二十届中央纪委四次全会强调，以基层监督为支撑，持续优化基层纪检监察机构设置和力量配备，健全 空编人员动态补充机制，提升基层纪检监察监督质效。福建省安溪县纪委监委以体制机制创新为抓手， 着力破解基层办案力量分散、专业能力不强、治理深度不够等难题，为县域经济社会高质量发展提供坚 强纪律保障。 创新协同机制，攥指成拳聚合力。针对基层办案力量分散、任务不均衡等问题，探索建立集中办案模 式，按照"区域相近、规模适中、便于协调、优势互补"原则，将全县各乡镇纪委和派驻纪检监察组整合 为两个片区，下设小队、单元，实现线索、力量、任务、人员、工作统一调度。根据问题线索性质实行 分类管理，推行"派驻纪检监察组牵头+异地乡镇纪委配合"交叉查办，精准高效推进案件办理。以深化 派驻机构集中办公为契机，建立"碰头清思路、会商清问题、约谈清风险、收单清账目"的工作闭环，推 动职能部门履职尽责。 健全管控体系，精准施策提质效。持续拓宽案源渠道，探索形成"以案挖案一批、巡察反馈一批、监督 发现一批、部门移送一批、平台筛查一批"的模式，有效拓展问题线索来源。对问题线索实行分层管 理、分办处置、预警督办，对"骨头案""钉子案"等疑难复杂案件，落实 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the efforts of the Congtai District's disciplinary inspection and supervision committee in Hebei Province to address housing issues faced by the public, focusing on improving transparency and fairness in the allocation of affordable housing [1] Group 1: Actions Taken - The Congtai District's disciplinary committee has initiated a campaign to investigate and rectify corruption and misconduct related to housing, including improper occupation and lax auditing [1] - A total of 9,032 households were investigated, resulting in the cancellation of housing qualifications for 379 households [1] - The district has implemented a "grid-based" inspection mechanism to monitor the approval, allocation, and usage of affordable housing [1] Group 2: Institutional Improvements - The district has encouraged the establishment of four key systems to enhance the application review process, collaborative management, joint supervision, and dynamic updates regarding affordable housing [1] - The committee has conducted educational sessions on integrity and accountability for staff involved in housing services to promote ethical practices [1] - The overall goal is to ensure that affordable housing becomes a reliable and supportive resource for low- and middle-income families and migrant workers [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of case handling in improving governance and political ecology through a comprehensive management approach [1][2] - The New Zheng City Discipline Inspection and Supervision Commission integrates case investigation with political ecology restoration and institutional loophole identification, focusing on in-depth analysis and rectification of individual cases [1] - The commission aims to enhance the political ecology by addressing systemic risks and providing targeted recommendations for improvement to the involved units [1] Group 2 - The commission is committed to establishing long-term governance mechanisms by addressing regulatory blind spots and institutional shortcomings revealed by cases [2] - A total of 249 institutional mechanisms have been established since 2024 to tighten constraints on power and prevent corruption [2] - The commission emphasizes dynamic adjustments to power operation lists and internal control mechanisms to ensure effective governance [2] Group 3 - The commission focuses on education as a means to strengthen the ideological defense against corruption, utilizing both positive and negative examples [3] - A dual approach of "demonstration + warning" is employed in anti-corruption education, promoting local integrity culture while also highlighting disciplinary violations [3] - The integration of modern information technology into warning education enhances its effectiveness, fostering a culture of integrity among party members and officials [3]

Core Points - The central theme emphasizes the importance of addressing corruption and misconduct at the grassroots level to enhance public trust and ensure that development benefits reach the people [1][2][4] Group 1: Focus on Public Concerns - The focus is on identifying and addressing issues that the public strongly opposes, with a commitment to prevent and correct these problems [2][4] - The need for a people-centered approach in the work of disciplinary inspection and supervision is highlighted, ensuring that the concerns of the public are prioritized [2][5] Group 2: Mechanisms for Supervision and Accountability - Various mechanisms such as joint case handling and targeted supervision are proposed to enhance accountability and address "micro-corruption" effectively [4][6] - The establishment of a "problem list" from public feedback is suggested as a way to create a "performance list" for officials, ensuring that their actions are aligned with public needs [10][11] Group 3: Community Engagement and Transparency - Engaging with the community through multiple channels to gather feedback on pressing issues is emphasized, with a focus on transparency in handling complaints [5][9] - The importance of public participation in the supervision process is stressed, allowing citizens to have a say in the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures [9][10] Group 4: Long-term Mechanisms for Improvement - The establishment of long-term mechanisms to protect public interests and address "micro-corruption" is advocated, including the use of technology for better oversight [11][14] - A comprehensive approach that combines case handling with systemic reforms is recommended to address the root causes of corruption and improve governance [13][14]