扬好自己的帆，莫去撑他人的船。 ♬ 点上方播放按钮可收听洞见主播云湾 朗读音频 心理学家卢熠翎曾在一档节目中说： 洞见 （ DJ00123987 ） —— 不一样的观点，不一样的故事， 3000 万人订阅的微信大号。点击标题下 蓝字 " 洞见 " 关注，我们将为您提供有价值、有意思的延伸阅读。 作者： 易奥 来源： 帆书 樊登讲书 （ID: readingclub_btfx） "每个人都有自己命运的流转，有他自己的成败、生死。 如果别人没有提出要求，你就去帮助他，那么就会掉在别人因果的陷阱当中。" 有时候，我们看到别人深陷困境，总会于心不忍，忍不住给出建议或是施以援手，以为能够救 人于水火，但结果往往事与愿违。 随意介入他人的课题，未必能解救对方，反而会让自己背负上他人的因果。 人各有路，在这尘世间，每个人都有自己绕不开的南墙和难关。 充分尊重他人的命运，也不轻易介入任何人的课题，才是成年人该有的清醒。 介入别人的课题=背负别人的命运。 有位匿名网友，在论坛上分享了一桩让他后悔不已的旧事。 他大学毕业后留在了杭州，那个时候待遇和发展都很不错，想到老家的发小也在找工作，便想 着能帮一把是一把，主动邀请他一起过来 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the philosophy of "non-intervention" in the context of modern life pressures, suggesting it is more of a psychological defense mechanism than a profound wisdom [1] - The concept of "causality," originally from Buddhism, is simplified in contemporary discourse to justify the establishment of psychological boundaries, often masking personal limitations as universal principles [1][2] - The article argues that complete non-intervention is a fiction, as living in society inherently involves continuous mutual influence [2] Group 2 - Ethical considerations in intervention focus on how to engage responsibly rather than whether to intervene at all, emphasizing the importance of social roles that inherently involve intervention [2][3] - The article highlights a paradox in advocating for non-intervention, as promoting this idea itself constitutes a form of intervention that can alter others' actions [3] Group 3 - The notion of "fate" is framed as a sociological structure rather than a predetermined script, suggesting that individual actions are influenced by and can influence social structures [5][6] - The article references Anthony Giddens' theory of "duality of structure," indicating that social structures both constrain and enable individual actions [5][6] Group 4 - The article distinguishes between two types of intervention: one that conflicts with existing structures and fails, and another that acts as a catalyst for self-directed change [7] - Successful interventions are characterized by enhancing the reflexivity of the individual or organization involved, rather than providing ready-made solutions [8] Group 5 - Three principles of intervention are proposed: effectiveness, reciprocity, and boundaries, which together create a sustainable framework for engagement [9][11] - The effectiveness principle emphasizes the moral responsibility to assess one's ability to contribute positively, while the reciprocity principle highlights the importance of mutual respect in relationships [9][10] - The boundaries principle stresses the necessity of clear personal boundaries to prevent emotional exhaustion and maintain the capacity to help others [11][12]