Core Viewpoint - The case of remote vehicle hijacking highlights significant concerns regarding data security and ownership rights in the context of second-hand car transactions, emphasizing the need for better protection of consumer rights and data privacy in the automotive industry [2][8][10]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A case in Shenzhen involved a former car owner remotely controlling a second-hand vehicle, leading to theft and safety risks for the new owner [2][3]. - The court found the former owner guilty of theft and endangering public safety, sentencing him to four years in prison and a fine of 6,000 yuan [3]. Group 2: Technical Analysis - Experts suggest that the former owner likely installed unauthorized remote control devices, which pose significant safety risks [3][5]. - Mercedes-Benz clarified that their vehicles do not support remote shutdown while in motion, indicating that the incident was due to unauthorized modifications [4]. Group 3: Data Security Concerns - The availability of remote control devices for vehicles on e-commerce platforms raises concerns about misuse by criminals, leading to potential safety hazards for legitimate users [5][6]. - Experts recommend that regulatory bodies define and manage the nature of these devices to protect vehicle owners' safety and property [6]. Group 4: Second-Hand Vehicle Transactions - The transfer of digital rights during second-hand car sales is often overlooked, allowing former owners to retain access to vehicle information and control [7][10]. - Consumers are advised to change account permissions and reset vehicle settings after purchasing a second-hand car to prevent privacy breaches [10][11]. Group 5: Regulatory Recommendations - There is a call for the establishment of clear standards for data deletion and account transfer during second-hand vehicle transactions to protect consumer privacy [11]. - Upcoming regulations, such as the GBT 44464-2024, aim to enhance data security by mandating timely deletion of sensitive information upon request [11].