光大证券股份有限公司（以下简称"光大证券" "保荐机构"）作为宁波博汇 化工科技股份有限公司（以下简称"博汇股份"或者"发行人" "公司"）向不特 定对象发行可转换公司债券（债券简称：博汇转债，债券代码：123156）的债券 受托管理人，持续密切关注对债券持有人权益有重大影响的事项。 发行人于 2025 年 8 月 8 日披露《关于公司重大仲裁事项的进展公告》 债券简称：博汇转债 债券代码：123156 宁波博汇化工科技股份有限公司 （住所：浙江省宁波石化经济技术开发区滨海路 2366 号） 光大证券股份有限公司关于 宁波博汇化工科技股份有限公司 向不特定对象发行可转换公司债券 临时受托管理事务报告 （关于重大仲裁事项进展） 债券受托管理人 (上海市静安区新闸路 1508 号) 二零二五年八月 重要声明 本报告依据《公司债券发行与交易管理办法》《宁波博汇化工科技股份有限 公司向不特定对象发行可转换公司债券募集说明书》《宁波博汇化工科技股份有 限公司 2021 年度向不特定对象发行可转换公司债券之受托管理协议》等相关文 件、第三方机构出具的专业意见以及宁波博汇化工科技股份有限公司出具的相关 说明文件等，由本期债 ...

Core Viewpoint - The arbitration ruling regarding the exclusive distribution agreement between Sincere Brand Management Limited (SBML) and Multicontinental Distribution (Asia) DMCC has significant implications for SBML's rights and operations in the distribution of Franck Muller watches and related accessories in specified regions [1][2]. Group 1: Arbitration Outcome - The exclusive distribution agreement was incorrectly terminated, but it is deemed to have been terminated as of October 3, 2022, granting SBML the right to seek damages [1]. - SBML's claims for customer indemnification guarantees were rejected [1]. - Multicontinental's claims regarding minimum purchase requirements were also dismissed [1]. Group 2: Obligations and Financial Implications - Multicontinental is required to repair and return withheld watches to SBML within 60 days from the arbitration notification date, excluding consignment inventory [1]. - SBML must return consignment products and organize inspections, and is obligated to pay Multicontinental and GFM for each consignment product sold, with a book value of approximately HKD 338 million as of March 31, 2025 [1]. - The arbitration tribunal ruled that both Multicontinental and GFM are eligible to be sued [1]. Group 3: Trademark and Distribution Rights - SBML must immediately cease any use of the FM trademark and stop claiming to be the (exclusive) distributor of the products, as a result of the arbitration ruling that the exclusive distribution agreement is considered terminated [1]. Group 4: Company Response - The company believes that the arbitration ruling aligns with its initial expectations and will further analyze the ruling to take appropriate actions to protect its rights and interests [2].

Core Viewpoint - The arbitration ruling requires the first respondent to pay a total of RMB 16,242,783.84 to the applicant, Shanghai Sinan Navigation Technology Co., Ltd., in relation to a contract dispute with Mankiaogou Mining [1][4][5] Summary by Sections Arbitration Details - The arbitration was initiated by Shanghai Sinan Navigation Technology Co., Ltd. against Mankiaogou Mining and Ren Dakai, with the claims including a technical service fee of RMB 14,500,000, a penalty of RMB 1,500,000, attorney fees of RMB 229,800, and guarantee fees of RMB 12,983.84 [1][4] - The total arbitration fee of RMB 204,442 is to be borne by both respondents, who are also required to reimburse the applicant for this amount [2][4] Ruling Outcomes - The ruling includes the following payments to be made by the first respondent: - Technical service fee: RMB 14,500,000 - Penalty: RMB 1,500,000 - Attorney fees: RMB 229,800 - Guarantee fees: RMB 12,983.84 - The second respondent is jointly liable for the payments outlined above [4][5] Impact on the Company - The arbitration ruling is final and does not affect the company's daily operations. However, the uncertainty surrounding the execution of the ruling may impact the company's profits in the current and future periods [3][5]