Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the Middle East is essential for curbing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, maintaining the authority and effectiveness of the international non-proliferation regime, reducing the risks of arms races and armed conflicts, and enhancing mutual trust among regional countries, thereby providing important mechanisms for long-term peace in the region [1] Group 1: Key Proposals - The Chinese representative emphasized three main proposals: striving for common security, maintaining the international non-proliferation system, and establishing the correct direction [1] - It was highlighted that Israel, as the only non-signatory of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons in the Middle East, should join the treaty as a non-nuclear-weapon state and place all nuclear facilities under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency [1] Group 2: Criticism of Major Powers - The representative criticized certain major powers for their double standards in the non-proliferation field, urging them to stop obstructing relevant UN meetings and to cease enabling regional allies to remain outside the international nuclear non-proliferation system [1] - It was also called for an end to the unilateral measures that suppress the rights of non-nuclear-weapon states to peacefully utilize nuclear energy under the guise of non-proliferation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board discussed Israel's military actions against Iranian nuclear facilities, with strong condemnation from China and calls for diplomatic solutions to the Iran nuclear issue [1] Group 1: China's Position - China condemned Israel's military actions against Iran and opposed armed attacks on peaceful nuclear facilities [1] - China emphasized the importance of political and diplomatic means to resolve the Iran nuclear issue and rejected the use of force and unilateral sanctions [1] - China expressed serious concern over the negative impact of current developments on diplomatic negotiations and called for restraint from countries that could escalate the situation [1] Group 2: International Response - Numerous IAEA member states expressed serious concern regarding the situation, with many developing countries strongly condemning Israel's attack on Iranian nuclear facilities [1] - Member states referenced multiple resolutions passed by the IAEA General Conference, stating that attacks or threats against peaceful nuclear facilities violate the UN Charter, international law, and IAEA principles, posing serious threats to nuclear safety and regional peace [1] - The emphasis was placed on political and diplomatic avenues as the correct approach to resolving the Iran nuclear issue, urging the international community to continue efforts in this direction [1]