Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the differing political stances of the Kuomintang (KMT) leadership in relation to various elections, highlighting the emphasis on the concept of "China" during the party chair election, while downplaying it in the context of the Taiwan election, focusing instead on opposing "Taiwan independence" [5][8]. Group 1: Party Chair Election - The KMT will hold its party chair election on October 18, with candidates emphasizing the concept of "China" [5][9]. - Candidate Zhang Yazhong expressed a sense of despair during the debate, indicating that the KMT has not truly governed Taiwan since Chiang Ching-kuo, and criticized previous leaders for their roles in promoting "Taiwan independence" [6][7]. - Zhang also lamented the loss of the party's spirit and the abandonment of Sun Yat-sen's ideology, criticizing the educational curriculum changes that have marginalized Chinese history [8]. Group 2: Candidate Dynamics - The current KMT membership demographics show that over 65% are aged 60 and above, which influences candidates to emphasize Chinese identity [9]. - If candidate Hao Longbin wins, there may be a shift of the KMT towards the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), as indicated by his more conciliatory language towards the DPP [10]. - Conversely, if candidate Zheng Liwen wins, collaboration with the People's Party may become smoother, potentially leading to joint candidates in future elections [11]. Group 3: Policy and Strategy - Hao Longbin's recent crisis management efforts included announcing five major policies regarding cross-strait relations, aiming to gain the support of older KMT members [12]. - Zhang Yazhong criticized Hao's policies, suggesting a significant gap in their understanding of cross-strait issues [12][13]. - The contrasting styles of Zhang and Zhao Shaokang highlight the differences between a scholar's approach and a politician's pragmatism [14].

Core Viewpoint - The upcoming Kuomintang (KMT) party chair election on October 18 is marked by Zhang Yazhong's desperate and passionate appeal, reflecting a sense of hopelessness regarding the party's future and its historical significance [2][3][4]. Group 1: Zhang Yazhong's Perspectives - Zhang argues that since Chiang Ching-kuo, the KMT has not truly governed Taiwan, citing Lee Teng-hui's betrayal and the rise of pro-independence sentiments as detrimental to the party [3][4]. - He emphasizes the loss of the party's core values and the abandonment of Sun Yat-sen's ideology, criticizing the educational curriculum changes that have erased Chinese history from Taiwanese education [3][4]. Group 2: Election Dynamics - The KMT's current membership demographics show a significant aging population, with over 65% being over 60 years old, which influences candidates to emphasize Chinese identity during the party chair election [4]. - The potential outcomes of the election could lead to different strategic directions for the KMT, with possible shifts towards cooperation with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) if candidate Hau Lung-bin wins, or smoother collaboration with the People First Party if candidate Zheng Li-wen wins [5][6]. Group 3: Candidate Comparisons - Zhang Yazhong positions himself as a scholar with a deep understanding of cross-strait relations, contrasting with Hau Lung-bin's political maneuvering, which is perceived as less substantive [7]. - The election is framed as a battle between a scholar's steadfastness and a politician's adaptability, highlighting the differing approaches of the candidates [7].

清政府在甲午战败后，于1895年4月签订《马关条约》，被迫将台湾割让日本。5月底，日军从台湾东北 部的盐寮沙滩登陆，台湾民众奋勇抵抗侵略者。这场在岛内持续近半年的战斗史称乙未战争。 戚嘉林介绍，当时由坚守台湾的湖南、安徽、广东籍官兵与台湾民众组成的义军并肩抗日，虽然武器装 备相差悬殊，但他们浴血抵抗，自北向南辗转血战日军，4个半月内牺牲超过14000人。 戚嘉林在介绍史料时说，日军攻破彰化城后，"纵横屠斩，路逢人则杀之，肆意甚欢"，午后"城内街道 上死尸累累，拥塞街道，鲜血滚滚"，仅东门一角所积死尸就约620余具。 新华社台北6月7日电（记者李建华、李悦）7日，由《祖国》杂志社主办、两岸和平发展论坛协办的纪 念抗日战争胜利与台湾光复80周年座谈会在台北举行。与会台湾学者表示，民进党当局刻意掩盖历史， 鼓吹"台独"史观，对乙未战争如此重大之历史事件装聋作哑。希望通过座谈会还原历史真相，唤醒台湾 社会的真实历史记忆。 《祖国》杂志社社长、台湾史研究会理事长戚嘉林表示，乙未战争及其后续风起云涌的武装抗日，是台 湾人民作为中华民族一分子掀起的爱国主义战争。近年来，民进党当局刻意掩盖历史，不但美化日本殖 民统治，还企图 ...