（来源：劳动报） 20年前，他用网络游戏定义了中国互联网的娱乐时代；10年前，他隐退并重金投入脑科学，探索人类智能的本质；今天，当AI大模型席卷全球，他带着 《我选择，我承担，故我在》回归大众视野，试图定义AI时代的"人类主体性"。"我选择，我承担，故我在。"这不仅是对笛卡尔名言的改写，更是一位互联 网先行者在AI巨浪面前，立下的投名状。 在最新撰文中，陈天桥提出的一个核心观点是在AI作为"超级工具"的时代，人类的价值在于主动选择和担责。他认为，尽管AI在执行层面能力强大，但它没 有"肉身"、无法承担最终的结果，也无法进行"非理性的创造"。因此，人类恰恰是通过自身的"碳基缺陷"，构筑了不可替代的防线。 "AI的本质是计算，人类的本质是博弈。"陈天桥指出，"选择和承担正是人类最后的防线。"他认为，只有人类作出选择并为结果负责的前提下，AI的运算才 能从"数据处理"真正转化为"商业价值"，他将人类担责的行为称为"确权"。 转自：劳动报 近日，盛大集团、天桥脑科学研究院创始人陈天桥在其发表最新撰文中透露，他正亲手打造AI原生公司Tanka，将"开源一切"，并承担责任。 据介绍，Tanka由盛大集团支持，目标是一个开 ...

Group 1 - The core idea revolves around the exploration of language and its implications in the context of AI, highlighting the tension between human creativity and AI-generated content [2][3][4] - The narrative of "Poetry Cloud" and the "Infinite Monkey Theorem" illustrates the concept of infinite possibilities in creativity, yet emphasizes the limitations faced by humans in realizing these possibilities [2][3] - The emergence of AI as a language-capable entity raises questions about the ownership of language and the potential erosion of human subjectivity [3][4] Group 2 - The impact of AI on creative professions is significant, leading to a reevaluation of the value of knowledge, thought, and creativity, which are traditionally linked to human identity [4][5] - The philosophical implications of AI's capabilities challenge the essence of human existence and the ethical frameworks that govern society [4][5] - The discussion of freedom versus happiness in the context of AI suggests a potential trade-off where reliance on AI may lead to a loss of individual autonomy [15][16] Group 3 - The narrative emphasizes the importance of writing as a form of self-exploration and resistance against limitations, asserting that true writing is inherently human and cannot be replicated by AI [17][18] - The role of the reader in interpreting AI-generated texts highlights a shift in the nature of creativity, where the absence of a human author does not negate the reader's engagement [18] - The conclusion reinforces the belief in the enduring value of human expression and the necessity to resist the allure of AI-generated content, advocating for the importance of maintaining one's creative voice [17][19]