中国军控与裁军协会秘书长戴怀成表示，日本作为二战战败国和《不扩散核武器条约》无核武器 缔约国，必须恪守不接受、不制造、不拥有、不扩散核武器的国际义务。日本首相高市早苗暗示 修改"无核三原则"，日本高官甚至妄称日本应拥有核武器。这些危险试探与其摆脱国际秩序约 束、加速"再军事化"的野心一脉相承。此次联合发布专题研究报告，希望向国际社会展现全面翔 实情况，推动各方警惕和遏制日本右翼势力的核野心，共同捍卫国际和平与安全。 新华社北京1月8日电（记者 陆君钰）《日本右翼的核野心：对世界和平的严重威胁》研究报告8 日上午在京发布。报告由中国军控与裁军协会与中核战略规划研究总院联合发布，呼吁国际社会 高度警惕日本右翼势力日益膨胀的核野心和日本军国主义复辟的危险动向，共同维护战后国际秩 序和国际核不扩散体系。 报告全文约1.3万字，提出"十条建议"：敦促日本首相立即澄清相关错误言论；要求日本政府恪 守"无核三原则"；敦促日本政府切实履行国际核不扩散义务，解决钚材料供需严重失衡问题；呼 吁日本国内有识之士制止政府危险动向；呼吁《不扩散核武器条约》2026年审议大会认真审议相 关问题；呼吁国际原子能机构加强对日保障监督；呼吁相 ...

除了稀土问题，最近日本在国际上还有不少令人关注的行动。比如，关于核武器的问题。大家都知道，日本有长期发展核武的想法，但没想到高市政府会如 此大胆。在最近的公开讲话中，政府官员明确表示日本需要拥有核武器来保障自身安全。令人费解的是，他们给出的理由非常薄弱，竟然说中、俄、朝等国 都拥有核武器，而日本因为夹在其中，感到十分不安全。这个言论一出，国际社会并没有对其表示支持，反而纷纷对日本进行了批评，甚至在一些场合中利 用这个机会对日本进行攻击。 其实，答案依然没有改变——在高市收回错误言论并且诚恳道歉之前，中日关系不会有根本性的改变，也不存在哪种政治冷而经济热的情况。近期，中国不 仅停止了日本渔业和水产业的进口，还对旅游和文化产业下了重手。可以说，日本元素在中国的出现已越来越少。至于稀土出口为何呈现相反趋势，这主要 是因为相关调整的滞后性。稀土的贸易流程复杂且审批周期较长，实际上，11月日本的稀土进口中，许多批次的订单可能已经在9月或10月就已批准。那些 已签署的合同，甚至可能早已装船出港，我们自然不会因为一时的紧张气氛而突然停止。不过，未来如果日本想要再获取稀土，那就会变得非常困难。 实际上，自从中日关系恶化以来， ...

来源：环球 近日，日本政坛再次传出令人惊愕的杂音。高市内阁一名负责安保政策的高官竟向媒体宣称"日本应该 拥有核武器"，日本防卫大臣在谈及"无核三原则"时也声称"不排除任何选项"。联系到近来日本政要不 断放风挑战核政策禁区，显然这并非孤立现象，而是日本右翼势力精心策划的一场政治试探。必须清醒 地认识到，日本右翼势力的拥核野心已不再是阴暗角落里的窃窃私语，而是不再掩饰的"司马昭之心"。 尽管日本官员有关拥核言论在国内遭遇严厉批评，在国际上也引发了广泛的忧虑，但面对日本日益膨胀 的军事野心，国际社会的反应不能止步于外交谴责和舆论施压。历史的教训告诉我们，对于至今未能彻 底反省侵略历史的国家，任何形式的姑息都可能酿成大祸。当务之急，是全球爱好和平的力量必须行动 起来，将日本的拥核野心彻底锁死在萌芽之中。 日本右翼的"拥核论"由来已久，是其谋求摆脱"战后体制"、成为不择手段的"能战国家"的一环。随着日 本政治右倾化不断加剧，日本政府嘴上虽然坚持"不拥有、不制造、不运进核武器"的"无核三原则"，但 实际行动却是在谋求掏空这一原则的根基。他们正在通过"切香肠"的方式，一步步降低核话题的敏感 度，试图通过不断的舆论造势使日本 ...

格隆汇12月20日｜据日本共同社，美国国务院的新闻事务负责人19日就日本高市政府的首相官邸人士发 表日本有必要拥有核武器的言论表示，"日本是核不扩散和核军备控制方面的国际领导者，也是重要伙 伴。"该负责人在接受采访时作出了上述评论，可能意在制衡拥核论。此人还强调为保护包括日本在内 的同盟国家，"将维持世界上最为强大、值得信赖且现代化的核威慑力量"。 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 12月19日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。 郭嘉昆指出，一段时间以来，日方在军事安全问题上错误言行不断，大幅调整安保政策，自我松绑集体 自卫权，图谋以"强化延伸威慑合作"寻求"核共享"，图谋修改"无核三原则"等种种手段，以推动盟国核 武器重返日本。现在，日方一些势力又放风要拥有核武器，反映出日本右翼保守势力复活军国主义、摆 脱国际秩序约束、加速"再军事化"的野心膨胀。 "日方试图将自己装扮为推动建立无核武器世界的旗手，营造二战核受害者的叙事。"郭嘉昆表示，事实 上，日方未能彻底反省本国发动的侵略战争，成为挑战《不扩散核武器条约》、破坏国际核不扩散体系 的动荡源。国际社会必须擦亮眼睛，认清日本在核不扩散与核裁军问题上的虚伪立场。 "近期，日本多个政党、多名政要和不少民间团体机构呼吁，必须坚持'无核三原则'，避免战争惨祸重 演。"郭嘉昆说，今年是中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年。日方必须深刻反省历史罪 责，恪守国际法和自身宪法，停止为扩军强武寻找借口，停止在拥核问题上试探国际正义的底线红线。 来源：北京日报客户端 有外媒记者提问，日本首相官邸一名高级别官员表示日本需要核武 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes China's strong opposition to Japan's potential abandonment of its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and the implications of Japan's military security movements, which raise concerns about a shift towards militarism [1][2] - Japan's vague stance on its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and the possibility of nuclear sharing arrangements are highlighted as significant negative policy shifts that could threaten international order [1] - The need for strict oversight of Japan's nuclear capabilities is stressed, given its unique position as a non-nuclear weapon state with advanced plutonium processing capabilities [1] Group 2 - The Fukushima nuclear accident is characterized as both a natural disaster and a man-made catastrophe, with ongoing concerns regarding the handling of nuclear wastewater [2] - China's firm opposition to Japan's decision to discharge nuclear-contaminated water into the ocean is reiterated, alongside calls for international monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [2] - The challenges and risks associated with the decommissioning of the Fukushima facility and radioactive waste management are underscored, necessitating continued international scrutiny [2]

Core Points - The UN Secretary-General's spokesperson emphasized the unwavering stance on denuclearization and nuclear non-proliferation, reflecting the principles set forth by Secretary-General Guterres [2] - The "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" established by Japan in 1967, which state that Japan will not possess, manufacture, or introduce nuclear weapons, remain a fundamental policy of the Japanese government [3] - Recent attempts by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to amend these principles have faced widespread domestic opposition [3]

Core Points - China expresses strong opposition to Japan's potential abandonment of the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and its military security developments, which raise concerns about Japan's commitment to peace and international order [1] - The Chinese representative emphasizes Japan's excessive production and storage of plutonium, urging strict oversight to prevent nuclear proliferation [1] - China firmly opposes Japan's decision to discharge nuclear contaminated water from Fukushima, advocating for international monitoring to protect marine environments and human health [2] Group 1 - Japan's recent military security actions have drawn international scrutiny, with indications of a possible shift away from its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [1] - The Chinese representative highlights Japan's unique position as a non-nuclear weapon state with the capability to produce weapon-grade plutonium, necessitating stringent controls [1] - The ongoing challenges related to the decommissioning of the Fukushima plant and radioactive management require sustained international attention [2] Group 2 - China calls for Japan to handle the nuclear water discharge issue responsibly and transparently, emphasizing the need to avoid nuclear safety risks [2] - The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is urged to maintain a long-term review of Japan's nuclear policies and actions to prevent proliferation [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes China's strong opposition to Japan's potential abandonment of its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and the implications of Japan's military movements, which could signal a shift towards militarism and nuclear sharing arrangements [2] - Japan's historical context of producing and storing plutonium far exceeding its civilian nuclear energy needs raises concerns about its nuclear capabilities, necessitating strict international oversight [2] - The ongoing situation regarding the Fukushima nuclear accident and Japan's decision to discharge contaminated water into the ocean is met with strong resistance from China, advocating for international monitoring to prevent environmental and health risks [3] Group 2 - The article highlights the need for Japan to handle the Fukushima disaster with transparency and responsibility, addressing the technical challenges and safety risks associated with radioactive waste management [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes China's strong opposition to Japan's potential abandonment of its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and the implications of Japan's military movements, which raise concerns about a shift towards militarism [1][2] - Japan's government has been vague about its commitment to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," suggesting a possible openness to nuclear sharing arrangements and enhancing extended deterrence cooperation [1] - China urges Japan to adhere strictly to its non-proliferation obligations and to provide clear explanations to the international community regarding its nuclear policies [1] Group 2 - The article discusses the Fukushima nuclear accident, highlighting it as both a natural disaster and a man-made catastrophe, with ongoing concerns about the management of radioactive waste and the decommissioning of the plant [2] - China firmly opposes Japan's decision to discharge nuclear-contaminated water into the ocean, stressing the need for international monitoring to prevent long-term environmental and health risks [2] - The article calls for Japan to handle the aftermath of the Fukushima incident with transparency and responsibility, while the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is urged to maintain ongoing scrutiny of the situation [2]