据最高检7月3日消息，宁夏回族自治区政协原党组书记、主席齐同生涉嫌受贿一案，由国家 监察委员会调查终结，经最高人民检察院依法指定，由广西壮族自治区南宁市人民检察院审 查起诉。近日，南宁市人民检察院已向南宁市中级人民法院提起公诉。 检察机关在审查起诉阶段，依法告知了被告人齐同生享有的诉讼权利，并讯问了被告人，听 取了辩护人的意见。 检察机关起诉指控： 被告人齐同生利用 担任宁夏回族自治区发展和改革委员会党组书记、主任，自治区政府副主 席，自治区党委常委、政府副主席，自治区政协党组书记、主席，全国政协民族和宗教委员 会副主任 等职务 上的便利，以及职权或者地位形成的便利条件，为他人谋取利益，非法收受 他人财物，数额特别巨大，依法应当以受贿罪追究其刑事责任。 无视中央八项规定精神，违规接受宴请； 违规收受礼金； 贪婪腐化，恣意妄为，将公权力作为谋取私利的工具，搞权钱交易，利用职务便利为他人在 采矿权证办理、工程承揽等方面谋利，并非法收受巨额财物。 延伸阅读—— 最高法、最高检《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》规定：贪污或者受 贿数额在三百万元以上的，应当认定为刑法第三百八十三条第一款规定的"数额特别 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolving nature of bribery, particularly how "business opportunities" are increasingly used as a guise for illicit benefit transfers, highlighting the need for legal clarity on whether such opportunities can be classified as bribes [1][7]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - The case involves a county party secretary (A) and a contractor (C) who, aware of the secretary's connections, arranged for a project to be subcontracted to a specific individual (B) for profit, resulting in B earning 2.6 million yuan [2]. Divergent Opinions - Two main opinions exist regarding the classification of A's actions: one views the receipt of business opportunities as non-bribery, while the other sees it as a form of bribery due to the nature of the benefits involved [3][4]. Opinion Analysis - The second opinion is favored, arguing that the business opportunity in question lacks genuine market competition and instead serves as a vehicle for financial gain, thus constituting bribery [5][6]. Characteristics of Business Opportunities - Business opportunities should possess market competitiveness, potential for profit, and require cost investment. The case illustrates that the opportunity presented was tailored and excluded market competition, indicating it was a vehicle for financial benefit [6][8][9]. Determining the Bribery Relationship - The relationship between the parties involved is analyzed, concluding that the contractor (C) acted with intent to bribe by providing a business opportunity to A through B, which was then monetized [10][11]. Recognition of Bribery - The article emphasizes that the business opportunity transformed into a measurable financial benefit when B subcontracted the project, thus establishing a bribery relationship [12]. Assessment of Bribery Amount - The total amount of 2.6 million yuan received by A is deemed to be directly linked to A's official capacity, and thus should be recognized as the bribe amount [13].