人类灭绝风险

Search documents
兰德公司报告:人工智能引发的人类灭绝风险三大场景分析
欧米伽未来研究所2025· 2025-05-13 09:20
Core Viewpoint - The report by RAND Corporation discusses the potential existential risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) to humanity, emphasizing that while the immediate threat of AI-induced extinction may not be pressing, it cannot be entirely dismissed [1][2]. Summary by Sections Definition of Extinction Threat - The report defines "extinction threat" as events that could lead to the total death of humanity, distinguishing it from "existential threats" which may only severely damage human civilization [2]. Methodology - The research methodology includes a review of existing academic literature and interviews with RAND's internal experts in risk analysis, nuclear weapons, biotechnology, and climate change, intentionally excluding AI experts to focus on AI's capabilities in specific scenarios [2]. Nuclear War Scenario - The report analyzes the potential for nuclear war to threaten human extinction, concluding that even in worst-case scenarios, nuclear winter is unlikely to cause total extinction due to insufficient smoke production [3]. - AI currently lacks the independent capability to instigate an extinction-level nuclear war, as it would need to control a significant number of nuclear weapons, have the intent to exterminate humanity, intervene in decision-making processes, and survive a global nuclear disaster [3][4]. Biological Pathogen Scenario - The second scenario examines AI's potential role in designing and releasing lethal biological pathogens, noting that while theoretically possible, significant practical challenges exist [5]. - AI would need to design pathogens with high lethality and transmissibility, mass-produce them, and overcome human public health responses to achieve extinction [5]. Malicious Geoengineering Scenario - The third scenario explores the possibility of AI causing extreme climate change through geoengineering, which also faces substantial challenges [6]. - AI would need to precisely control complex climate systems, manage large-scale resource deployment, and evade global monitoring to create extinction-level consequences [6]. Cross-Scenario Findings - The report identifies common findings across scenarios, emphasizing that achieving human extinction would require immense capability and coordination, overcoming human resilience [7]. - The formation of extinction threats often requires a long time scale, allowing society to observe and respond to emerging risks [7]. Core Capabilities Required for AI-Induced Extinction - The report identifies four core capabilities that AI would need to possess to pose an extinction threat: 1. Intent to exterminate humanity [9]. 2. Integration with critical cyber-physical systems [10]. 3. Ability to survive and operate without human maintenance [11]. 4. Capability to persuade or deceive humans to avoid detection [12]. Policy Recommendations and Future Research Directions - The report suggests several policy recommendations to better understand and manage potential extinction risks from AI: 1. Acknowledge and take AI extinction risks seriously in decision-making [13]. 2. Use exploratory, scenario-based analysis methods due to the high uncertainty of AI development [14]. 3. Monitor specific indicators of AI capabilities that could lead to extinction threats [15]. 4. Continuously assess AI's role in known global catastrophic risks [16]. 5. Establish monitoring mechanisms for identified risk indicators [17].
AI 教父最新警告:AI 导致人类灭绝风险高达 20%,留给人类的时间不多了!
AI科技大本营· 2025-04-18 05:53
责编 |梦依丹 采访伊始,他用幽默的语气回忆起领取 诺贝尔物理学奖时的趣事:"他们只是假装我搞的是物理。" 然而,轻松的谈笑之后,是他对未来的深沉忧虑:"我认为人类面临的 AI 风险,远比我们想象中要严重得多。"更令人瞩目的是,辛顿首次给出了一个令 人不寒而栗的预测:AI 导致人类灭绝的可能性高达 10% 至 20%。他直言,我们正处在决定未来的关键节点,亟需投入大量资源研究 AI 安全,否则后 果不堪设想。 出品丨AI 科技大本营(ID:rgznai100) 继去年荣获诺贝尔物理学奖引发全球关注后,"AI 教父"杰弗里·辛顿(Geoffrey Hinton), 这位深度学习领域的奠基人 近日在接受最新采访中坦 言:"几乎所有顶尖研究人员都认为 AI 将变得比人类更聪明。"他之前在诺贝尔奖的官方采访中表示:AI 最快 5 年超越人类智慧。 具体见 诺奖采访深度学习教父辛顿:最快五年内 AI 有 50% 概率超越人类,任何说"一切都会好起来"的人都是疯子 此外,他还罕见地公开批评了科技巨头埃隆·马斯克,认为其行为正在损害美国的科学根基,这场"教父"与首富的隔空交锋,也折射出 AI 发展道路上复 杂的科技、伦理与 ...