据新华社北京10月10日电（记者冯歆然、邵艺博）在10日的外交部例行记者会上，有记者问：近期有西 方媒体报道中国向柬埔寨提供大量武器援助，质疑中方在柬泰边境冲突问题上偏帮其中一方，曲解中方 同有关国家的防务合作，引发关注。请问中方对此有何评论？ (责编：岳弘彬、牛镛) "中方支持柬泰双方通过对话协商化解争端，支持马来西亚发挥东盟轮值主席国作用，以'东盟方式'推 动政治解决。"郭嘉昆说，中方愿根据柬泰双方意愿，继续以自己的方式劝和促谈，为巩固停火共识、 和平解决争端发挥建设性作用。 郭嘉昆表示，中国同包括柬、泰在内的东盟国家都在开展正常防务合作。个别西方媒体企图借此挑拨中 国同有关国家友好关系，注定不会得逞。 外交部发言人郭嘉昆表示，柬泰边境冲突发生以来，作为柬埔寨和泰国的友好邻邦，中方秉持公正公允 立场，积极劝和促谈，中柬泰外长达成"安宁共识"，中柬泰三方举行非正式会晤，中国外交部亚洲事务 特使多次前往柬、泰穿梭调停。在中国、马来西亚等有关方面积极推动下，柬泰双方达成停火共识，正 在通过双边机制保持沟通。有关各方对中方发挥的不可替代作用表示高度赞赏。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The meeting held in Shanghai between Thailand and Cambodia, facilitated by China, resulted in both parties reaffirming their commitment to a ceasefire amidst ongoing border conflicts [1][3]. Group 1: Meeting Details - The informal tripartite meeting took place on July 30, 2023, with representatives from Cambodia and Thailand expressing appreciation for China's role in de-escalating tensions [3]. - The conflict between Cambodia and Thailand began on July 24, 2023, leading to a ceasefire agreement reached on July 28, 2023, under the mediation of Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar [3]. - Following the ceasefire, reports indicated that Cambodia allegedly violated the agreement, prompting a response from Thailand [3]. Group 2: China's Role - China has actively engaged in diplomatic efforts to support a peaceful resolution, maintaining close communication with both parties and facilitating multiple rounds of dialogue [3]. - The Chinese Foreign Ministry emphasized its constructive role in supporting the peaceful resolution of the border dispute and highlighted the importance of the informal meeting in solidifying the ceasefire agreement [3]. Group 3: U.S. Involvement - The United States has also been involved in mediating the conflict, with President Trump reportedly influencing Thailand's decision to engage in talks with Cambodia [4]. - U.S. mediation has been characterized as "strong-arm," aiming to enhance its regional influence and portray itself as a peacemaker [5]. - Analysts noted a contrast in approaches, with the U.S. employing a "carrot and stick" strategy, while China preferred a more understated method aligned with ASEAN principles [5].