Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that China's representative strongly condemns the U.S. military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, labeling it unprecedented and a serious violation of international law and the UN Charter [1][2] - The U.S. actions are seen as exacerbating tensions in the Middle East and infringing on Iran's sovereignty and security, raising serious concerns from China [1] - The Chinese representative emphasizes the need for political solutions to the Iranian nuclear issue and criticizes the U.S. for undermining diplomatic efforts [2] Group 2 - The call for dialogue and negotiation is highlighted as the fundamental approach to resolving the Iranian nuclear issue, with a focus on de-escalation and ensuring civilian safety [2] - The importance of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in maintaining international nuclear non-proliferation and promoting peaceful nuclear energy use is reiterated [2] - Many countries express serious concerns over the attack on peaceful nuclear facilities, reaffirming that political and diplomatic avenues are the only correct options for resolving the Iranian nuclear issue [2]

Group 1 - Iran claims that the recent U.S. attacks on its nuclear facilities have caused "irreparable damage" to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), rendering it ineffective [1] - Iranian representative Reza Najafi stated that the U.S. actions represent aggression and fundamentally undermine the international nuclear non-proliferation regime [1] - Following the U.S. attacks on June 21, Iran confirmed that its facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan were targeted, but no signs of nuclear contamination were found [1] Group 2 - Iranian parliament's National Security Committee suggests the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime route for global oil trade [2] - If the Strait of Hormuz is closed, global oil prices could rise significantly, with Goldman Sachs analysts predicting Brent crude could spike to $110 per barrel if oil transport flows decrease by half for a month [2] - A reduction of 1.75 million barrels per day from Iran could push Brent oil prices to a peak of $90 per barrel [2]

Core Viewpoint - The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board discussed Israel's military actions against Iranian nuclear facilities, with strong condemnation from China and calls for diplomatic solutions to the Iran nuclear issue [1] Group 1: China's Position - China condemned Israel's military actions against Iran and opposed armed attacks on peaceful nuclear facilities [1] - China emphasized the importance of political and diplomatic means to resolve the Iran nuclear issue and rejected the use of force and unilateral sanctions [1] - China expressed serious concern over the negative impact of current developments on diplomatic negotiations and called for restraint from countries that could escalate the situation [1] Group 2: International Response - Numerous IAEA member states expressed serious concern regarding the situation, with many developing countries strongly condemning Israel's attack on Iranian nuclear facilities [1] - Member states referenced multiple resolutions passed by the IAEA General Conference, stating that attacks or threats against peaceful nuclear facilities violate the UN Charter, international law, and IAEA principles, posing serious threats to nuclear safety and regional peace [1] - The emphasis was placed on political and diplomatic avenues as the correct approach to resolving the Iran nuclear issue, urging the international community to continue efforts in this direction [1]