一起围绕宗氏家族离岸信托的纠纷，让娃哈哈集团创始人宗庆后身后的资产分配问题浮出水面。 8月1日傍晚，香港高等法院披露备受关注的宗家财产纠纷案判决书，相关细节跃然纸上。 《华夏时报》记者从律师处获得长达43页编号为[2025] HKCFI 3355的文书中显示，三名原告分别为宗 继昌、宗婕莉和宗继盛，被告为宗馥莉和Jian Hao Ventures Limited（建浩创投有限公司）。 针对原告提出的保全令（汇丰账户中持有的净资产1,799,062,412.25美元）申请，香港高等法院依据《高 等法院条例》第21M条表示，禁止"提取（withdrawal）"和"抵押（encumbrance）"能在保全资产与避免 干预内地法院案件管理间达到适当平衡。 （截图自[2025] HKCFI 3355） 值得注意的是，根据判决书显示，宗庆后与宗馥莉曾签订一份委托协议。根据协议内容，宗庆后委托宗 馥莉设立三个境外信托（"信托A""信托B""信托C"，合称为宗氏境外家族信托），上述信托为不动本信 托。 不过香港高等法院认为，双方在信托及受信责任问题上存在一个严重的待审问题。 信托约定：三份文件浮出水面 据了解，宗庆后生前通过 ...

Core Points - The Hong Kong High Court has approved the asset preservation application filed by the plaintiffs, prohibiting the defendants from withdrawing or mortgaging assets in their HSBC Hong Kong accounts [1][11] - The case revolves around the inheritance dispute following the death of Zong Qinghou, the founder of Wahaha Group, and the complex family asset relationships that have emerged [3][4] - The plaintiffs claim that Zong Qinghou had established a trust to protect their interests, with specific instructions for setting up three offshore trusts, each valued at $700 million [4][5][6] Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The court's decision is part of a broader legal battle involving the establishment and execution of trusts intended to secure the financial interests of Zong Qinghou's children [9][10] - The plaintiffs allege that the defendant, Zong Fuli, has failed to fulfill her obligations regarding the trust setup and has improperly withdrawn funds from the HSBC account [8][12] - The court's ruling is primarily procedural, aimed at preserving assets while the substantive issues are resolved in mainland China's courts [11][12] Group 2: Trust Structure and Disputes - Zong Qinghou's estate planning involved a two-layer trust structure, with Zong Fuli holding assets on behalf of her siblings and their children [10] - The initial trust setup was intended to be irrevocable and non-distributive, focusing solely on interest income rather than principal distribution [5][6] - Disputes have arisen over the interpretation and execution of the trust agreements, particularly regarding the legitimacy of the initial instructions and the financial commitments involved [9][10]