Group 1 - The core argument of the article revolves around the critique of elite education, highlighting that it produces intelligent individuals lacking in self-awareness and personal fulfillment [5][6][21] - The author, William Deresiewicz, emphasizes that the situation regarding elite education has worsened over the past decade, with acceptance rates at top universities like Stanford and Harvard dropping from approximately 7-8% to around 4% [6][7] - The impact of social media and the COVID-19 pandemic on students' mental health is discussed, indicating that these factors have exacerbated issues related to anxiety, loneliness, and self-worth among young people [7][8] Group 2 - Deresiewicz argues that students need unstructured time to explore their interests and passions, which is essential for developing a sense of self and understanding what is truly important to them [9][10] - The article discusses the importance of allowing young people to make choices and learn from their mistakes, suggesting that this process is crucial for personal growth and developing a deeper understanding of life [15][19] - The author critiques the current educational system for prioritizing utilitarian outcomes over meaningful experiences, which leads to a lack of fulfillment and a sense of disconnection among students [22][23] Group 3 - The discussion includes the role of humanities and liberal arts in education, arguing that these fields are vital for exploring human meaning and purpose, and should not be diminished in favor of more practical disciplines [24][26] - Deresiewicz highlights the increasing value of human skills in the age of AI, suggesting that emotional intelligence, creativity, and interpersonal skills are irreplaceable and essential for future success [25][26] - The article concludes with a call for a reevaluation of educational priorities, advocating for a balance between practical skills and the exploration of human experience and values [22][24]