晋升、评优评先、员额进退等挂钩，打破"干好干坏一个样"局面，激发争先创优积极性。四是强 化严肃追责问责。对责任心不强、管理不到位、履职不担当导致发生冤错案、重大瑕疵案件、违纪违法 问题或造成恶劣社会影响的，要依规依纪依法严肃追究相关人员责任，包括领导责任和监督责任。坚持 失职必问、问责必严，维护责任制的严肃性。 基层检察院是维 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes the importance of high-quality legal supervision, focusing on effective case handling rather than merely numerical achievements, and aims to enhance the quality and efficiency of ordinary criminal prosecution through the implementation of "three managements" [1] Group 1: Management Strategies - The implementation of comprehensive, substantive, and standardized management throughout the entire case process, including clear case assignment rules, defined deadlines, and strict approval procedures, has led to the resolution of all cases exceeding one year in duration for two consecutive years while improving efficiency without compromising quality [2] - The use of appeals and prosecutorial suggestions has been enhanced to improve supervisory quality. For instance, in a case involving intentional injury and property damage, the Supreme Court accepted the appeal and corrected previous erroneous judgments, resulting in a sentence of seven years and six months for the defendant [2] - Regular hearings have been conducted to enhance judicial transparency and public trust. From 2024 to the third quarter of 2025, 21 hearings were held, accounting for 63.6% of the total ordinary hearing cases, promoting conflict resolution [2] - Continuous case quality checks have been organized, with four rounds of evaluations conducted on over 500 self-handled cases, achieving full coverage for 2024 and 2025, leading to an overall improvement in case quality and efficiency [2]

Core Insights - The article discusses the innovative management mechanisms implemented by the Kunming City Procuratorate in Yunnan Province to enhance the quality and efficiency of case handling, focusing on the "three management" approach [1][9]. Group 1: Management Mechanisms - The Kunming City Procuratorate has introduced mechanisms such as "graded, layered, and classified review" and "three lists and one table management" to improve case management and achieve high-quality outcomes [1][8]. - The "three lists and one table management" system allows for precise guidance in case handling, enhancing the overall management process [2][3]. Group 2: Case Management Innovations - The case management office has adopted a systematic approach to streamline the entire case handling process, ensuring that the initial case acceptance phase is efficient and effective [2][5]. - A comprehensive management table with 91 indicators has been created to assist in the quality assessment of cases, facilitating better decision-making and resource allocation [3][8]. Group 3: Quality Control and Evaluation - The Kunming City Procuratorate has implemented a quality evaluation system that has led to a 56.28% reduction in cases with inconsistent judgments [6][8]. - Regular quality assessments and feedback mechanisms are in place to ensure continuous improvement in case handling and to address any identified issues promptly [5][10]. Group 4: Collaborative Efforts - The establishment of a centralized management center for seized property has improved the handling and oversight of evidence, reducing risks associated with case management [4][8]. - Cross-departmental collaboration has been emphasized, with various agencies working together to address complex cases and ensure comprehensive oversight [20][21]. Group 5: Community Engagement and Support - The Kunming City Procuratorate has actively engaged in community support initiatives, providing judicial assistance to vulnerable individuals and ensuring their rights are protected [19][20]. - The focus on community-oriented justice has led to successful outcomes in various cases, enhancing public trust in the judicial system [24][25].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the innovative management practices implemented by the Kunming City Procuratorate in Yunnan Province to enhance the quality and efficiency of case handling, focusing on systematic management and data-driven approaches to improve judicial outcomes [7][11][17]. Group 1: Management Innovations - The Kunming City Procuratorate has introduced mechanisms such as "graded, layered, and categorized evaluations" and "three lists and one table management" to improve case management and ensure high-quality handling of cases [7][11]. - The "three management" approach aims to address pain points in case handling, making high-quality case management a habitual practice for prosecutors [14][17]. - The establishment of a centralized management center for seized property has streamlined the process and reduced risks associated with case handling [10]. Group 2: Quality Control Measures - The Kunming City Procuratorate has implemented a quality inspection system that has led to a 56.28% decrease in cases with inconsistent judgments [11][12]. - A comprehensive quality management framework has been developed, focusing on risk identification and dynamic guidance to enhance case quality throughout the judicial process [9][12]. - The introduction of specialized teams for specific case types, such as illegal mining, has improved evidence standards and cross-department collaboration [13]. Group 3: Case Handling Efficiency - The case management office has utilized a "risk list," "supervision list," and "quality efficiency list" to pre-screen cases, ensuring that potential issues are identified early in the process [9]. - The integration of data analysis in case handling has allowed for more precise identification of case connections, leading to more effective prosecution outcomes [9][12]. - The implementation of a self-service system for lawyers has improved access to case files, enhancing the efficiency of legal proceedings [20][21]. Group 4: Community Impact and Support - The Kunming City Procuratorate has actively engaged in judicial assistance programs, providing support to vulnerable individuals, such as victims of human trafficking [23]. - The article highlights a case where the procuratorate facilitated judicial assistance for a victim, demonstrating the institution's commitment to social justice [23][26]. - The focus on community-oriented justice has led to positive feedback from the public, reinforcing the procuratorate's role in ensuring fairness and accountability in the judicial system [24][28].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes that high-quality and efficient case handling is achieved through scientific management and a focus on three key management areas: case management, quality management, and business management [2][3]. Group 1: Macro-Level Business Management - The focus is on deepening the guiding principles of prosecution, optimizing resource allocation, and enhancing overall efficiency through a unified approach to the three management areas [2]. - Establishing a regular business data analysis mechanism to monitor key case types and business trends, providing insights for decision-making [3]. - Strengthening collaborative mechanisms among business departments and other legal entities to enhance social governance [3]. Group 2: Meso-Level Case Management - Implementing a comprehensive monitoring mechanism to ensure compliance with legal procedures during case handling, with a focus on major and complex cases [4]. - Establishing a tiered supervision system for case management to clarify the responsibilities and powers of various prosecutorial roles [5]. - Developing a management mechanism for sensitive cases to mitigate political and public opinion risks [5]. Group 3: Micro-Level Quality Management - Enforcing strict quality checks for every case, with regular self-assessments and peer reviews to identify and rectify issues [6]. - Enhancing external supervision to improve self-management among prosecutors, creating a collaborative quality management system [6]. - Providing targeted training and resources to improve prosecutors' legal knowledge and case handling skills [7].

Group 1 - The core idea emphasizes the importance of developing a Chinese prosecutorial knowledge system guided by Xi Jinping's rule of law thought, focusing on the overall development, legal construction, and prosecutorial practice, while strengthening cooperation between prosecution and courts [2][3][4] - The theoretical framework of the Chinese prosecutorial knowledge system includes five levels: socialist rule of law theory with Chinese characteristics, legal supervision theory, judicial theory, and prosecutorial theory [3] - The construction of the prosecutorial knowledge system should be based on Marxist epistemology and practical development, aiming to create an independent and unique prosecutorial knowledge system while reducing reliance on foreign academic achievements [4] Group 2 - The modification of the criminal procedure law in 2025 is a focal point for research, particularly in enhancing the legal supervision role of prosecutorial agencies [5][6] - Proposals for optimizing the prosecutorial functions in personal coercive measures include establishing a hearing procedure for arrests and improving the review mechanisms for detention necessity [6] - The construction of legal supervision systems for property coercive measures is crucial, addressing issues of abuse and ensuring that such measures require prior approval from prosecutorial agencies [7] Group 3 - The improvement of the plea bargaining system is suggested to transform the current system into a negotiation framework, emphasizing the need for communication between defendants and their lawyers [8][9] - The establishment of a mechanism for communication between prosecution and courts regarding sentencing guidelines is proposed to enhance the efficiency of the plea bargaining process [9] - The need for a clear definition of the prosecutorial role in the connection between inspection and prosecution is highlighted, ensuring cooperation among various judicial bodies [10] Group 4 - The optimization of criminal prosecution mechanisms is essential, focusing on the supervision of illegal cross-regional law enforcement and ensuring a coordinated approach across different prosecutorial departments [11] - The establishment of a mechanism for discretionary non-prosecution is proposed, allowing for a more flexible approach to minor offenses [11][12] - The activation of prosecutorial investigative powers is suggested to address significant criminal cases directly, streamlining the decision-making process [12] Group 5 - The enhancement of civil prosecution mechanisms includes supporting lawsuits for vulnerable groups and improving the supervision of civil execution [13][14] - The establishment of a comprehensive mechanism for administrative prosecution is emphasized, ensuring a seamless connection between administrative and criminal supervision [15] - The legislative framework for public interest litigation is proposed to solidify existing practices and ensure clarity in prosecutorial responsibilities [16] Group 6 - The development of mechanisms for juvenile prosecution is highlighted, focusing on a comprehensive approach that integrates various forms of prosecution to protect minors' rights [17] - The exploration of foreign-related prosecution mechanisms is necessary to enhance the understanding and application of international law within domestic contexts [18] - The integration of technology in prosecutorial management is emphasized, aiming to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of prosecutorial functions [19] Group 7 - The pursuit of high-quality and efficient case handling is identified as a fundamental value, emphasizing the balance between correctness and justice, as well as effectiveness and efficiency [20] - The "three managements" framework is proposed as a foundational aspect of prosecutorial work, focusing on business management, case management, and quality management to enhance overall prosecutorial performance [21]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting emphasized the importance of high-quality case handling by the prosecution to ensure fairness and justice, showcasing recent advancements and achievements in the prosecution's work [1] Group 1: Enhancements in Prosecution Work - The prosecution has made significant progress in legal supervision, focusing on serving the public and upholding the rule of law [1] - Prosecutors are dedicated to continuous learning and experience accumulation to enhance their case handling capabilities [2][3] Group 2: Case Handling Experiences - A notable case involved a civil public interest lawsuit regarding dolphin hunting, where meticulous attention to detail led to a successful damage assessment and recognition as a typical case for biodiversity protection [2] - The establishment of a comprehensive barrier-free emergency call system in Fujian Province was achieved through collaborative efforts in public interest litigation, demonstrating positive social impact [2] Group 3: Management Strategies - The implementation of the "three management" approach (prosecution business management, case management, quality management) has reduced administrative burdens while increasing case handling requirements, allowing prosecutors to focus more on case quality [3] Group 4: Legal and Ethical Considerations - Emphasis on understanding the essence of law and avoiding mechanical case handling is crucial, especially in juvenile cases, where cultural context and community involvement are considered [4][5] - The prosecution aims to provide comprehensive support for minors, including psychological counseling and job training, to ensure their well-being and future prospects [5]