2月10日，今日说法一期节目《被冒用的身份》，引发关注—— 据了解，2022年秋天，董女士博士毕业后来到浙江，准备进入一所高校从事博士后研究。 然而，就在办理入职手续的关键节点，意外突然发生。高校为她缴纳社保时，系统提示缴费异常，无法 正常办理。 董女士查询后才发现，2021年至2023年，她博士在读期间，名下竟有六家浙江省内不同城市建筑公司的 社保缴费记录，而她从未在这些公司工作过。 这些异常记录让董女士失去应届毕业生资格，考公、人才补贴等切身利益受到直接影响。 随着调查的深入，孙某的上家寇某进入警方视线。经查，寇某长期在火车站等地捡拾他人遗失的身份 证，以每张200元的价格卖给孙某。 董女士的身份证就曾在2017年遗失过，这是她身份信息泄露的原因所在。 无奈之下，她选择起诉其中一家建筑公司。 检察机关介入调查后，揭开董女士信息被盗用的深层原因： 原来，建筑公司申请项目资质时，需具备10人至200人不等的持证技工人员配置。许多小微 企业不愿长期聘用技工，便通过中介购买公民个人信息，短暂为其缴纳社保应付审批，资质 到手后立即停止缴费。 而董女士的信息不仅被六家建筑公司盗用参保，还被违规办理了中级木工证。 随后 ...

Core Viewpoint - The National Cybersecurity Notification Center reported that 72 mobile applications are found to illegally collect and use personal information, with Guotai Junan Mobile Futures and Wumart Futures being highlighted for not clearly stating the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection [1][12]. Group 1: Violations in User Consent and Information Collection - 17 applications failed to provide clear prompts for users to read privacy policies upon first use, using default consent methods instead [2][13]. - 34 applications did not specify the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection in their privacy policies [3][14]. - 17 applications did not inform users about the recipients of their personal information, nor did they obtain separate consent for sharing [4][15]. Group 2: User Rights and Data Management - 5 applications began collecting personal information without user consent or continued to collect data despite user refusal [5][16]. - 9 applications did not provide effective means for users to correct, delete personal information, or cancel their accounts [6][17]. - 3 applications failed to process complaints and requests within promised timeframes [6][17]. Group 3: Withdrawal of Consent and Marketing Practices - 22 applications did not offer users a convenient way to withdraw consent for personal information collection [6][18]. - 2 applications used automated decision-making for marketing without providing options for users to refuse or opt-out [7][18]. - 4 applications processed sensitive personal information without obtaining separate consent from users [8][19]. Group 4: Security Measures and Compliance - 25 applications did not implement adequate security measures such as encryption or anonymization [9][19]. - 1 application continued to display ads after closing a page, disrupting user experience [10][20]. - 4 applications lacked a privacy policy altogether [11][21].

Core Viewpoint - The National Cybersecurity Incident Response Center has identified 72 mobile applications that illegally collect and use personal information, including several financial apps, highlighting significant compliance issues in the industry [1][2]. Group 1: Overview of Violations - A total of 72 mobile applications were flagged for illegal collection and use of personal information between December 26, 2025, and January 20, 2026 [1]. - Among the flagged apps, several financial applications were noted, including Zhongshan Securities, Dazhihui, Guotai Junan Futures, and Wukuang Futures [1]. Group 2: Specific Violations in Financial Apps - Dazhihui was found to have the most violations, totaling six, including failure to clearly inform users about privacy policies and collection practices [2]. - Specific violations included not providing clear consent mechanisms, not listing the purposes and methods of data collection, and failing to inform users about third-party data sharing [2][3]. - Other issues included inadequate options for users to correct or delete their personal information and lack of mechanisms for withdrawing consent for data collection [3].

以"短期退保"名义实施合同诈骗 根据通报，2020年7月起，宋某经营某保险经纪公司分公司，代理销售某保险公司年金险、重疾险 等保险产品并收取相应佣金。2020年10月至2022年5月，宋某以承诺返佣、保本付息为诱饵，直接发展 或招募仇某、季某等人，由其发展18名投保人，在投保人无真实意愿且无长期续保能力的情况下，由投 保人自筹资金，或由仇某、季某等人推荐融资垫付首期保费的方式，安排18名投保人先后投保20份10年 期年金险、8份20年期重疾险，并于投保后一个月至一年不等的时间内退保。 "代理退保"乱象不断，是金融领域"黑灰产"的主要表现之一。 近日，金融监管总局、公安部联合发布第二批金融领域"黑灰产"违法犯罪典型案例。这也是继2025 年9月公布首批案例后，两部门再次集中曝光金融领域"黑灰产"突出违法犯罪行为。 本次通报共涵盖5起案件，其中3起涉及银行业，2起涉及保险业。值得注意的是，保险业的两起案 例均与"代理退保"有关。 2023年9月，公安机关接到保险公司报案后对本案立案侦查。2025年3月至9月，法院对本案作出判 决。经法院审理，以合同诈骗罪判处宋某等七人有期徒刑十年六个月至一年不等，并处罚金，部分人 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the risks associated with not unlinking old phone numbers from accounts, which can lead to unauthorized access and potential financial loss when the number is reassigned to someone else [1][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A case was reported where an individual lost access to their WeChat account containing 100,000 yuan due to their old phone number being reassigned after not being unlinked [1][2]. - The police were able to recover the account and funds after identifying the new user [2]. Group 2: Regulations and Risks - According to national telecommunications regulations, phone numbers can be reassigned 90 days after cancellation, referred to as "secondary numbers" [2][4]. - The practice of reassigning numbers is a common method to optimize communication resources but poses privacy and security risks if the original owner has not unlinked their accounts [4]. Group 3: User Guidance - Users can check if a new number is a "secondary number" through a service provided by major telecom operators and internet platforms, which allows for easy unbinding of previous account associations [6][10]. - It is recommended to prioritize unlinking important accounts, such as payment and social media, before canceling the old number [12]. Group 4: Security Measures - After unlinking and canceling a number, it is advised to physically destroy the SIM card to prevent unauthorized use [13]. - Old electronic devices should also be properly cleaned to avoid leaking personal information, including financial and work-related data [13]. Group 5: Final Recommendations - The article emphasizes a three-step process for changing phone numbers: query, unlink, and destroy, to safeguard personal information [15].

转自：贵州日报 社交平台上关于抢票兼职的帖子。 贵州日报天眼新闻记者 操作简单、日结高薪、超低门槛……近期，在各类社交平台和兼职群里，类似高薪"兼职"信息频繁出现。 看似"轻松躺赚"的机会背后，具体需要哪些操作？隐藏着什么秘密？又是否存在个人信息与法律的双重风 险？记者就此展开调查。 证卡信息全上交 "工作内容：演唱会场抢门票，做过的不行""晚班20:00-04:00，日结300元，超过时间按20元/小时计算""不需 要自己手机操作，有工作人员操作，自己在旁边玩手机到下班，睡觉都可以"……根据一则兼职信息，记者在 求职中介指引下，前往应聘。 按约定时间走进一家挂牌为"某网络科技"的公司，记者看到已有约20名求职者在现场等候。 "昨天人排到走廊，改约今天。"一位求职者说。 随后，有工作人员来到等候区，介绍招聘内容。 随后，该工作人员收走愿意参加兼职的求职者身份证，然后进入办公室。 等待期间，该工作人员偶尔从紧闭的办公室门中探出头，按身份证信息通知求职者进入办公室提供验证码或 配合人脸识别。 记者观察到，在此过程中，有部分求职者因"注册不了"，或"曾被封禁过""参加过类似兼职"被通知离开。 含糊操作引担忧 结束调 ...

Group 1 - The National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center detected 71 mobile applications that illegally collect and use personal information, including the game "Egg Party" [1] - "Egg Party" (version 1.0.238) was found to have issues such as not clearly listing the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection in its privacy policy, and lacking appropriate security measures like encryption and de-identification [1] - The operator of "Egg Party" is Hangzhou NetEase Leihuo Technology Co., Ltd., which was established in 2009 and is primarily engaged in software and information technology services [2] Group 2 - NetEase Games stated that the reported issues pertain to the application version on the app distribution platform and are not the responsibility of the game itself, indicating they are awaiting further communication from third parties [2]

Core Viewpoint - The National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center has released a list of 71 mobile applications that illegally collect and use personal information, urging users to exercise caution when downloading and using these apps [1]. Group 1: Application Violations - The applications listed have various violations, including failure to provide a convenient way to withdraw consent for personal information collection [1]. - Many apps did not implement necessary security measures such as encryption and de-identification [1]. - Privacy policies of several apps were difficult to access or did not clearly outline the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection [1]. Group 2: User Consent and Rights - Some applications failed to provide effective options for correcting, deleting personal information, or canceling user accounts [1]. - There were instances where apps collected information from minors without obtaining separate consent from guardians [1]. - Users were not adequately informed about the processing of their personal information, including the identity of the data processors and the retention period of their data [1]. Group 3: Specific Applications - Notable applications mentioned include "Keep奖网," "无极带领养中心," and "厨建加油," each with specific violations related to user consent and privacy policy accessibility [1]. - The list includes various applications across different platforms, such as WeChat Mini Programs and Vivo App Store, indicating a widespread issue in the mobile application ecosystem [1].

Core Viewpoint - The illegal trade of WeChat store accounts containing personal information poses a systemic risk to personal data security, highlighting the need for enhanced protective measures in the digital economy [4][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A recent case in Yantai, Shandong, involved the illegal sale of WeChat store accounts containing personal information, leading to the arrest of a suspect for violating personal information protection laws [5]. - Over 300 accounts were traded, resulting in illegal profits exceeding 40,000 yuan [4]. Group 2: Legal Context - In the first three quarters of 2025, over 2,100 cases involving personal information violations were prosecuted, affecting around 4,400 individuals [6]. - According to Chinese law, providing personal information to others without consent and with illegal gains exceeding 5,000 yuan constitutes a crime [6]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Platforms should implement "account anomaly warning" models to monitor rapid changes in account information and ensure consistency between real-name authentication and account operators [7]. - Law enforcement should enhance "clean internet" initiatives using big data technology to combat the entire chain of illegal activities related to account acquisition and information misuse [7]. - Public awareness campaigns should be strengthened to educate individuals about personal information protection and the legal implications of trading personal data [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the importance of properly disposing of old mobile phones due to the potential security risks associated with residual personal data that can be recovered, leading to privacy breaches and legal consequences [3]. Group 1: Security Risks - Many users only perform basic data deletion or factory resets when replacing their phones, unaware that residual data can still be recovered, posing significant security risks [3]. - Potential consequences of improper disposal include theft of account information, loss of private data, and leakage of work-related information, which can result in severe financial losses and legal liabilities for individuals [3]. Group 2: Recommended Practices - Users are advised to enhance their data privacy awareness by thoroughly cleaning their devices before disposal, such as removing SIM and storage cards for personal safekeeping or destruction [3]. - It is recommended to utilize official trade-in services from mobile brands or authorized recycling platforms to ensure secure disposal, rather than discarding old phones carelessly or selling them to unverified vendors [3].