Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolving nature of bribery, particularly how "business opportunities" are increasingly used as a guise for illicit benefit transfers, highlighting the need for legal clarity on whether such opportunities can be classified as bribes [1][7]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - The case involves a county party secretary (A) and a contractor (C) who, aware of the secretary's connections, arranged for a project to be subcontracted to a specific individual (B) for profit, resulting in B earning 2.6 million yuan [2]. Divergent Opinions - Two main opinions exist regarding the classification of A's actions: one views the receipt of business opportunities as non-bribery, while the other sees it as a form of bribery due to the nature of the benefits involved [3][4]. Opinion Analysis - The second opinion is favored, arguing that the business opportunity in question lacks genuine market competition and instead serves as a vehicle for financial gain, thus constituting bribery [5][6]. Characteristics of Business Opportunities - Business opportunities should possess market competitiveness, potential for profit, and require cost investment. The case illustrates that the opportunity presented was tailored and excluded market competition, indicating it was a vehicle for financial benefit [6][8][9]. Determining the Bribery Relationship - The relationship between the parties involved is analyzed, concluding that the contractor (C) acted with intent to bribe by providing a business opportunity to A through B, which was then monetized [10][11]. Recognition of Bribery - The article emphasizes that the business opportunity transformed into a measurable financial benefit when B subcontracted the project, thus establishing a bribery relationship [12]. Assessment of Bribery Amount - The total amount of 2.6 million yuan received by A is deemed to be directly linked to A's official capacity, and thus should be recognized as the bribe amount [13].