Core Viewpoint - The case of remote vehicle hijacking highlights significant concerns regarding data security and ownership rights in the context of second-hand car transactions, emphasizing the need for better protection of consumer rights and data privacy in the automotive industry [2][8][10]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A case in Shenzhen involved a former car owner remotely controlling a second-hand vehicle, leading to theft and safety risks for the new owner [2][3]. - The court found the former owner guilty of theft and endangering public safety, sentencing him to four years in prison and a fine of 6,000 yuan [3]. Group 2: Technical Analysis - Experts suggest that the former owner likely installed unauthorized remote control devices, which pose significant safety risks [3][5]. - Mercedes-Benz clarified that their vehicles do not support remote shutdown while in motion, indicating that the incident was due to unauthorized modifications [4]. Group 3: Data Security Concerns - The availability of remote control devices for vehicles on e-commerce platforms raises concerns about misuse by criminals, leading to potential safety hazards for legitimate users [5][6]. - Experts recommend that regulatory bodies define and manage the nature of these devices to protect vehicle owners' safety and property [6]. Group 4: Second-Hand Vehicle Transactions - The transfer of digital rights during second-hand car sales is often overlooked, allowing former owners to retain access to vehicle information and control [7][10]. - Consumers are advised to change account permissions and reset vehicle settings after purchasing a second-hand car to prevent privacy breaches [10][11]. Group 5: Regulatory Recommendations - There is a call for the establishment of clear standards for data deletion and account transfer during second-hand vehicle transactions to protect consumer privacy [11]. - Upcoming regulations, such as the GBT 44464-2024, aim to enhance data security by mandating timely deletion of sensitive information upon request [11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing controversy surrounding Deep Blue Automotive's advertising practices on in-car screens, highlighting the company's response to allegations of intrusive advertising and privacy policy changes [1][2]. Group 1: Advertising Practices - Deep Blue Automotive faced backlash from car owners for pushing advertisements on the vehicle's display without consent, which some owners claimed affected their driving experience [2]. - The CEO of Deep Blue Automotive apologized for the incident, stating that the intention was to inform customers about a promotional offer, but acknowledged the mistake and committed to improving communication methods [2][3]. - The trend of using in-car displays for advertising has become common among automakers as competition intensifies, with several brands employing similar strategies to promote new models and offers [3]. Group 2: Regulatory and Privacy Concerns - The rise in complaints about in-car advertising has led to increased scrutiny from regulatory bodies, with new regulations requiring clear disclosure of advertising practices and user consent [4]. - Concerns about personal data privacy have escalated, with consumers worried about potential data collection by automakers for targeted advertising, including sensitive information such as location and in-car activities [4][5]. - A significant number of data breach incidents related to automotive companies have been reported, prompting the industry to implement measures for better privacy protection [5][6].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding Deep Blue Automotive's in-car advertising has sparked significant backlash from car owners, leading to clarifications and apologies from the company regarding the nature and intent of the advertisements [2][3]. Group 1: Company Response - Deep Blue Automotive's legal department has denied claims that in-car advertisements negatively impact driving safety and that users are forced to view ads for over five seconds [2]. - The company clarified that the advertisement appears only when the vehicle is in park (P) mode and can be closed by the user, ensuring it does not obstruct critical driving information [2][3]. - CEO Deng Chenghao acknowledged the mistake in communication and expressed regret, stating that the intention was to inform car owners about a special purchase voucher [3]. Group 2: Industry Context - The trend of using in-car screens for advertising has become common among automakers as competition intensifies and smart technology becomes more prevalent [3]. - Other manufacturers, such as Dongfeng Nissan and GAC Toyota, have also implemented similar advertising strategies, aiming to encourage trade-ins and referrals through in-car promotions [3]. - Complaints regarding in-car advertisements have surged, with a reported 210% increase in complaints in 2024, making it a significant concern for car owners alongside battery safety issues [4]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The National Internet Information Office and other regulatory bodies have issued guidelines to manage internet pop-up advertising, emphasizing user experience and the need for clear cancellation options [5]. - According to the Advertising Law, failure to provide a clear close button for advertisements can result in fines ranging from 5,000 to 30,000 yuan [6]. - Concerns about personal data privacy have risen with the increasing penetration of smart connected vehicles, with over 40% of consumers expressing doubts about automakers' ability to protect sensitive information [6].