登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：000683 证券简称：博源化工 公告编号：2025-089 内蒙古博源化工股份有限公司关于重大仲裁事项的进展公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 特别提示： （一）受理机构 1.仲裁受理日期：2024年2月6日 1.案件所处的仲裁阶段：终局裁决。 2.上市公司所处的当事人地位：内蒙古博源化工股份有限公司为仲裁的第一被申请人。 3.仲裁结果：被申请人向乌审旗蒙大矿业有限责任公司（以下简称蒙大矿业）支付探矿权价款差额为人 民币1,889,145,230元；被申请人向申请人支付律师费、保全费、保全保险费合计为人民币915,798.36 元，第一被申请人与第二被申请人就其向申请人支付的款项承担连带责任；第一被申请人承担85%的本 案仲裁反请求仲裁费人民币11,855,584.95元和本案仲裁反请求仲裁费人民币12,415,208元。申请人向第 一被申请人支付律师费人民币300,000元。 4.对上市公司的影响： （1）本次裁决不会对公司的日常生产经营产生重大影响。 （2）本次裁决对公司财务状 ...

Core Viewpoint - The report discusses the progress of a significant arbitration case involving Ningbo Bohui Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. and its potential impact on the company's financials, particularly concerning its convertible bonds [3][5]. Group 1: Arbitration Case Overview - The arbitration case was initiated by the company against Fucheng Limited due to a contract dispute, with the arbitration request filed on August 30, 2023 [3][4]. - The total amount involved in the arbitration is RMB 71,087,122.30, which represents 17.68% of the company's latest audited net assets attributable to shareholders [5]. Group 2: Arbitration Requests and Counterclaims - The company’s arbitration requests include claims for breach of contract, payment of liquidated damages amounting to USD 3,365,761.27, and other compensation claims totaling USD 4,275,626.02 related to guarantees [4][6]. - The respondent, Fucheng Limited, has countered with requests to dismiss the company's claims and has sought liquidated damages of USD 2,353,109.70, along with interest and legal costs [4]. Group 3: Arbitration Ruling - The Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre issued a final ruling, which includes the company being awarded certain amounts along with interest calculated at a rate of 4% per annum until the date of the ruling [5]. - The ruling is final and effective from the date of issuance, but the respondent has yet to comply, leading to uncertainty regarding the execution of the ruling [5]. Group 4: Financial Impact - The company is currently unable to assess the impact of the arbitration outcome on its current or future profits due to the respondent's non-compliance and the uncertainty surrounding the enforcement of the ruling [5].

Core Viewpoint - The arbitration ruling regarding the exclusive distribution agreement between Sincere Brand Management Limited (SBML) and Multicontinental Distribution (Asia) DMCC has significant implications for SBML's rights and operations in the distribution of Franck Muller watches and related accessories in specified regions [1][2]. Group 1: Arbitration Outcome - The exclusive distribution agreement was incorrectly terminated, but it is deemed to have been terminated as of October 3, 2022, granting SBML the right to seek damages [1]. - SBML's claims for customer indemnification guarantees were rejected [1]. - Multicontinental's claims regarding minimum purchase requirements were also dismissed [1]. Group 2: Obligations and Financial Implications - Multicontinental is required to repair and return withheld watches to SBML within 60 days from the arbitration notification date, excluding consignment inventory [1]. - SBML must return consignment products and organize inspections, and is obligated to pay Multicontinental and GFM for each consignment product sold, with a book value of approximately HKD 338 million as of March 31, 2025 [1]. - The arbitration tribunal ruled that both Multicontinental and GFM are eligible to be sued [1]. Group 3: Trademark and Distribution Rights - SBML must immediately cease any use of the FM trademark and stop claiming to be the (exclusive) distributor of the products, as a result of the arbitration ruling that the exclusive distribution agreement is considered terminated [1]. Group 4: Company Response - The company believes that the arbitration ruling aligns with its initial expectations and will further analyze the ruling to take appropriate actions to protect its rights and interests [2].

Core Viewpoint - The arbitration ruling requires the first respondent to pay a total of RMB 16,242,783.84 to the applicant, Shanghai Sinan Navigation Technology Co., Ltd., in relation to a contract dispute with Mankiaogou Mining [1][4][5] Summary by Sections Arbitration Details - The arbitration was initiated by Shanghai Sinan Navigation Technology Co., Ltd. against Mankiaogou Mining and Ren Dakai, with the claims including a technical service fee of RMB 14,500,000, a penalty of RMB 1,500,000, attorney fees of RMB 229,800, and guarantee fees of RMB 12,983.84 [1][4] - The total arbitration fee of RMB 204,442 is to be borne by both respondents, who are also required to reimburse the applicant for this amount [2][4] Ruling Outcomes - The ruling includes the following payments to be made by the first respondent: - Technical service fee: RMB 14,500,000 - Penalty: RMB 1,500,000 - Attorney fees: RMB 229,800 - Guarantee fees: RMB 12,983.84 - The second respondent is jointly liable for the payments outlined above [4][5] Impact on the Company - The arbitration ruling is final and does not affect the company's daily operations. However, the uncertainty surrounding the execution of the ruling may impact the company's profits in the current and future periods [3][5]