不担当不作为

Search documents
刘长健、符学模、李品智,不担当不作为,被处理!
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-08-03 22:48
Group 1 - The report highlights two typical cases of negligence and inaction by officials in Danzhou City, Hainan, which have led to negative impacts on public interests [1][2] - Liu Changjian and Fu Xuemou from the Education Bureau failed to supervise a comprehensive education service platform project, resulting in a delay of 329 days and improper payment of project funds [1][2] - Li Panzhi, former head of the Newzhou Natural Resources and Planning Office, neglected his legal responsibilities, leading to prolonged unresolved land disputes and continuous public complaints [2] Group 2 - The report emphasizes the need for party organizations to learn from these cases and recognize the serious harm caused by negligence and inaction to party-people relations and political ecology [3] - It calls for enhanced supervision and accountability from disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies, with a zero-tolerance approach to misconduct [3] - The report advocates for proactive and responsible behavior from party members, urging them to embed preventive measures against project failures from the outset [3]
干事岂能“假把式”(金台潮声·作风建设系列谈⑨)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-05-27 22:40
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for accountability and proactive behavior among officials, highlighting the detrimental effects of inaction and superficial efforts in governance [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Issues Identified - Various forms of inaction are observed, including superficial engagement and a lack of genuine problem-solving efforts among some officials [1] - The phenomenon of "fake efforts" is linked to a decline in commitment to public service and is seen as a manifestation of bureaucratic and formalistic tendencies [1][2] Group 2: Consequences of Inaction - The "frog boiling" effect of complacency can erode the spirit of progress and diminish work capabilities [2] - A lack of a scientific evaluation system can lead to a "broken window" effect, where the inaction of a few undermines the efforts of diligent workers, creating a negative ecosystem [2] - Inaction and slow responses from officials can damage the credibility of the party and government, creating barriers between the government and the public [2] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Establishing a comprehensive evaluation mechanism is crucial, focusing on both immediate and long-term performance, linking results to promotions and rewards [3] - Strengthening ideological foundations is necessary to inspire genuine commitment and action among officials, integrating the spirit of collective responsibility into their mindset [3][4] - A scientific evaluation system should accurately distinguish between genuine efforts and superficial actions, fostering a culture of accountability and proactive engagement [4]