为保护小雨身心健康，公安机关代其向法院申请《人身安全保护令》。法院受理后，快速出具《人 身安全保护令》，裁定禁止孟某某、唐某某对小雨实施家庭暴力，并联动公安机关、属地居委会落实执 行监督，经公安机关调解，继父唐某某搬离住所。同时，法院联合公安机关、检察院共同签发《家庭教 育指导令》，责令孟某某接受为期六个月的专业化家庭教育指导。 昨天（1月4日），最高人民法院发布六个"家庭教育指导令"司法适用典型案例，其中，由苏州工业 园区人民法院办理的"某区公安分局代为申请人身安全保护令案——'双令+四步法'反家暴，凝聚未成年 人保护合力"从全国各级法院选送的373个案例中脱颖而出成功入选。 未成年人小雨（化名）幼年丧父，母亲孟某某与继父唐某某再婚后，三人一起生活。有一天，小雨 报警称被父母打了。公安机关随即开展调查，了解到小雨与母亲、继父因家庭琐事发生冲突。其间，孟 某某、唐某某存在用手按倒控制小雨等暴力行为，此前两人也多次以"教育"为名对小雨实施暴力控制。 经心理健康评估，小雨已经出现抑郁症状。 针对家庭暴力背后的家庭教育失范问题，园区法院与公安机关、检察院创新推出"人身安全保护令 +家庭教育指导令"双令并行模式。法院 ...

"我真没办法了……他们天天骂我、盯着我，我活得不像个人样啊。" 九十多岁的刘老太坐在接待室，双手不停颤抖，活了大半辈子，她从没想过要和亲生儿子对簿公 堂。在工作人员帮助下，她一笔一画签上名、按了手印。 曾经，刘老太与儿子郭林一家相邻而居，守望相助的日子是邻里间的佳话。直到两年前，传来拆迁 的消息。利益放大了贪婪，郭林夫妇旁敲侧击劝老人搬去城里生活，说"生活更方便"。刘老太笑着婉 拒："老骨头就守着老宅子。" 这房子是她和丈夫一砖一瓦盖的，藏着一辈子的回忆。可她没察觉到，儿子儿媳脸上闪过的不满， 已埋下亲情裂痕的种子。 很快，郭林夫妇不再绕圈子，直接要求将老宅产权登记在自己名下。刘老太愣了，家里还有女儿郭 晴，怎么能只给儿子？她当场拒绝。 "连在院子里晒太阳都觉得有人盯着。"刘老太哭着对法官说，"他们就是要逼我搬走、放弃房子。" 在极度恐惧和无助中，老人再次求助法院，申请强制执行人身安全保护令。 密云区法院执行局接到申请后高度重视，考虑到刘老太已93岁高龄，执行局局长周铁军带队，与执 行法官余晓磊等人到刘老太家中，耐心倾听她的诉求，安抚她的情绪。法官立即约谈了郭林夫妇，严肃 指出其行为已违反保护令裁定。但面对法 ...

Core Points - The Supreme Court of China released typical cases of domestic violence for 2025, highlighting eight cases selected from the past three years [1] - One case specifically recognized self-harm or threats of self-harm as a form of domestic violence, establishing that such actions can instill fear and serve as a means of control [1] Summary by Sections - **Case Details**: In a domestic dispute in Chongqing, a husband threatened self-harm with a knife, escalating the situation when his wife attempted to leave with their child [3][5] - **Legal Action**: The wife reported the incident to the police and applied for a personal safety protection order, providing evidence of the threat [5] - **Court Response**: The court issued the protection order online within 20 minutes, prohibiting any form of domestic violence and outlining the legal consequences for violations [7] - **Resolution**: Following ongoing education and mediation from the court, women's federation, and community, the husband agreed to divorce and resolve issues related to child custody and property division [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that domestic violence is not merely a private matter but a serious crime that requires urgent legal intervention and societal awareness. The case of a woman suffering from domestic violence during her pregnancy highlights the inadequacies in the legal system and the need for improved enforcement of anti-domestic violence laws [1]. Summary by Sections Case Overview - A domestic violence case in Chengdu has drawn significant public attention, where the victim endured 16 instances of abuse over two years, even while pregnant. The perpetrator was sentenced to 11 years in prison for intentional injury and abuse [1][2]. Legal System Response - Despite the victim's six reports to the police and attempts to secure a personal safety protection order, the legal system failed to provide adequate protection. The victim faced obstacles in the application process for the protection order, which should have been a critical lifeline [1][4][6]. Regional Disparities - The article discusses the discrepancies in how domestic violence cases are handled across different regions. For instance, a similar case in Chongqing saw immediate police action and support for the victim, highlighting a more effective local response compared to Chengdu [9][12]. Legislative Framework - The Anti-Domestic Violence Law, enacted in 2016, established a legal framework for victims to seek help. However, the law's implementation has been inconsistent, with many victims facing high barriers to obtaining protection orders [13][15]. Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest that further measures are needed to enhance the understanding and application of the law among local law enforcement and judicial officials. A unified national mechanism for responding to domestic violence cases is essential to ensure that victims receive timely and equal protection [15][16].